Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

The first 15 mins or so of this is great listening if you are interested in hearing a dissection of how our game plan (or lack of) is falling apart.

Edit: starts at about 2:30 mark

 

Nicely summed up in one sentence:

"What I'm seeing is three different strategies, one for each line and they just don't connect".

Though I'd argue that the disconnect between the forward third and the middle is far greater than that between our backs and the middle.

5 minutes ago, Luther said:

Nicely summed up in one sentence:

"What I'm seeing is three different strategies, one for each line and they just don't connect".

Though I'd argue that the disconnect between the forward third and the middle is far greater than that between our backs and the middle.

It's an interesting observation, because I'd say that from back to front our only strategy is kick long to a contest. 

Since our intercept numbers are heavily down on 2018, I'd say that within our system there, if we could move the ball quickly from the back half on turn over, we can score very quickly. Melksham's goal last week was proof of that. It took 4 kicks to score:

* Hibberd's attacking kick into the corridor.

* (dropped by the Richmond player) into Petracca's hands, his kick to Fritsch at half forward.

* Fritsch's kick to Melksham in the square, goal.

Our connection from the midfield to the forwardline is too slow on the rebound or misdirected from centre clearance.

Our connection from the backline to the midfield is too slow and predictable.

Both problems are associated with the midfield though and work rate. Given our alleged fitness levels, it's an intriguing dynamic.

 

At the 5.00 mark he says the footage Garry Lyon showed on AFL360 On the Couch, is how Saints played for the last 5 years.  Can only be Richo's influence.  Worrying.  

A losing strategy at saints and so far the same for us.

Was not a fan of his appointment.  Less so after hearing that.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

13 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

At the 5.00 mark he says the footage Garry Lyon showed on AFL360 is how Saints played for the last 5 years.  Can only be Richo's influence.  Worrying.  

A loosing strategy at saints and not much better for us.

Was not a fan of his appointment.  Less so after hearing that.

Anyone got vision of this footage? What does it show?


6 minutes ago, A F said:

Anyone got vision of this footage? What does it show?

My apology.  Not AFL 360, it was On The Couch so should be in another thread.  Will see if I can find it.

Found it

 

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

24 minutes ago, A F said:

It's an interesting observation, because I'd say that from back to front our only strategy is kick long to a contest. 

Since our intercept numbers are heavily down on 2018, I'd say that within our system there, if we could move the ball quickly from the back half on turn over, we can score very quickly. Melksham's goal last week was proof of that. It took 4 kicks to score:

* Hibberd's attacking kick into the corridor.

* (dropped by the Richmond player) into Petracca's hands, his kick to Fritsch at half forward.

* Fritsch's kick to Melksham in the square, goal.

Our connection from the midfield to the forwardline is too slow on the rebound or misdirected from centre clearance.

Our connection from the backline to the midfield is too slow and predictable.

Both problems are associated with the midfield though and work rate. Given our alleged fitness levels, it's an intriguing dynamic.

Fair point. I do think one of the key elements that makes our connect between the backline and the middle a little better is the fact that May is often taking the kick outs and often hits a target.

Interesting to hear a previous coach pointing out these issues and that the club still haven't addressed it years on.

Also interesting that teams actively target Oliver and Petracca as weak links defensively and try to launch offensive attacks through the players they're on. Also suggest Oliver be played more forward for his own development.

Too many players go at the footy, opposition just wait on the outside. If Melbourne do win the ball, they're surrounded and make poor decisions as a result. Coaches do this on loop to nullify the amount of contests we win.

When the opposition get the ball they maintain possession and play keepings off, and we have no way to combat that. 

They're two obvious strategic things that have brought us unstuck for years now. We are outcoached on a weekly basis. Until we change gamestyle, we can give 110% effort as much as we like, but we will not be a competitor.

Edited by Lord Travis

 

Jennings has just told every club how to beat us and it's unbelievably simple.

Interesting hearing the chat around Clayton and how it was hard to admit things were not working when he was getting plenty of stats. Jennings has made at least 2-3 references of not coaching to stats.

It's sounding a lot like Goody & the playing group are all trying too hard to do too much. The idea of Max rucking back half and T-Mac rucking front half seems like a no-brainer, gets T-Mac involved in the play and maybe works him back into form.

Edit: Everyone is frustrated with Lever, well he is being actively targeted. A lot are frustrated with Clayton, he is being actively targeted. Petracca was interesting, but people don't notice that one as much because he's about the only bloke doing anything the other way.

 

Edited by BW511

Question paraphrased: Can the issues be fixed and can they be fixed quickly?

