daisycutter

that would be plan mb, right?

luxury....in my day we had no choice....rough as sandpaper and sharper edges than a barber's razor and you try to tell the young people of today that....they won't believe you

only 7 years!.......wtf

68 games actually....for threepeat

and now for something completely normal bananas might fly....................pig rrrrz you say...............read on flying bananas

excited? nah, what's to get excited about, still haven't beaten any side above us

surely there is no way known the afl would take legal or otherwise advice from someone like slobbo

you quoted $900 not $900k adonski and i wondered whether you made a mistake or were being a little bit naughty

....and he doesn't even cop a fine? sweet jaisus

did you intentionally mean $900?

thanks for those spells, ds. hope the sacrifices weren't anybody important.

couldn't find a link. does this apply from this week?

any chance you could conjure up a few spells for fritta? maybe toss in a few sacrifices to appease the footy gods?

weather forecast has improved coldish (15/16 deg at start of play), light wind, quite low probability of rain

more my sarcometer needing its batteries recharged.....lol

don't know ht, never been there.......very finnicky about contamination

good frame shot fritta is low and forearm would normally would be a chest high self protection/fend off north player is also coming in low and hard and appears to be pushed by trac huge potential for head to head clash. push by trac could be argued to be contributory. conclusion: fritta didn't have much choice......toss in north player played out game with no lasting impact

fair enough re other incident....was too blurry for my (aged) eyesight. strange it wasn't at least reviewed.

trouble is, from the vision i've seen (very distant) there is no evidence of more than a free kick if you have better vision, i'd like a link

and also protecting himself from a potential head clash he could sense he was in trouble of being injured.......just watch it frame by frame

nah, even if you are right there is no proof to link the two incidents and it would look like a red herring and plain desperation. there is plenty of other better arguments to get fritta's action downgraded to a fine let's just hope that his advocate does a good job representing him

got my email(s) last night. i can book from 3pm today barcodes are exactly the same as before, so you should just book at same time with same barcode to be safe you could just ring club this morning

i would add "fend and protect his injured hand" somewhat changes the context

i wouldn't call a defensive motion a strike, but ymmv

if you watch it frame by frame, as he takes possession of the ball his arms outstretched with his broken right hand the closest part of his body to the north player who is only a foot away and closing. self protection for his broken hand would dictate he folds his arm at the elbow with his forearm now protecting his hand. at this stage he is slightly crouched with knees bent and both feet firmly on the ground. unfortunately the north player comes in low, so a fend that would have been to the chest becomes head high what choice did fritta have (viney defence, and others), especially trying to protect his injured hand i'd be bringing in a biomechanics expert he has a good case based on this, plus when you also add low impact because player played out game with no resultant injury (outcome argument) fritta cleared to play by tribunal