Everything posted by daisycutter
-
2018 Membership Thread
george, i wonder how many of those aints memberships have been microwaved
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
-
Demons on Masterchef (16/5/18)
has anyone ever seen a masterchef on masterchef?
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
-
2018 Membership Thread
41,92222
- The No T$ No B$ Thread
-
2018 Membership Thread
41,803
-
2018 Membership Thread
why would this present any problem?
-
2018 Membership Thread
unfortunately we don't have a real home game till round 12 which must be getting close to cutoff date most of our home games seem to be in the 2nd half of the fixture
-
Is Brayshaw more rounded than the Trac?
in think brayshaw sounds much more rounded than bayshaw brayshaw woody. bayshaw tinny
-
Is Brayshaw more rounded than the Trac?
can we revive this thread in about 10 years?
-
Andrew Gaff
has been for every fa, rfa or potential come-home prospect......lol
-
THE BOMBERS' DOPING SAGA - THE FAT LADY SINGS
why are people so unkind?
-
THE BOMBERS' DOPING SAGA - THE FAT LADY SINGS
i like how hird has taken thompson's demise to turn it to the supplements program and how badly he (hird) was treated by everyone and victimised. it all about his ego and his refusal to accept reality
-
THE BOMBERS' DOPING SAGA - THE FAT LADY SINGS
no, not the spelling, just thought it a strange choice of word.......too woody for that lot of w@nkers
-
THE BOMBERS' DOPING SAGA - THE FAT LADY SINGS
effervess?????????????
-
THE BOMBERS' DOPING SAGA - THE FAT LADY SINGS
i do have to laugh at "the club abandoned me" line. he got enormous support from the club, even if they didn't agree with every action he took. how entitled can one get
-
THE BOMBERS' DOPING SAGA - THE FAT LADY SINGS
there is more than one defendant, ldvc ? (but i know what you mean) and absence of dna evidence doesn't amount to 'clearing'
-
THE BOMBERS' DOPING SAGA - THE FAT LADY SINGS
i understand, but until there is more info, i will maintain a 'healthy' degree of suspicion ? without going overboard
-
THE BOMBERS' DOPING SAGA - THE FAT LADY SINGS
because 'contamination' of evidence is a police procedural problem and needs explanation of course in court, but not only in court no-one is saying dna (trace or otherwise) is a panacea, but it raises a red flag when the biggest amount of illicit drug is mysteriously 'contaminated' and cannot be tested for dna as all the other (smaller) samples were i am wary of 'coincidences' especially in controlled and carefully planned operations like this . anyway, enough said already, i will follow this aspect with interest
-
THE BOMBERS' DOPING SAGA - THE FAT LADY SINGS
well i could have guessed that much too, but then like you i would just be speculating or are you saying you have specific knowledge? nevertheless a public explanation is required from the police
-
THE BOMBERS' DOPING SAGA - THE FAT LADY SINGS
i'm just suspicious in cases like this of "contamination" and asking for clarification police are highly trained in forensic sampling procedures, especially in pre-organised raids nothing personal re thompson re the mdma. just a desire for proper procedure. after that "let the chips fall where they may"
-
THE BOMBERS' DOPING SAGA - THE FAT LADY SINGS
I don't understand this dna contamination of the 839gm of mdma i always understood they could detect (differentiate) multiple dna profiles in a sample and could therefore at least determine if there was any dna from thompson even where there was police dna on it due to mishandling unless.... it was suspected that the handling of another item by the police could have transferred thompson's dna from that item to the mdma whatever, i think this 'contamination' needs to be further explained publicly to eliminate any accusations of 'tampering' with evidence especially as the mdma would appear to be the largest example of 'commercial' level trafficking
-
THE BOMBERS' DOPING SAGA - THE FAT LADY SINGS
so why then did foxsport publish a whole article based on an anonymous lawyer is that how you prefer your news?
-
THE BOMBERS' DOPING SAGA - THE FAT LADY SINGS
if he's just talking precedent why the need for anonymity no doubt we will see more of this as we did with the essendon supplements support campaign