Jennings answer: It's a 30 second fix. That's just pure strategy and match day coaching.

Pretty damning assessment of Goodwin right there!


3 minutes ago, BW511 said:

Jennings has just told every club how to beat us and it's unbelievably simple.

 

He also has told us how to win and it's unbelievably simple"

Gawn back half ruck. Tom forward half.

Oliver to forward line

Defend further back in the field.

Except that Jennings was part of the coaching group last year.  He was also one of the coaches that voted for Oliver to win our B&F when he was accumulating some very average stats. 

I hope Goody listens to SEN @george_on_the_outer & @Lord Travis.

Maybe things look a lot more complicated and difficult from the inner sanctum and an outside perspective is all it takes.

If Goody and Jennings were great mates, wonder if he's picked up the phone for a little advice?

35 minutes ago, BW511 said:

Jennings has just told every club how to beat us and it's unbelievably simple.

Interesting hearing the chat around Clayton and how it was hard to admit things were not working when he was getting plenty of stats. Jennings has made at least 2-3 references of not coaching to stats.

It's sounding a lot like Goody & the playing group are all trying too hard to do too much.

How to beat us has been known and successful for a very long time:

  • Control via short kick mark (deny our ballistic play style):  Geelong, WCE, Hawks
  • Match in the contest, beat on the spread/outside (too many committed to the contested to stop opp spread):  Lions, Tigers, Pies
  • Drop an extra in defence (to mark our bombs):  Every team has been doing it for the last few years.

What is fascinating is that he was our strategy coach last year.  As he was given the flick one can only assume that Goodwin didn't want to hear these messages from Jennings. 

Will Goodwin now take on board what Jennings has suggested to win...

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

22 minutes ago, Luther said:

Fair point. I do think one of the key elements that makes our connect between the backline and the middle a little better is the fact that May is often taking the kick outs and often hits a target.

I'd love to know what our kick out stats have been like this year. I've found May's kicking out to often be very underwhelming. He kicks to contests far too often.


41 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

My apology.  Not AFL 360, it was On The Couch so should be in another thread.  Will see if I can find it.

Found it

 

Just watched it. It only goes for 3.42 "Red Mist Exposed". There's nothing about the way St Kilda played?

4 minutes ago, A F said:

Just watched it. It only goes for 3.42 "Red Mist Exposed". There's nothing about the way St Kilda played?

Gary calls it the red mist. Jennings referenced Gary's comments and added he thought it's the way St Kilda played 

14 minutes ago, A F said:

I'd love to know what our kick out stats have been like this year. I've found May's kicking out to often be very underwhelming. He kicks to contests far too often.

I can't seem to find anything specifically on kick ins but his kicking efficiency rating is 83.7%. Doesn't help a lot.

5 minutes ago, A F said:

Just watched it. It only goes for 3.42 "Red Mist Exposed". There's nothing about the way St Kilda played?

The st Kilda reference wasn't by Lyon it was by Jennings talking about Lyon's video (if I found the correct video).

Some great points from Jennings and well summed up.. I listened with great attention when he was on earlier  

Anyone get a bit of a feel there are a few sour grapes there though from Jennings?


2 minutes ago, Luther said:

I can't seem to find anything specifically on kick ins but his kicking efficiency rating is 83.7%. Doesn't help a lot.

I feel like May's kicking is all or nothing. He seems to have his 8 perfect kicks out of 10 but his other 2 are howlers

21 minutes ago, A F said:

I'd love to know what our kick out stats have been like this year. I've found May's kicking out to often be very underwhelming. He kicks to contests far too often.

He kicks to Max and it is nearly always to the members side of the ground (or the left when at other grounds).  Very, very predictable.

Haven't seen our kick-in players take a run out of the goal square this year - they may have forgotten the rule changes  allow it. 

7 minutes ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

He kicks to Max and it is nearly always to the members side of the ground (or the left when at other grounds).  Very, very predictable.

Haven't seen our kick-in players take a run out of the goal square this year - they may have forgotten the rule changes  allow it. 

First kick out of the Richmond game May runs out of the goal square, hits up a short target in Hibberd and we quickly slingshot forward. Melksham goals.

 

Great analysis.

Interesting that teams make adjustments when playing us, but we do the same thing week in week out.

Stubborn or deluded. Maybe both.

Just now, Luther said:

First kick out of the Richmond game May runs out of the goal square, hits up a short target in Hibberd and we quickly slingshot forward. Melksham goals.

True.  And it worked because it was unpredictable and rare.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thumb Down
    • 526 replies