Jump to content

What do we think of Frawley

Featured Replies

Posted

I know he did a few mistakes and got in the way sometimes but it was his first game and he would had been so nervous. Someone rang up mmm after the game and said he is a skinnier version of Nicho. Which I thought was harsh. When they told Danny Frawley that he killed himself laughing and said he's a little lean and in two years he will be fine. He has to play next week to develop more and get used to seniors

 

heard the same comment on MMM....

he went at it pretty hard in the third quarter and looks a likely type...

got a taste of it and will be better for it...

agree that he needs to be played but from now on will be on merit hopefully as we start to get players back!!

I know he did a few mistakes and got in the way sometimes but it was his first game and he would had been so nervous. Someone rang up mmm after the game and said he is a skinnier version of Nicho. Which I thought was harsh. When they told Danny Frawley that he killed himself laughing and said he's a little lean and in two years he will be fine. He has to play next week to develop more and get used to seniors

It will take him a couple of years to develop both a bigger body and his game to play a key position. So that's out of the question for a while, and in the meantime we'll have to rely on bigger-bodied players like Rivers, Carroll (and Holland).

But I can see him before the season is out being a much better third tall option than players like Bizzell or Ferguson. Is quicker for a start.

 

ND just threw him onto the half forward line. Its easy to run around and get know where near it when your not used to playing there. I think ND should set him a task this week. Someone like Jericho. Lets see how he goes as a traditional defender before we get more creative.

I think ND should set him a task this week. Someone like Jericho. Lets see how he goes as a traditional defender before we get more creative.

I agree with that Gouga......

As for what I think of him. I think he will be good, if not better, in time.

But I am not sure we saw enough of him yesterday to make a totally comprehensive decision.


I thought he battled yesterday.

First kick was a killer for his confidence, and his kicking style leaves a lot to be desired. And he didn't look that quick either.

On the other hand, Colin Sylvia had a worse debut, had one handball and looked diabolically out of his depth. The pace of the game was too quick for him that day and IMO, so too, for his first 4 or 5 game. But he's come along way since that outing, coincidentally, against the Kangaroos too.

I agree that Frawley should ply his trade as a defender this week and hopefully keep his spot for the rest of the year.

Someone rang up mmm after the game and said he is a skinnier version of Nicho. Which I thought was harsh.

Harsh? Try completely idiotic.

I would have expected Daniher to have an opponent or at least some sort of a plan for him in mind, before he put him in the side. As it was, we went in with too many defenders and Frawley wasn't given a job or much of a run.

Hopefully he gets a job next week and is played for most of the game. We can't judge him until we see him play his natural position, which is down back destroying forwards.

The worse thing that can happen now, is for him to be dropped. He needs at least 2 or 3 more weeks just to get used to the pace and what is required of him.

Funny ..I could have sworn Frawley was to bolster our backline...and then danners throws him into no-mans land.. didnt see that one comong !!! The master-stroke of a genius for sure. who knows...if put down back he might have just blocked the path of a Roo or two ??..Might be hard to swallow that though !! lol

 
Funny ..I could have sworn Frawley was to bolster our backline...and then danners throws him into no-mans land.. didnt see that one comong !!! The master-stroke of a genius for sure. who knows...if put down back he might have just blocked the path of a Roo or two ??..Might be hard to swallow that though !! lol

ND throws around his players like there's no tomorrow.

He likes players to be flexible and have the abililty to to plug holes.

Bruce, CJ, Petterd, Miller, Green come straight to mind.

Fair enough for senior players but youngsters coming thru, they'd like to settle into a position.

CJ suffered the most thru this as he has never settled into a position.

Miller's game on Barry Hall 3 years ago has destroyed him. (or my view of him)

Petterds the only youngster to seem to be okay with being thrown around so good on him.

For me, i'd like a player who's good at his position then a so-so defender and a so-so forward.

Frawley - 2 early 2 judge. Missed 6-7 weeks and has barely played 1/2 a game in the ressies b4 being selected. Still think he'll b exciting though.

Not the best 1st game, but he will be a fine player.


What a twit...

You get a hard, tall backman who moves and thinks as fast as a midfielder and he gets slammed for having a quiet debut coming off a multiple-week injury... Jeez some footy fans are dumb.

He didn't star, that's true... but he's got all the elements... I'm nervous about how LONG it takes him to put boot to ball, I feel he may get caught, but other than that there's NOTHING wrong with how he plays the game... Has 360 degree vision, a good football brain, his mistakes were the kind that could be ironed out in 10 games or even less... Frawley will be a good player...

he will be raved about come seasons end

wait for him to do a job on a franklin or mitch clarke, reiwoldt even

way too early to tell, still needs much development time, sandy...

After his 1st spell on the ground he was put into the fwd. line and archer had him for breakfast.

What the hell is this aobut him being skinny? Have you seen the blokes arms and build? Bloody impressive for a bloke who is only 18!

On the other hand, Colin Sylvia had a worse debut, had one handball and looked diabolically out of his depth. The pace of the game was too quick for him that day and IMO, so too, for his first 4 or 5 game. But he's come along way since that outing, coincidentally, against the Kangaroos too.

Colin Sylvias debut is underrated

I seem to remember the young 18 year old crashing a pack full of hardened AFL veterans and taking out Leigh Colbert with his hip

COlbert left the game and didnt come back on. It told me a lot about the Kid SYlvia


Yeah, he needs to be played for the rest of the season, the FD rate him highly and if he continuously gets game time i think we will see what he is made of and why we picked him up.

But I can see him before the season is out being a much better third tall option than players like Bizzell or Ferguson.

while i agree there it must be noted that bizzels game on sunday was fantastic. also i think frawley is going to be a key position defender rather than a third tall. i think him and carrol will get the talls while rivers takes the 3rd...

...I could have sworn Frawley was to bolster our backline...

out of interest before the game both yze and bate pulled out (i am assuming injured, i havnt read anything about them yet...

could it be that maybe we were going to pull a late change that saw one of our talls not play but had to change things up with the injuries? either that or perhaps ND wanted frawley to be superfluous to our needs so he wasnt under a full game of pressure in his first. fwiw he has spent some time up the ground and on the wing hasnt he?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Like
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 528 replies