daisycutter

wasting your time on saty. he's too obdurate to reason with

relevance? they cheated or they didn't. they have been found guilty. of which i am satisfied. canberra had nothing to do with their guilt.

there are other over-riding rules that can come into play, such as those that come with signing on to the wada code which call for the stripping of awards and prizes pertaining to the period of transgression. of course wada leave that up to the ruling body but for the afl to ignore that would bring into question the afl's hypocrisy and right to claim wada compliancy. it's is only "hard" if you refuse to stand on principle and continuously look for excuses to prevaricate and do nothing.

iva, it is the unwillingness of the afl to make decisions and their failure to tackle the issues of drugs in sport (performance or illicit) with any real conviction that drags this issue needlessly on and on, that is prolonging the players' time in the "stocks" (that, plus the bad legal advice that they have accepted over the last 3 years)

why have a commission if their favoured option is to avoid making a decision. surely they are made commissioners to make decisions on the game whether easy or hard, popular or unpopular. or would you rather an organisation run by lobby groups, focus groups and public polls with commissioners replaced by accountants and clerks

the afl actually asked mitchell and cotchin to make a submission re 2012 brownlow. wtf. thankfully both players declined immediately. they are simply incapable of making a clear cut decision and are more intent on finding a way to make a "deal". integrity must be a foreign word to these clowns

you have to feel sorry for the afl. they have only had all of this year to decide on the brownlow if the appeal against cas was not successful (as widely expected) and now they need just another month to just have a meeting. running a footy comp is such hard work and people expect too much of them

they'll have to decide on his inclusion in the all australian side too - hehehe or maybe they'll decide that in a later meeting......maybe a focus group? too many decisions for poor old gill. he did say back in august that the brownlow medal decision might be the hardest decision anyone had to make in their whole life......nearly had me in tears

afl to have a meeting on nov 15 to decide fate of jobe brownlow medal - weak, gutless [censored]s

depends, iva, whether you believe someone who has completed his punishment should continue to be punished (in some form) or allowed to start again.

maybe it was just a reflection of his opinion on trade week, ernie

think you'll find that we only ever talked of around about (unqualified) 2nd rounder. i.e. it was open to interpretation

wrong again. i won't explain it in detail because you'll just go off on another strawman anyway

so, you've changed your mind now? from " nobody foresaw that the EFC players would be banned" to "it could have gone either way"

plenty on demonland did. club must have thought it was a chance.

hehe, next years pick is gonna slide a lot more

apparently all his mates were charged with budgie smuggling but biffo got charged with sparrow smuggling

I wouldn't fret too much, uncle, over biffo's (temporary) absence. I understand he already on a flight back from malaysia after his involuntary detention following a misunderstood attempt of multiculturalism. a much chastened biffo i might add, with a lighter wallet.

hey froggy, we need you to get to work and find out what jesse is up to over there. we want all the details. i know we can count on you

that would be doubly climactic, uncle. definitely a coronary overload to be avoided on sunday. sat night?......well that's a different story

does year 8 mean "school-year-8" i.e. probably under 15's?

nervous times ahead, red. i hope they blitz them in the first quarter for the sake of my blood pressure

so ladyboy shows have gone politically correct too. the world has gone crazy. the stuies are taking over