beelzebub

I had wondered what goes as we resigned Frosty. Must be a mid we're seriously chasing

A F Im sure our Midfield doesnt help out our defence at times. In a fashion as I see that it only serves to highlight how poorly the defence works at times. The Corridor is not our Defence's friend

do you mean ...the deal fell over or he fell over afterwards ??

I dont know if that WILL be it...but it might be or something like it. Have always thought its be blokes and picks etc.

Jack must be very excited

Wow..you know I wasn't going to get excited, because, well, you know how these things go but by crikey that's it !! Where's the lid opener???

last year !! yuck yuck

hope this is a BETTER house...last one wasn't that good

I saw..only AFTER I posted..lol.

word has it...House doesnt stand a chance !!

I've gone back to my 'failsafe' stance with Melb. Anything spoken or written is bullshlt.

You lost your way Red. That's okay. Months of sun and other distractions . Then you'll be right to do it all over again

fair to say a whole different set of circumstnace and opportunity. Dons made finals..he might be attracted by that

funny how we ( any number of people) see things differently Im the reverse here. I think fundamentally the essential players are actually here already for a decent forward line. Hogan, Jeffy ( though needs a rocket at times ) Milkshake , Hannan , Pedo McDonald T. A few lads like Weed and Johnstone to come in at some point when more capable. Harmes might improve I see the HOW we play forward ans more the thing to be bettered. We dont do thi swell..it seems rather adhock. if there IS style and plans here it's escaping this viewer. I see two areas of concern though with defence. We have no capacity to stem king tides when opposition decide to run the gauntlet of the corridor. Zones work to areas and fail down the guts ( imho ) . Also the 'rearguard press is fallible if your opponent has the capacity to back themselves going "over the top" Here you need the abilty to quickly shut down players as well as deny passage and the ball. Zoning is akin to spectator football in this respect and if caught out wrong footed by the ball flying over your head its too little too late afterwards. Here , thats us, Dees, need better tools of defence. We need the ability to teach players to identify the nature of incursion and automatically adapt. If a fwd needs manning up it needs to be done pronto.Currently we are very good at watching the other team mark a ball!! Do we have the manpower on board to do this right at the moment..Not how player X or Y might be in 25 games time...but now. No ..by my calcs we are 2 short of the ideal. We need a Lever type...we also need a REAL FB. Now this might surprise some but I reckon with another 5-7 kg and a change in role good ol Oscar could do this. It would in some fashion be a simpler if arduous role. Leave it to the Hibberds and Levers to cut off supply , intercept and set up Hunt for the reversed assault . If not Oscar..then 'someone' imported. Happy to have differing thoughts here Old oh..addendum. Some will straight away scream Watts !! I actually see him as neither a fwd or a back..Id like to see him develop as some sort of winger/come outside mid. A link man who CAN go fwd..who is excellent at disposal , is a better mark when not so quite congested in traffic and is the most reliable of any demon with a ball in front of the sticks anywhere up to 55m out. But he doesnt need to be a FWD to do this..just my opinion

The defence isnt tight. On good days the mids keep the ball going the right way and all is well. On days when we play teams that like to play the lines our style and capability of defence has some hope of corralling or just knocking over the line. For all the fawning over a wonderful zone tactic it is in reality just old school defending. Where we get split open and made to look as inept as the structures would provide is where oppositions have the temerity, the unmitigated gall to play the corridor. To this observer zones CAN NOT work then as there is nothing per se to protect. It becomes about the man and we don't man up. This IS why when other teams twig they can kick to a presenting fwd..or tall timber because they won't/can't be owned by our defence. Its not designed to. This is why the Levers of this game becone crucial. Theyre spoilers. They can mark when able and are good thinkers/ decision makers. Hibberd.. gem. Hard to fault. Cant do everything ( but tries ) Jetta. A rock. Almost unbeatable but gets pantsed when he has to take on someone with 300mm on him. ( But tries valiantly ) Hunt. Hot and cold rebounding/attack . When ON...wow...when not...where is he. He's young and will get better abd wiser. Fun times ahead. TMac...not a back.. as others rightly suggest DN ver 2.018 onwards Oscar Oscar Oscar. Dont think...do. Thinking is NOT your forte. Has got better. Doing some things well. Will do better with more experienced players beside him. Frosty. Exciting, but incons. Raw with potential. Floats between hero and nqr. Is really either depth or trade currency. Milkshake...see Tommy. Go forward. Might he be outside mid potential. Salem. Just needs to be FIT and WELL reallt. Be wonderful for him and us Vince...please leave it to the backs...just go annoy someone Lewis....am happy for him to drift through the back etc organising others where needed and taking those clutch moment marks. I think the defence needs rethinking. Current plan nqr !!

Ernest . I think JL has another season in him. Far from the slowest out there

Jones is actually a very poor leader on field. He plays a resilient game but seldom actually leads.

This is what I thought, until last sat.

Tbh. Im curious how Lever fits in if folk are wanting to keep the Backend as it is. I don't see how that works. Something/someone gives. Surely

think I might indulge actually....where's the Capt Morgan ???

Ok heres the thing. this thread was created to be a refuge from mentioning HWSNBN...and comfort lounge away from all the bullshlt. Hnece it's name I propose we have a moratorium on mentioning thing anything about the MFC as there's no bigger can of bullshlt that it right atm !! Hows the banana crops going ??

I know its a Melb thing, brothers , but is it about sets or best fit/available ?

Adelaide aren't in the box seat here perhaps !

I have nothing to base this upon. I'm wondering who's more interested in whom ? Who instigated what ? ?

I don't think in the context of this discussion that many over-rate Frosty. In the main Id think most would accept that he's still a bit raw, still more potential than 'delivered' but that all in all he's shown promise combined with a touch of verve. He's not there by a long shot.. but he might get there. Then you have Lever, who has indeed "arrived" and all things equal can only get better still. If we are to land Lever what is the currency to do so ? Most folk here , myself included, think Frosty might be part of that. If so..such is life, if not...such is life