daisycutter

if it had been done by a captain's call for a count..... then.....how would the umpire (on the spot) necessarily know how long the extra player was on the ground and even if he did what had been scored. remember this would be in real-time so....the only option that makes sense in this scenario is to wipe the whole score of the offending team. this is what happens in most other jurisdictions if decided after the game the afl at least has precedents to alter the final outcome of a game and i don't see a problem as long as it is just and fair it matters not a whit whether it was intentional or not

i think the default is to erase the total score. there is often no way for the umpire on the spot to determine the duration of extra player and score for duration if the captain called for a count and the count was > 18 then i think the umpire has no option but to scrub the WHOLE score (for that team), then continue game

if north adelaide had any integrity they would declare themselves guilty and concede the game to woodville the decision by the one man tribunal was pathetic and gutless. replay the game - laughable norwood should refuse to participate in the grand final woodville should take out an injunction

has he accepted or will appeal?

to late, special robert pounced

if they had your mobile phone no they would have also sent you a text message. i got both (text and email)

i love it #adoptadocker this could go viral

heard on radio that someone has added an extra flight on friday too

expect vanders will get one soon

how about woewodin's run and bounce goal starting deep in the backline, virtually straight thru the corridor

well for starters, the mcc and afl members must be a big figure then you have the corporates etc

am i right in thinking that you can't specify a preferred category in the ballot? i.e. if you wanted standing room you couldn't nominate and could end up with category 1

definitely favoured the filth

no goldsack wasn't out of form, just out of game time like jack viney. goldsack is more of an experienced known quantity too having said that, goldsack was still a risk. hunt would be a bigger risk (and i'm a hunt fan)

i only got mine 15 mins ago.....so wait a little longer

just watch he doesn't pay you in counterfeit money or dubious substances. uncle bitters will attest to his "entrepreneurial" habits

hey special, did you come into some ill-gotten gains, i can't remember you paying for anything.....and cat1 to boot......way to go man

you'd pick a guy who's been out of form all year and was just 'ok' in the vfl? bit late in year to speculate #nochangedees

great pic

Came across this youtube video - Some great goals i'd completely forgotten about - enjoy Edit: there is even a jb goal there just for od

i checked all the myriad weather sites. max temp varied from 20c to 25c. all said partly cloudy, low wind. Some said low chance (10 to 40%) of light rain but late in the day. sounds similar to our round 22 game in perth

i would imagine that the person logged onto the ticketek account is the only one who needs to be successful i'm not sure if at the ballot time, that virtual seats are allocated but if so bear in mind that as time goes on in the ballot the availability of say 6 seats consecutive becomes less and less possible (compared to say 2,3,4 etc). so it may be wise to split to smaller group.

how many rewards do they need. they get the double chance plus home ground advantages.

jv got them shaking in their boots already

i'd think a fair few of those 40+k would be priority 3, plus a number of the remaining wouldn't be going for a variety of reasons, so priority 1 and 2 members might have a pretty good chance. The risky ones might be those who have specified a largish block of seats, given that it's all or nothing. A good strategy might be to split largish blocks into smaller blocks........just thinking out aloud next year will be much harder with more members in total plus more members being prepared to pay the GF guarantee given our prospects are now so rosy