daisycutter

i have never heard an umpire say a tackle after a kick was a free because the ball was > 5m away. They always say late tackle. i.e. a tackle after the ball was kicked. now it may be true that in a split second the ball has travelled 5m but no-one uses 5m as a yardstick because it is impossible for an umpire to measure with the speed of a ball immediately off the foot you might get away with a split second late tackle depending on force of tackle but there is certainly no guarantee. very hard for an umpire to determine a 'split second late'.

you can't tackle/bump a player after he has kicked the ball. it must be only while he is in the motion of kicking. you could probably give a bit of leniency for being a split second late but any more time and it is a free up the ground are you saying i can tackle/bump a player after he has kicked it as long as the ball is within 5m? how could you possibly measure 5m when it is a normal kick immediately after contact with foot? it has always been judged on time after disposal. late is late.

no you are not. he made up th 5 m rule, it doesn't exist for someone who has just kicked the ball hit someone late after disposing of the ball is a free kick every day, and based on lateness, not 5m now whether it is reportable is a different matter but got nothing to do with a mythical 5m

well i'm not joining the girls misery club i'm still optimistic about the future (maybe not such much the rest of this year) we're definitely on the move.......rome wasn't built in a day, despite wyl's demands

whatever gaff's nominated club offers has to be matched in $s and no of years - simple it's not an auction

he seems to think he can play like pendlebury and hold the ball as long as likes

only if you believe the "reported" figure they are generally exaggerated for click bait

yes, i just went to the supermarket and saw the price of bananas

thread? football? dementia?

wgaf? when it's bananas, i do ?

yes......but is it real or artificial......call me a skeptic.......why not say so?

Ingredients Reduced Fat Milk, Sugar, Flavour, Emulsifier (471), Vegetable Gum (407 -don't see any banana in the ingredients -curious

please don't let this pizzant thread make it to 4 pages......

and home was a shoebox on the side of the road?

another accumulator

just an accumulator. no impact.

one doesn't have to match weagles offer. it is the other way around. player first nominates (say) melbourne. melbourne offer 4 years at 800k. weagles then have to match that offer. my reading is they have to match both years and amount per year.....or of course exceed them i.e. i don't think 6 years at 600k matches or exceeds even though total amount is greater (3.6m vs 3.2m) i could be wrong.......anyone have more info?

not sure why posters talking of trades wrt to gaff the big attraction to us is that he is an rfa and trade free yeah, i know weagles could match offer and then it's trade time, but if it came to that we would not be interested

can't help you using a phone. i was referring to a mouse on a pc

play youtube video. right click on video. click on "copy url address". back on demonland. input screen. right click. select "paste". wait a few seconds after url adress appears then the image shows. easy peasy

family videos, moonie?

actually the more sensible logic the family is in melb

haha they're thinking of renaming werribee biffoland

i'll bet you still have csr golden syrup on your weet bix (or did you prefer the treacle)

and a tablespoon of cod liver oil for you, od