rpfc

Gawn remaining in AA form was never in the cards once Grundy was brought in. It is to add 3 years to his career and develop into a forward that can kick 35 goals a season.

Well that’s a wasted $600k… We just need to commit to what was the intention - Grundy more ruck and Gawn deep forward. Then we need to move it to Gawn’s favour and allow Brodie to play like he is comfortable playing when in the ruck. Gawn holding up the team as he slowly saunters forward from the ruck because we are bereft of faith and trust in our forwards doesn’t help. Nor does our lack of a number 1 forward to make Gawn a point of difference in the pocket. The ruck situation isn’t a problem in my eyes, we are dominating contest and ground balls against good teams and that was one of the worries of being too tall. We just aren’t making the most of our opportunities when past halfway.

We are but Lambs to the Taylor…

Well, what are you doing about it then. You can’t just wallow on it; sacrifice a goat to a witch doctor like I did and improve our chances!

As Griffith intimated in the chat with Andy, Binman and George - they will make sure the 3 ten day breaks are used as an opportunity to get KMs in the legs - but can we put this red herring back in the lake for a second? We lost on Thursday because we didn’t capitalise when we dominated and then got done on the break as we went searching for goals and overcommitted. So yeah, what Jaded said.

They may trade the pick if Reid is clearly No 1 and they know he won’t stick around. But GWS will be well placed too. Or pick 3 flops around those picks… Freo have to finish bottom 5 for us to be a chance IMO.

They need to commit to one forward, and one in the ruck. Sometimes we slow movement into the forward line so Max can get down there from the ruck… Slowing ball movement. In this team. They need to play their actual role and it will be much better. If you are in the ruck then set up the wall, if you are forward, then lead into the hole. But because Max and Pretty much everyone has zero faith in our forward execution - they flood him forward at all opportunities. Frankly, these two are not our concern - some of their play is a symptom of our broken forward connection and setup and lack of craft.

For Petracca and Oliver - I am pretty sure Cal Twomey or Mitch Cleary reported they are on a percentage of the cap. So as it goes Up during the decade - their salary will go up pro rata. Pretty good value on all of them I reckon.

If ESS pull off a win, they are a better team than I give them credit for.

It’s learned behaviour. And it’s why I worry for JVR’s development; if you don’t expect the extra handball in board to then get a deeper entry, or you don’t expect the lowering of eyes to hit up someone 60 out then you go where you think the ball will be. And then that’s where the ball will inevitably go. The odd occasion we give an extra hand and take the extra half second to hit up a lead may end in failure which reinforces the ‘bomb it forward’ mentality. It’s harder to see forward craft ahead of the ball on TV but when I was down for Freo, Carl, and Coll games - I was left worried about JVRs leading habits and the role he was asked to play. He’s a kid and has time but it is simply unfair to him and to our window to not get him and Fritsch a number 1 tall forward that pushes them into more comfortable roles.

We won Kings Birthday because of our defence and our press. We are a defensive first team. But being unable to score more than 70 points is unsustainable in the long run - pressure lifts, mistakes are made, talent breaks through. So we need to find some structure and trust with how we bring the ball into the forwards and how they navigate space or we make it so difficult for ourselves. Long term - Lamb needs to get us a number 1 forward next to JVR and we need some new ideas to take control of our forward line and our ball movement into the forward half. Territory isn’t enough anymore.

Not if they have strained their hamstring. @Webber - bat signal.

Here we go again… I don’t doubt that these 3 10 day breaks have been peppered with running blocks but can we put that to one side? The genesis of our issue was not that last quarter - it was our inability to construct deep and meaningful forward entries when we were winning the contest and territory. And applying amazing pressure as you note. Like last year - I am ignoring the ‘red herring’ of loading to see if there are broader issues and there are. There just are. We are really not creating good forward entries against good teams and it’s making it harder to capitalise on and score goals.

We overcommitted trying to score ourselves. But that is just a symptom. The reason why we over committed is because the players were feeling the pressure of having the ball, dominating the contests and stoppages and yet we couldn’t get good looks and kick goals. So they crab walk forward hoping to get it done and then turnover or lost contest and slingshot and we’re stuffed. When you play a press, one problem is in no way can you allow teams to get over it - it’s curtains - no one is on anyone and all the space is a funnel towards their goal.

They are not creating good chances against the best teams. It’s not simply ‘executing’ better in the 50. We don’t get it deep, and the amount of times we wait for Gawn to setup down there leads one to believe that we are bereft of ideas and forward options, especially ones we want to move the ball quickly to.

We just don’t look dangerous going into our forward line and there is no structure that the forwards seem to fall back on. Teams can then easily bottle us up and the slingshot at the end was magnified by the players having little faith in the forward craft of the players to get it done. Overcommitted, crowding in, and bang - out the back and we’re done. Our saving grace is the evenness of this season. But yeah, there is no hiding our issues atm. Don’t talk to me about ‘kicking straight at goal’ - we are getting terrible entries and shallow looks and that leads to more points than goals.

Mitch Cleary just tweeted that we won tonight’s game by 6 goals and then deleted it two minutes later…

Dees, PA and Coll are not good enough to go 28 wins from 30 games.

Would you retire if you were a chance to play in this team?

I would do all this and get Ben King or whoever, but lots of ifs and buts to get there. I just don’t think we have the cap space without doing the above.

Wayyyyy ahead of you, legendarily troubled and deceased movie star actor Steve McQueen…

Free entry to Kings Birthday?

Horses for courses so to speak and I think that’s right. My main worry is that doesn’t allow the forwards to have continuity and build trust with play and performance. I hope that matchups issues like this is the exception to the rule - and that whatever we go with, it is given time to gel.

It is from where I sit. Especially considering how good a backman he is.

I agree that the experiment should continue but it is far from crazy to move him back. He is an elite backman and Smith did more than enough last week to get the FD thinking about a smaller forward line that can compete in the air but make our team defence even more potent.