daisycutter

well someone might invent a time machine and then we would know what to do

well they now have 3 less home (incl nominal home) games to go to, so it balances out

where did i say he would play against the swans? i didn't give any prediction i just explained misson's comment meant swans or hawkes (2-3)

and i thought the mrp was going to be different this year.........

you say prosecution i say prost.......

lawyering is a very old profession, nearly as old as that other ancient profession

so may = hodge - wtf

i seem to remember it was hannibal's fault we went for toumpas he argued endlessly we needed a silky classy outside mid to complement viney's infield talents, not two of a kind yep, definitely hannibal's fault

to who? mr froggo or mrs froggo?

oh please stuie - give it up 2-3 weeks means this coming week or the one after (wanchors was the week 1) fmd

i think it's great we get to watch the brown-baggers get thrashed more often and it serves the neanderthal ch7 right

i thought it was his 1nd game

while you are at it dee-luded what do you think about our rich top professional sporting bodies like the afl and its separate clubs, being treated not only as not for profit organisations and not paying taxes, but also being the recipients of large government grants

a noble sentiment earl, as i expect of you

now you are being disingenuous. you fully understood my point and you tried to sidestep it so, to play your little game, show me a team or a player that actually tanked and then i would agree that match fixing and tanking are the same

well if you could show that any player actually tanked then i would agree that match fixing and tanking are the same

yep, sure sounds about right

that's a pretty unfair and racist remark about the good folks in outer mongolia

don't worry about t&w in his previous incarnation he tried to convince us all to follow the direction carlton was taking LOL

interesting there too, bub, that comfortable satisfaction or beyond reasonable doubt didn't come into it was just a negotiated settlement and not technically on tanking per se

a lot of that is quite true but playing a very loose zone type defense with players often 20+ metres away from their opponent is a huge difference from being more accountable for your direct opponent and applying little contested possession pressure. it only played to freo's strengths At least a man-to-man approach would have put some pressure on their superior skills Yes we got smashed at centre bounces and here again our strategy in at least containing it was very poor tactically i thought roos got pantsed tactically. players didn't help either

mrp rules 1. there are no rules 2.........

he'd have an uphill battle trying to prove it wasn't intentional he even said he lost it and had a brain fade

73 grand final

maybe we could get biffo and bitters to escort you?