daisycutter

haha yes, especially with reduced player lists and reduced salary caps. ideal time to get into a bidding war

at least max would be safe (and spargo gorn)

of course it's a bit yucky (well more than a bit), but aren't we just talking about it as a short term measure to repay debt. beats going bankrupt and into oblivion

we should bring back long sleeved jumpers and jumbo shorts to increase advertising space opportunities.....you know it makes sense

besides it's a proper noun so doesn't count

outstanding effort, ds. I bet you prune all your roses to ground level my mother-in-law would approve. she always criticises her daughter as someone who'd "talk to a brown dog". I've always wondered the relevance of the dog's colour.

sheesh moonie, how many you now got on ignore? wonder what the demonland record is.....andy?

which we did in the round 16 same year rematch........lost by 7 pts after having a commanding lead at 3q time

decline of capitalism or decline of public morality...........take your pick

maybe by your logic we should start buying up brothels ?

oh (censored), this thread made it to the third page........unbelievable

well that is one way to express it, albeit a very negative way far more constructive to say "assisting via their organisation's support in the survival of the AFL competition."

well i'll be buttered on both sides good catch, chelly

please don't let a thread about a hutchy pathetic clickbait comment reach a third page..........enough already

bennelli sounds even cooler

atm there are probably 5 players with an existing contract past year-end who would consider themselves very lucky if they are exempt from pruning. agree this not very sensible and they might develop an exit mechanism, but it will be messy whichever way it goes.

yes, i wondered about that possibility. even if not over the revised salary they may be with min payment requirements to pay those re-contracted out of the remaining players to make up the new list numbers i think one way or the other (voluntary or not) existing contracts will be renegotiated within certain guidelines.

here's luci's list - so 22 contracted beyond 2020

ok, gotcha, muonie

only if wearing full ppe

sienfeld also said "if you want to be a life-long loser join demonland"

maybe he means the proximal end of his extremities?

now you tell us? sheesh

not a stupid idea, moonie you also left out aflw requirements. these could stay at casey and they could occasionally use gosch's and vice versa the afl side. gosch's would require some community benefit facilities to attract funding, if others can manage this i don't see why we couldn't. gosch's would also need some decision on soccer/nrl. can't see all 3 staying harmoniously. at least one would need to leave.