Jjrogan

Spargo, pretty remarklable he's an AFL predominant forward who's kicked just 1 goal and 4 goal assists in his last 11 games. Average of just 3 score involvements. Its not like his tackle or pressure numbers are off the charts to compensate. His ceiling is just too low for that position but his floor is def higher than anything else we have, therein lies the problem really.

West Coast are rubbish sorry. They've just recorded the worst 6 game stretch clearance numbers in the modern era, twice as bad as any other team. Also twice as bad as being scored from stoppage as any other team. Our mids, yes. been struggling from stoppage all season, but if they cant beat the worsr team over the last 25 years in this 'space' you can forget the 'learnings'. We are nowhere near that bad and should bully them and have plenty of first use. Im not certain Mcqualter knows what he's doing with personnel and game plan at all. The only concern is Jake Waterman. Harley got his usual highlight reel hype at last years match, but it was Waterman's 13 marks (5 contested, 6 inside 50) who was unstoppable He's one of the few forwards that can beat May at his own game. We need Turner to be ready. Allen is no mug either and due to have a game.

And that coward was jailed. Was that a deterrent here? Do we keep locking up people until it stops? Surely not, there has to be level of degrees. Blood bayers was a strong term, I didnt mean it directly at anyone on the forum. The question is why do people want him jailed? For being a threat to society? (Dont think anyone is suggesting this). Do folks want to lock him up as a punishment (I do agree his fine was utterly pathetic, should have be an extra zero). Or is it as a deterrent? Ok, i get that argument but then we have to be ready to extend it out to 10,000s of assaults nationally. Singling him out is the opposite of fair justice according to me.

Serious question. Would you jail connor nash? (The victim im the Balta case didnt get a concussion and had a 3 cm stitch i believe as a point of comparison). Do the rules of the land stop once you cross the white land. Should Miers have reasonably expected that contact? What about off the ball incident. Genuinely asking how we think about the difference in crime and punishment. I dunno.

Yes seriously. I'm not condoning what he did. It was a dangerous and thug attack. As you say, there is no place for this. But if you jail every first time offender for a punch or an assault you'd be needing a lot more cells. The sentence is pretty consistent here.

How do you feel he was lucky to avoid jail? According to the nsw bureau of crime brief (2011), first time assault offenders on an assault occasioning actual bodily harm were jailed 6.9 percent of the time. He would have been un lucky to get jail. Maybe a suspended sentence may have been more appropriate being a public case (whatever that means) but i doubt even that would appease the blood bayers.

Exactly. Most of our goals, in the first half in particular, were the result of individual brilliance rather than great ball use. Long shots sailing through, great snaps or goals from the goal square. Importantly, as you said, it wasnt to an outnumber which gave us a chance. That was pleasing. 7 marks from 50+ inside 50s is bog ordinary. Almost every premier (since ever) has been in the top 4 of the league average, usually north of 12. Sometime you win the way we won on the weekend, amazing conversion, good team pressure and some individuals match winners. But as a system, forward entries were really only marginally better than the rest of the year. It was a small step in the right direction though, until we can get 10-12 marks a week inside 50 regularly, we wont be the real deal.

I like it. We still have a midfield that can bully the opposition, but we must get some (early) return on it and we're a chance. Would help if viney oliver langdon and a few others hit the scoreboard. They all get their chances but choke inside 50 time and time again. Expecting our front 6 to kick a winning score is huge ask. Push forward and snag a few

I know its been slim pickings but our named forward line has kicked 8 afl goals between them for the year.. thoughts and prayers for the Fremantle backline.

He mentions him at 5:40 as one of the central people that drove the philosophy to keep having a crack due to free agency and expansion teams eroding the value of the draft.

As bad as it sounds. IF AND ONLY IF HE WAS OK WITH IT, what would you trade him to the cats or a pies in 2026 if we were bottom 3 again. 2nd rounder?

Or moved back. Perty or May forward. So what everyone gets wrong abot KPF is its not goals per game but marks per game that matters. Find me a handful of players that average less that 4 -5 marks per games that were elite or those above that who were duds. If you can't meet this minimum by your 3 rd or 4th season you're not going to make it as a KPF.

