Timothy Reddan-A'Blew

'...nor will the Demons repeat five posters and a shooting accuracy of under 30% in two games running...' June 2023 says hullo: 8.13, 8.18, 8.15, 5.15. September 2023 also gives a shout-out. 😉

( 1. Pls excuse my edit, DD 🙏 2. Midweek frivolity alert 😏 ) You reflect a concern widely expressed across our forum, along with the one about the four northern-state teams being favourite/favoured sons (and daughters) of the AFL. Is it possible this is all the AFL tackling the fixturing mess by stealthily engineering AFL seasons into a best-of-25 Collingwood v The North series? (possibly with a feeder comp of Carlton v The Centre/West?) The phantom of a 'Tasmanian team' being, meanwhile, the AFL's 'look-at-my-other-hand' conjurer's sleight? (For reference, D'landers - and D'luders? - might find the following, as representative of Dr Google's many such articles, of interest. I find myself to be (selectively) susceptible... https://ps.psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/appi.ps.202000348 )

Club taking the no-news-is-good-news approach this week: https://www.melbournefc.com.au/video/1577370/inside-the-four-walls-our-property-manager?videoId=1577370&modal=true&type=video&publishFrom=1718521200001 (Good on him, and all the behind-the-scenes-ers, though!)

So, it's 'Bye-bye, Blake'? 😏

He's PMd me, folks. I'm off to find a good book now...

Thanks, D 🙂 Though I do agree with @Demonland: What freakin' (first) clue?! 😄

Goody comes close. #scandalsoftheturnbullera

Thanks as always, @Demon Dynasty 👍👍👍 'Stats' are always 'in the eye of the beholder' but surely your latest post and interpretation above should allow us to calm down a bit. I will.

Thanks. And that's OK; I know my plaice.

I'll fish a bit further, @Demonstone; I realise there should have been four categories (with examples now): 1. Football related and related to the selected players e.g. 'Scored goal with first kick' 2. Football related but not related to the selected players e.g. 'Share name with Brownlow medallist' 3. Not football related but related to the selected players e.g. 'Born in same month' 4. Not football related or related to the selected players e.g. 'Share name with famous guitarist' Ready, set, go again...

Game in hand, Cool10 😏

@Demonstone, may I request for this, and for any other future mockeries, by you, me or any other bravehearts, that the commonality be nominated at the outset, in one of the three following categories: 1. Football related and related to the selected players 2. Football related but not related to the selected players 3. Not football related. Ready, set, go...

Very 'Now', D! Thenkew.

'YMMV'?

When all our world seems preoccupied otherwise, @Demonstone, a brave venture into Not Taking Things Too Seriously! Power to your arm, Good Sir.

BG: 'A good culture is a team that wins, a bad culture is a team that's losing' There you have it. No more correspondence should be entered into.

That the Club has made a point of creating and putting this on its website suggests, 'He's in!' https://www.melbournefc.com.au/video/1576724/koltyn-tholstrup-vfl-highlights?videoId=1576724&modal=true&type=video&publishFrom=1718175600001

Don't tell me you actually look like that then, Stigga?! 😲 Just the 'presence' the team needs if so!

But will they be coming off their second?...

Perhaps we have the answer now? Trac and Gus. (Spot the common thread...)

Chin up. Too soon?

What's this?...

If ever Colgate-Palmolive (or any other corporate for that matter) wants a broad-spectrum focus group to test their ads, they know where to come now! 😉

'x' the unknown number, so 10 to the power 8, times x, would definitely be Superunknown! 🙂

The new benchmark for agreement, Super? Impressive 🙂 (p.s. I note '10^8x' might describe you?!😁)