daisycutter

gbh does wonders thank you uncle

so pick 18 for next year's pick 18 means we get jake for just pick 10......and get to use pick 18 a year earlier.....i like it

even degenerates deserve representation, ernie. sort of like birds of a feather. are you with me? wink, wink, say no more

when did "getting the truth" become an issue for that august profession, ernie? have i missed something?

normal people just call it a bedroom, froggo

it's a type of cup

what's the hurry? we made a generous offer. we stick to our guns or it's the nd

what an action-packed 1st trade day that was another 9 thrill a minute days to go i'm already a wreck. how will i cope?

as should crow ceo's wife next it will be biffo's dog being interviewed

his dad should really keep out of it. not helping anyone

and given his size are unlikely to be repeated at afl level it won't be his pack marking that will decide if he plays afl

votes are being recast as we speak

wow. didn't realise they allowed primary school kids to post on bf

nah, a rainbow robin i think

tending to robin.....shhhh

i'm not worried mahoney will stick basically to his offer because it is essentially fair. eventually it will be accepted. crows won't let him go to the draft let's worry about other fish

hmmmm.......no idea

well that changes it a little, maybe a lot...........good pickup maybe then up the bluff factor and ask 1M/yr for 2 years mfc offers 1m + 1m + 0.5m + 0.5m others forced to offer 1m + 1m and run the risk he leaves after 2 years for nothing becomes more a case of russian roulette

exactly. not only that, but the next year mfc could play hardball and for example pick him up for a 2nd round pick. not saying they would do that but no-one else would touch him so they probably could

correct. but he would be within his rights (and pre-nominated min requirement) to only sign a 1 year contract , but with mfc he could happily sign for more years perfectly legally

can you reword that. i didn't fully understand when jake nominates his required contract price/duration at either psd or nd it is a minimum requirement which the club he goes to must honour but could exceed (e.g. the duration) but jake is only obliged to agree to his minimum. it would be a brave club to take him on 1 year (at high price) knowing he will request a trade at end of year, and hoping they could turn him around during that year. his other option (not really likely) is to stand out of footy. not sure if it is for 1 year or 2 years now

forget it. we aint paying 2 x 1st round picks

this should do plus a packet of chips

if it goes to draft lever can set his price at 1M and 1 year contract. he can also make it clear that he will seek a trade after 1 year if he goes to any club other than melb (just like bucks did with bears). if he gets thru to melb he signs a contract for 4 years worth 3M with year 1 front-ended for 1M. nothing the afl can do about that. bottom line he gets to melb. only hitch is jake has to agree to tactic.

nah, more a depth, utility type. just filler