daisycutter

thanks for explanation.....quite obvious really for me personally i hate the pregame game stuff anyway so always bypass it. I'm often watching something else on another channel that finishes at 7:30, hence my preference for game start at 7:30

why 7:20? why not 7:00 or 7:30 which better aligns with tv programming times i'd prefer 7:00 personally but even 7:30 would be better than 7:50 (talking game start, not pregame stuff)

i think you miss the issue of the discussion it was what was the status of the knowledge of covid vaccines 12 months ago......i.e. indeterminate i fully support the onshore manufacture of mrna with current knowledge

pffft yourself, 12 months ago we didn't even know if there would be a successful vaccine, let alone whether the mrna variant would be the better approach 12 months ago there was even scientists saying it could be 5 years away no need to reinvent history

i didn't say it was a good idea, od. i was pointing out you would need to have had 2nd dose and most punters who have bothered haven't had the time yet for 2nd.. btw i have a card saying i've had the first dose

first or second vaccination? second is 12 weeks after first so very few people have had second needle (excepting category 1a )

was on ch9 news

i'll take your word that jacko was closer, though the angles of the video can be distorting another hypothetical is whether a player in this situation can handball a behind after the siren. in this case a left hand handball i don't see why not.....it's a legitimate disposal

a lot depends on how the clock would have been milked or not if the siren went then would have just gone for the point if played on quick enough could have gone a check side kick would have preferred spargo to jacko

the one closest to where ball went out of bounds though in this case it might be hard to adjudicate

i don't think it's conclusive that spargo touched it based on that video slow motion with zoom might help, but that clip only shows he "might" have. at least imo if he did touch it then no deliberate, as i understand the rule

i think that goes without saying, jontee

bring back eddie as club dictator and bucks as coach for life would be such bliss

wikipedia disagrees

the club, the board and ceo have publicly stated it is a high club priority they have been saying this for some years judging on demonland the membership is also very vocal when a decision is made it will still take a few years to implement every year of delay the options diminish and the cost rises i agree we have coped reasonably well with the combination of casey/aaami/mcg but the current situation is sub optimal and is not a long term solution. the club has been in review mode for years with no solution announced.

i'd love to be a fly on the wall at the afl CGP meetings (Clash Guernsey Panel) what a hoot

i dunno.....they say it is great for the newly weds and the nearly deads

relax mfc - $1.20 afc - $4.60

understand your pov, but i think the effect of winning will work the other way.....it will embolden and increase expectation in supporters

i reckon that if we don't get some concrete announcement this year the membership will go on the warpath

be careful what you ask for.... if this was to eventuate then it would be inevitable that australian rules footy would also be altered such that it wouldn't resemble the game that we currently cherish

well picked up on bolton. mr leg. a very smart and skilled footballer

https://www.newbalance.com.au/melbourne-football-club/

i'm fully aware of that my comment was sarcasm on the zimbabwe monetary "system" before it was forced to adopt the usd

seems to work well in zimbabwe