Jump to content

Sir Why You Little

Life Member
  • Posts

    46,461
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    74

Everything posted by Sir Why You Little

  1. i have no choice, and we all know the displeasure. But going back to 1970 is not possible. The music was certainly much better......
  2. so do i mate. But don't hang the club out to dry when it chases memberships. They are the lifeblood. DL want his cake and eat it to. Those days are long gone.
  3. Humans Consume O.D. It's what we do. The snowball gets bigger every year until we burn ourselves out. Join the party...sitting at home alone won't stop it.
  4. settle down DL. Time for your blue and purple meds. Be a good boy.
  5. I doubt the club would stream live, most "Live" transmissions are on delay for legal reasons. I know it is only a practise game, but if something goes wrong and it hits youtube.. I would expect to watch a replay in 24 hours.
  6. I walk past Pokies everyday, nobody forces me to pump them. Last time i fed one was 1989 at Jupiters on the Gold Coast. I don't gamble, not interested. I spend my money in different ways. I have no great issue with them, apart from the fact that they have killed the old Pub as we knew it. Security costs and councils have been just as damaging. Pokies are like Brothels. If you do not have them above board they will be illegal operations. A lot of Humans use them.
  7. Mathieson actually took Pokies off the Tigers and gave them to the Blues a few years ago!! Not a man to shake hands with me thinks!! Edit: i didn't realize he did the same to Footscray! Wow what a bloke!!
  8. Nathan Jones deserves a top rating. He carried that whole midfield as Moloney had cracked the [censored] and didn't care any more. But who cares it's 2012 figures. A year i have bulk erased from my head as far as footy goes. We know how good Jones was.
  9. A fit and Focused Allen Jakovich thanks. The guy was a dead set freak. Could still play today, just let him play in the 50 metre arc.
  10. This is why Vlad never ever wanted to admit to the fact that the Tanking word existed. And why the 6 other clubs got off scott free. It stinks but it is what it is.
  11. this could work. I do not like the situation where a player needs to come off because of fatigue and cannot because a cap has been reached. It is dangerous. The game will continue to get quicker incremently so i will never like a finite cap per quarter. But dropping from 4-2 may address both sides.
  12. Our Power Brokers are the ones that kick in the most at the Foundation Heroes dinners. Whether they are important to Jon Ralph is no concern of mine.
  13. Sure, but it does not seem to carry out onto the FD and players. At the MFC it seems to infect everything down the line when it flares.
  14. Dr. Turf and that idiot Stephen J. Peake in the commentary box would be the go!!
  15. yes i understand that, and you are right. BUT WHY is it that the MFC cannot keep those egos at bay over many decades whilst other clubs can. Egos are at all clubs. Old MFC Egos seem to be the most resentful. WHY?
  16. But how do you factor in a team that starts well but maybe because of injury loses its last 7 games. Should they intrude on a celler dwellers pick? This is why i think you need fixture weightings.
  17. you are right nut...BUT it has been difficult for the MFC for over 40 years. WHY? In 1987 Australian Football began the journey of becoming Professional. That year we made finals and did so for 5 years. We were on level terms with the heavy weights. At what point does this club breakdown? It happened again after 2000, we failed to make finals in 2001. Why did this club not learn and grow from the '96 merger fiasco? Who or what (or both) keep retarding this club? The cancer must be stopped regardless of who or what it might be. I do not like my ex's for many reasons. I walk away and cease communication. Simple. Members of previous boards and ex players must do the same. No exception. The Club is Bigger and older than any one man....
  18. Let Essendon sweat. There were internal problems whether the board knew it or not. There will be sacrifices....somebody cheated.
  19. Yes as long as the % are weighted as to ladder position/list experience it could work. A narrow loss to a GF Contender should be correctly awarded. Weather conditions must be factored..Roof, raining, heat factor, travel.....
  20. long as they hang in there like last week. I am more than happy with ugly wins this year if needed. Have to build character and trust into this list. It was getting there in 2010, but something broke the cycle. I expect a win on Saturday. The Aints are at the crossroads, but still have good talent.
  21. Its a good idea rpfc, but it still penalises a side who genuinely does not have and desperately needs forwards. But it certainly promotes competitiveness which is needed, bottom clubs are going to stay at the bottom more and more. $$$ spending on FD will dictate that.
  22. Feel the same mate. Our B Side had a red hot go last week and hung on in very hot conditions (29 degs in the shade)That is the attitude we must expect every week, if this club is going to get better.
  23. Not a word will be said until the investigation is over. This is above the AFL's head.
×
×
  • Create New...