daisycutter

depth - yes, future star - not really

i think a lot of these sm attacks are more about trolling than racism it's all about maximising outrage and attention seeking by some sad individuals

he's not a natural footballer either i don't understand why a few posters keep pushing him.......based on what?

maybe he was under instructions to not get too far up the ground and be able to present more as a forward? i always hate it when we get a quick turnover and nobody is there or maybe he is just lazy as you indicate?

I didn't watch the game live ....but melkshams stats don't look to bad for a fwd 14 disposals 5 kicks 9 handballs 3 marks 3 tackles 1 goal everyone has canned him but there seem plenty of others who were pretty quiet so can someone explain pls?

well far be it for any senior management at the filth to micromanage the fd ?

just a wild guess.....

you don't like murdoch?

i don't think simon is introspective enough to know where he went wrong....just like chairman dan

time to try jim's idea i think

i've got android, someone else will know

have you tried shutting down the browser (i.e. really killing it) then restarting browser from scratch i seem to remember once my browser going full screen once. never found out why, but circumvented it by restarting

may as well not bother training the way they are playing

dunno......that was a quote from the hun, not from me

so od, this is not the end of the beginning or the beginning of the end , but the end in sight ? hard to argue with that

no such thing as a "ball release" this is just garbage verbiage and implies a player can just drop the ball there is correct or incorrect ball disposal i.e. a handball or a kick martin on a number of occasions was well tackled and just let the ball drop fwd (deliberately, i.e. not knocked out by tackler) off himself to the favour of his team mate without a blink from the umpire. they have this strange rule in their mind that if the ball stays in play it is a good thing despite incorrect disposal.

no excuse for losing, but how is that the umpires can change the rules for holding the ball, not just this game but this round all after clarkson complained tacklers aren't being rewarded again the afl/umpires change the interpretation quietly mid season with no warning i'm sick of the amateurish way of running the rules of the game p.s. yet dusty martin when tackled with no prior can just drop the ball in front of himself and not be pinged

any chance we could get mark neeld back for the rest of the season?

should merge with freo - melbourne wanchors seems pretty apt

dumb.....dumb.....dumb.....under 10 errors and decision making did i say DUMB

this team would have the iq of a filth supporter's false teeth

we are the turnover kings.......pathetic decision making time for a(nother) re-build

and my main argument is (progressively) roll back lots of the rule changes/interpretations made at the coaches behest which aid defensive tactics and athletic skills over individual intuitive skills. This could take 3-5 seasons. announce initial changes as part of a master plan (blueprint) so all vested interests are aware of directions and reasons and can "get on board" don't introduce new rules that have never been part of the game. only consider such changes if the first approach is not enough finally all existing coaches are banned from participating in any way (i.e. committee, consultant, advice etc). coaches are what got us to this situation and have conflicting interests. ex coaches are fine (within reason)