11 minutes ago, -Ⓥ- said:

Cerra just re-signed I think

Hogan is also contracted, its a trade so it would be irrelevant 

14 minutes ago, Lord Neville X Flash said:

Hogan is also contracted, its a trade so it would be irrelevant 

He signed last week. He won’t be involved in a trade. 

7 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

He signed last week. He won’t be involved in a trade. 

Why not? Not saying he will be. But 100% as eligible for a trade as any other fremantle player. Also young and from melbourne, so im sure he wouldn't object.

2 minutes ago, Lord Neville X Flash said:

Why not? Not saying he will be. But 100% as eligible for a trade as any other fremantle player. Also young and from melbourne, so im sure he wouldn't object.

When under contract, both club AND player must agree to a trade.  How can you not understand this?

Just now, The Chazz said:

When under contract, both club AND player must agree to a trade.  How can you not understand this?

When did i ever say he would traded if he or the club objected? Fremantle would probably be happy to involve cerra in a trade for hogan and cerra would probably be happy to return to melbourne and play for a club in the 8. What don't you get about that?

25 minutes ago, Lord Neville X Flash said:

When did i ever say he would traded if he or the club objected? Fremantle would probably be happy to involve cerra in a trade for hogan and cerra would probably be happy to return to melbourne and play for a club in the 8. What don't you get about that?

The fact that the previous sentence is fabricated bullsh!t based upon the contract extension both he and Freo willingly signed in good faith about a week ago. Logic isn't your strength mate.

Edited September 11, 20187 yr by Moonshadow

1 minute ago, Moonshadow said:

The fact that the previous sentence is fabricated bullsh!t based upon the contract extension both he and Freo just willingly signed in good faith. Logic isn't your strength mate.

So you are saying because a player has signed a contract, in no circumstances can that player end up at another club via a trade?

34 minutes ago, Lord Neville X Flash said:

Why not? Not saying he will be. But 100% as eligible for a trade as any other fremantle player. Also young and from melbourne, so im sure he wouldn't object.

Clearly Fremantle have no intention on utilising Cerra in a trade, they re-signed him last week. Surely this isn’t that hard to understand. If they were looking at making a play for Hogan they’d already have an idea who what and/or whom they are willing to trade for him. Cerra isn’t one of those players, clearly.

Edited September 11, 20187 yr by Ethan Tremblay

If melbourne offered cerra for hogan i would bet my left nut they would accept it. they signed because hes a good young player, doesn't mean they wouldnt trade him for a good deal.

What was it that George Carlin said again? 

Edited September 11, 20187 yr by Ethan Tremblay

Just now, Ethan Tremblay said:

A rubbish hypothetical. 

This thread is about a Jesse Hogan trade, why did you think i mentioned Cerra's name? For a trade with Thomas Bugg? Seriously, you have no idea if you think Freo wouldn't be willing to give up a 19y.o from melbourne and more for Hogan.

 

A keeper always.

Edited September 11, 20187 yr by Wollongong Demon

Just now, Lord Neville X Flash said:

So you are saying because a player has signed a contract, in no circumstances can that player end up at another club via a trade?

Club and player want to stay together until 2021. Just signed an extention which 99.999999999999% of people would agree means both parties are set. It's not like Hogan, who falls out of contract in 13 months. 

What don't you get about that?

Your left nut will be divorcing you very soon.

41 minutes ago, Lord Neville X Flash said:

Why not? Not saying he will be. But 100% as eligible for a trade as any other fremantle player. Also young and from melbourne, so im sure he wouldn't object.

I can only assume you are coming from the brave new world where contracts no matter how recently signed are not relevant legally, and that even though clubs fabric are built on meaningful relationships, that doesn't matter to this millenial generation? 

Are you from the future?

Edited September 11, 20187 yr by Danelska

1 minute ago, Moonshadow said:

Club and player want to stay together until 2021. Just signed an extention which 99.999999999999% of people would agree means both parties are set. It's not like Hogan, who falls out of contract in 13 months. 

What don't you get about that?

Your left nut will be divorcing you very soon.

Mate, obviously freo want to keep Cerra, and they have convinced him to stay. But just because they want him, doesn't mean they wouldn't trade him for the right deal. And Cerra is clearly happy at Freo, but that doesn't he would love to play in melbourne with his friends and family for a top 8 side. I repeat Cerra is ELIGIBLE to be traded like every AFL player. 

6 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

What was it that George Carlin said again? 

"Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things."

3 minutes ago, Danelska said:

I can only assume you are coming from the brave new world where contracts no matter how recently signed are not relevant legally, and that even though clubs fabric are built on meaningful relationships, that doesn't matter to this millenial generation?

Are you from the future?

See Mitch Mcgovern in an Adelaide uniform next year? He signed this year. Didnt Schache sign with the lions last year?  I don't make the rules but contracts are not in concrete

Edited September 11, 20187 yr by Lord Neville X Flash

2 minutes ago, Lord Neville X Flash said:

Mate, obviously freo want to keep Cerra, and they have convinced him to stay. But just because they want him, doesn't mean they wouldn't trade him for the right deal. And Cerra is clearly happy at Freo, but that doesn't he would love to play in melbourne with his friends and family for a top 8 side. I repeat Cerra is ELIGIBLE to be traded like every AFL player. 

 

4 minutes ago, Lord Neville X Flash said:

See Mitch Mcgovern in an Adelaide uniform next year? He signed this year. Didnt Schache sign with the lions last year?  I don't make the rules but contracts are not in concrete

McGovern signed last year.

Edited September 11, 20187 yr by Ethan Tremblay

6 minutes ago, Lord Neville X Flash said:

See Mitch Mcgovern in an Adelaide uniform next year? He signed this year. Didnt Schache sign with the lions last year?  I don't make the rules but contracts are not in concrete

Perhaps I should have bolded the meaningful relationship component...

By all accounts - McGovern felt aggreived that he took a paycut and Gibbs came in...

Schache wanted to be in Melbs... 

Anyway, lovely hypothetical... and if anything happens this year, I'll buy a collingwood membership for 2019...

On 9/8/2018 at 11:31 AM, Demons11 said:

1 gun, 1 up and comer and a 1st rd pick. Hogan is good but he is not Chris Judd

Well that is good news: heard that Hogan is a nice guy who doesn’t eye gouge or chicken wing. 

 

 

Wouldn’t trade him unless he indicated he intended on leaving. 

this kid is a special talent and you don’t just let them walk out the door. 

If zones are introduced having three key forwards of that quality might become a huge advantage 

9 hours ago, jnrmac said:

I am sure you are high up in Jesse's thoughts...

Do you ever worry about running out of that incredible wisdom of yours?

Too many dreamers thinking Cerra is trade material. Like us trading Viney or Oliver after their first season.