Jump to content

Featured Replies

On 7/27/2022 at 1:40 PM, old55 said:

I could care less about spelling and grammar.

 

3 hours ago, Demonstone said:

I cringe at "I could care less", which indicates that the speaker has at least some level of care.

Surely "I couldn't care less" (I have no care) is what they mean.

 

 
22 minutes ago, Spirit of '87 said:

It should more traditionally be “I”, as you are effectively saying “my brother is taller than I am…” 

i.e. “he is taller than I am”

hence “he is taller than I…”

but “me” seems to be the more commonly used these days. 

https://onlinewritingtraining.com.au/than-i-versus-than-me/

The link asks more questions than it answers. For example, who knew that "than" could be either a conjunction or a preposition?

A lot of learnings in this thread. 

 
33 minutes ago, In Harmes Way said:

It doesn't mean a prisoner going back to jail, which is what I'm sure they'd be thinking.

Either that or they'd think it was a Greek bloke coming down the stairs.

Let me vent my spleen a little more.

1.  "You're bias".   You can have bias, in which case you are biased.  It's a noun, not a verb.

2.  "That's cringe".  It may make you cringe, in which case it's cringeworthy.

3.  "Get off of".  An Americanism that just grates.

4.  "Allot" means to distribute, to allocate.  If there is plenty of something, there's a lot of it.


3 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

Let me vent my spleen a little more.

1.  "You're bias".   You can have bias, in which case you are biased.  It's a noun, not a verb.

2.  "That's cringe".  It may make you cringe, in which case it's cringeworthy.

3.  "Get off of".  An Americanism that just grates.

4.  "Allot" means to distribute, to allocate.  If there is plenty of something, there's a lot of it.


Awful, but could it be considered a malapropism rather than poor grammar? 

  • Author
4 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

Let me vent my spleen a little more.

3.  "Get off of".  An Americanism that just grates.

 

You hypocrite! You and Mike coined that expression in the early ‘60’s. Remember this?:

”hey hey you you get off of my cloud…”

 

 

Take a close look at the Collingwood banner on Friday night. There should be atleast one spelling error.  Essendon would be another banner to look out for.

Why dont the dees cheer squad do their banner in latin?

That would P.. Off Collingwood supporters no end.


13 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

I wouldn't class that as a malapropism.

Isn’t a malapropism a knowingly-incorrect usage of a word or term (as opposed to an ignorant one)? Or are you saying that there’s nothing “knowing” about it?

Malapropism is the use of an incorrect word in an amusingly inappropriate way and may be deliberate or accidental, but is more commonly the latter.  

 

 

8 minutes ago, deebunked said:

Take a close look at the Collingwood banner on Friday night. There should be atleast one spelling error.  Essendon would be another banner to look out for.

Why dont the dees cheer squad do their banner in latin?

That would P.. Off Collingwood supporters no end.

*sigh* …would thou couldst, deebunked, would thou bloody couldst.
Sorry, that’s Old English, not Latin. 

I can’t speak for other teams’ banners but in our case you’ll likely never see a mistake. This is partly because we have an elevated platform, the view from which makes it easier to spot anything untoward. It’s also because we’re Melbourne supporters and therefore our I.Q. is not in single digits. Nor is our tooth count, for that matter. 
😁


26 minutes ago, deebunked said:

 

Why dont the dees cheer squad do their banner in latin?

 

All for it. 

6 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

Malapropism is the use of an incorrect word in an amusingly inappropriate way and may be deliberate or accidental, but is more commonly the latter.  

 

 

Not to be confused with mondegreens.

2 minutes ago, Winners at last said:

Not to be confused with mondegreens.

Alex the seal?

13 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

Malapropism is the use of an incorrect word in an amusingly inappropriate way and may be deliberate or accidental, but is more commonly the latter.  

 

 

I see.

So what is the term for a word such as “woke”? Where a word is commonly-understood to be “incorrect”, but forges on regardless to become part of the lexicon?

Is that just another malapropism? Seems like such a thing deserves it’s own term. 


17 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

Alex the seal?

The definitive mondegreen. Well played.

 

There's a bathroom on the right ...

1 hour ago, Demonstone said:

2.  "That's cringe".  It may make you cringe, in which case it's cringeworthy.

Channelling my pedantic grumpy old man persona, I'd also like to ask when exactly 'fail' began to be used as either a noun or adjective.

For example:

The heavy defeat that Melbourne dished out to Gold Coast displayed the flaws inherent in their rebuilding process. The whole thing totally reeks of fail.

I always thought the proper lexical item in this case was 'failure'.

 

 
1 hour ago, Mel Bourne said:

So what is the term for a word such as “woke”?

To say it's a cliched, catch-all pejorative would be to risk straying into the muddy waters of politics.   

 

40 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

To say it's a cliched, catch-all pejorative would be to risk straying into the muddy waters of politics.   

 

Ha! Fair point. Bad example! 

Edited by Mel Bourne


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Port Adelaide

    With both sides precariously positioned ahead of the run home to the finals, only one team involved in Sunday’s clash at the Adelaide Oval between the Power and the Demons will remain a contender when it’s over.  On current form, that one team has to be Melbourne which narrowly missed out on defeating the competition’s power house Collingwood on King's Birthday and also recently overpowered both 2024 Grand Finalists. Conversely, Port Adelaide snapped out of a four-game losing streak with a win against the Giants in Canberra. Although they will be rejuvenated following that victory, their performances during that run of losses were sub par and resulted in some embarrassing blow out defeats.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • NON-MFC: Round 14

    Round 14 is upon us and there's plenty at stake across the rest of the competition. As Melbourne heads to Adelaide, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches of the Round. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons’ finals tilt? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Thanks
    • 104 replies
  • REPORT: Collingwood

    The media focus on the fiery interaction between Max Gawn and Steven May at the end of the game was unfortunate because it took away the gloss from Melbourne’s performance in winning almost everywhere but on the scoreboard in its Kings Birthday clash with Collingwood at the MCG. It was a real battle reminiscent of the good old days when the rivalry between the two clubs was at its height and a fitting contest to celebrate the 2025 Australian of the Year, Neale Daniher and his superb work to bring the campaign to raise funds for motor neurone disease awareness to the forefront. Notwithstanding the fact that the Magpies snatched a one point victory from his old club, Daniher would be proud of the fact that his Demons fought tooth and nail to win the keenly contested game in front of 77,761 fans.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • PREGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons are set to embark on a four-week road trip that takes them across the country, with two games in Adelaide and a clash on the Gold Coast, broken up by a mid-season bye. Next up is a meeting with the inconsistent Port Adelaide at Adelaide Oval. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 177 replies
  • PODCAST: Collingwood

    I have something on tomorrow night so Podcast will be Wednesday night. The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Wednesday, 11th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees heartbreaking 1 point loss to the Magpies on King's Birthday Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 37 replies
  • POSTGAME: Collingwood

    Despite effectively playing against four extra opponents, the Dees controlled much of the match. However, their inaccuracy in front of goal and inability to convert dominance in clearances and inside 50s ultimately cost them dearly, falling to a heartbreaking one-point loss on King’s Birthday.

      • Sad
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 532 replies