H Im pretty sure Gawn to be in the 2s was a tylpo. Lol

Langdon Gawn Bowey Melksham 2. Spargo Salem So everyone hates the turnovers, skill errors and lack of forward cohesion and yet every week they get votes. Its bizarre. Its what Goody seems to be doing also. Im rewarding goal assists.

ultimately it might be a form of this gameplan stops the transition movement era. Good old fashion one on one, hold your positions. Beat your man, not the system. Dont allow easy swtiches and midfields be accountable. I think Tigers did it in the second half against Carlton (admittedly its Carlton). Giants also employ at times. Easier said than done but we might get some 'learnings'.

At some point the media, supporters, and coaching staff will come to accept the fact as much as this is about Goodwins's failing as a coach its as much about the failures of the players. You are asking Test cricketers to play 20/20 and frankly, they are just not good enough. I see a team attenpting to play fast, corridor football but they continually turn the ball over and are lost on defence accordingly. Have to start again.

3rd quarter goals. Spargo entry to a leading Petty. Demanded someone lead. Fritsch heads up play on Melksham superb kick to a leading Fritsch Melksham spectacular mark, superb kick to a moving Pickett Good kick from Chandler to numbers, Spargo goal assist to Sharp. The reason why it was good is because of the names it wasnt in the hands of.

Easy up. He'snever been the silkiest user but he did it when it mattered most. Lets's not forgot that 'now and then'.

I really hate to single out a pkayer but JVR is a big problem for our midfield. He refuses or is unable to get separation and lead flat out at the ball carrier (and hsi ball read and bodywork is sub par). He's just not quick enough and his only strength is his pack crashing ability which the game has moved away from. He's taken 6 marks in 5 weeks. He needs to play back or be dropped. At this point its not about confidence, you have to make tough calls and realise he isnt the right piece for this puzzle.

Calculated and confirmed off Wheelo. We've been +5, +5 +8 and -4 so far. Pies and Cats ahead of us. Hawks and Saints just below. Port, NM and Rich make bottom three.

The scary thing is thru the first month we are actually top 3 in the comp for turnover difference and created more turnovers than the opposition for our first three games. And bottom three from scores from turnovers. Aye caramba.

Just to deep dive on this further. For kicking efficiency for 2024 (and years prior it does looks the same), I agree the 'issue' is indeed Oliver (55 percent) and Viney (53), to some extent Petracca (63) but not Lever and May who were the highest kick efficiency (83) for us last year and ranked in the top 40 for defenders (even adjusted for May kicking in). Their foot skills are fine and appropriate to the comp average for their position (if not above) throughout their careers but maybe their errors hurt the scoreboard so supporters notice them more. Efficiency is one thing but where it really hurt in 2024 was disposal per turnover and disposals per clanger, where Viney and Oliver are both around 5, league worst for guys that get that mucb of the ball. (As an aside, Harley Reid is at 4 and a large part of why I think hes overated) Where I also worry is that the players often nominated as 'good'users, Windsor (57) Kolt (47) and Kozy (57l are yes better, but they are far from good users with respect to competition averages. You'd want them to be your worst users, not your best. (Small sample size admittedly). Thankfully Langford and Lindsay look to be elite. To give a random conparison, Adelaide last year Laird (60), Scholl(66), Crouch (61), Soligo (55), Dawson(63). Rankine (60). Point is I think we are significantly off it and personally, with a heavy heart I'd trade those with value in Oliver, Petracca and Pickett for a total of 4 to 5 first rounders and keep Viney (have to).

Not a panacea but some point this year id love to see JVR played at fullback and May play at full forward. (Both played these positions as juniors) May plays in front, really attacks the footy and his marks stick. JVR has never been a high mark player and constantly misreads the flight of the ball, maybe deep down he is better suited to the back line where he can be led to the ball. If this season is indeed gone, then we should throw around the magnets a bit regardless.

We are miles behind . A lot of overrating of our youngsters. Langford and Lindsay are the real deal, clean, thoughtful and reliable with disposal. The rest are cameos at best. Bowey maintains a consostency, but hes never going to dominate or reach AA leve. Mcvee might as a specialist BP thats about it. Years of wilderness ahead i fear