Jump to content

Featured Replies

34 minutes ago, ProDee said:

I'm talking about Islamic adherents in the purest sense.

If someone considers themself a Muslim, but doesn't practice the orthodoxy of the Qur'an then no problem.

You're referencing westernised Muslims, who for the purposes of this discussion I don't consider orthodox Muslims.  There's no ambiguity in Islam.  

The Muslims you're referencing wouldn't attend mosques.  Those that do are not able to befriend the kaffir.  

I've always said that I have no issue with Muslims, because many take out of Islam what they want to in varying degrees.  But I have a massive issue with Islam.  It's insidious and there's NO wriggle room.  It's an all encompassing set of beliefs and laws.  It has complete governance over society.  Study sharia and you'll appreciate Islam and all it holds dear.  It's as much a political ideology as a religion.  

Thankfully, not all Muslims want to live under sharia.  Those that do are a huge concern.

I hear Jacqui Lambie is looking for love. You two could spend post coital hours enumerating the vicissitudes of Sharia law. 

 
1 hour ago, ProDee said:

I'm talking about Islamic adherents in the purest sense.

If someone considers themself a Muslim, but doesn't practice the orthodoxy of the Qur'an then no problem.

You're referencing westernised Muslims, who for the purposes of this discussion I don't consider orthodox Muslims.  There's no ambiguity in Islam.  

The Muslims you're referencing wouldn't attend mosques.  Those that do are not able to befriend the kaffir.  

 

I'm sorry but you cannot define what is pure or orthodox when it comes to Islam. One of my many personal muslim friends is Farid Esack https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farid_Esack#cite_note-3 who I first met 32 years ago, and tips on its head everything you have said. He is not a saint, just a man doing his best to get along with other men and women in the world. I have been in Sierra Leone where the Muslim cleric gets up and recites the lords prayer before a public meeting (in company with the priest, followed by the local priest reciting the Qur'an. I have been invited into the homes of Afghans, Pakistani, Lebanese, Egyptian, Syrian, Azerbaijan, Malaysian, Indonesian, Bangladeshi, Moroccon, Libyan, Mauritanian, Palestinian, Kenyan, Saudi, Yemeni and Somali (and there are more) muslims (both Sunni and Shi'a) and had meals with families and wives and daughters of people who all attend mosque. These are not 'tame' or westernised muslims, but they are human and they are decent, they educate their daughters, they don't necessarily flout local clothing customs, and some of them are very angry at the ongoing incessant slaughter of civilians by western militaries. But they are not preaching kill the infidel or subvert western states to sharia law. I have also met radicals who would happily have kidnapped me and I have had hate spewed at me by men who are muslim. I firmly believe in a secular Australia, with rule of law and a separation of powers as defined by the Westminster doctrine. In the same way we argue over the southern cross, is it a racist symbol (I say no) Islam is argued over. It would be helpful in a mature debate if we went after the real targets which are the extremist sects and called them by their names and not with the use of Islam as a generic one size fits all label. If we use this generic approach to labelling people, I honestly feel like I should refer to the gun nuts in the US that shoot up schools and kindergartens, blowing holes in innocent children and call them Christians, it has the same level of accuracy.

19 minutes ago, DaisyDeeciple said:

I'm sorry but you cannot define what is pure or orthodox when it comes to Islam. One of my many personal muslim friends is Farid Esack https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farid_Esack#cite_note-3 who I first met 32 years ago, and tips on its head everything you have said. He is not a saint, just a man doing his best to get along with other men and women in the world. I have been in Sierra Leone where the Muslim cleric gets up and recites the lords prayer before a public meeting (in company with the priest, followed by the local priest reciting the Qur'an. I have been invited into the homes of Afghans, Pakistani, Lebanese, Egyptian, Syrian, Azerbaijan, Malaysian, Indonesian, Bangladeshi, Moroccon, Libyan, Mauritanian, Palestinian, Kenyan, Saudi, Yemeni and Somali (and there are more) muslims (both Sunni and Shi'a) and had meals with families and wives and daughters of people who all attend mosque. These are not 'tame' or westernised muslims, but they are human and they are decent, they educate their daughters, they don't necessarily flout local clothing customs, and some of them are very angry at the ongoing incessant slaughter of civilians by western militaries. But they are not preaching kill the infidel or subvert western states to sharia law. I have also met radicals who would happily have kidnapped me and I have had hate spewed at me by men who are muslim. I firmly believe in a secular Australia, with rule of law and a separation of powers as defined by the Westminster doctrine. In the same way we argue over the southern cross, is it a racist symbol (I say no) Islam is argued over. It would be helpful in a mature debate if we went after the real targets which are the extremist sects and called them by their names and not with the use of Islam as a generic one size fits all label. If we use this generic approach to labelling people, I honestly feel like I should refer to the gun nuts in the US that shoot up schools and kindergartens, blowing holes in innocent children and call them Christians, it has the same level of accuracy.

Wow. Truly wonderful stuff. Thank you so much!!!!

 
  • Author
58 minutes ago, DaisyDeeciple said:

I'm sorry but you cannot define what is pure or orthodox when it comes to Islam. One of my many personal muslim friends is Farid Esack https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farid_Esack#cite_note-3 who I first met 32 years ago, and tips on its head everything you have said. He is not a saint, just a man doing his best to get along with other men and women in the world. I have been in Sierra Leone where the Muslim cleric gets up and recites the lords prayer before a public meeting (in company with the priest, followed by the local priest reciting the Qur'an. I have been invited into the homes of Afghans, Pakistani, Lebanese, Egyptian, Syrian, Azerbaijan, Malaysian, Indonesian, Bangladeshi, Moroccon, Libyan, Mauritanian, Palestinian, Kenyan, Saudi, Yemeni and Somali (and there are more) muslims (both Sunni and Shi'a) and had meals with families and wives and daughters of people who all attend mosque. These are not 'tame' or westernised muslims, but they are human and they are decent, they educate their daughters, they don't necessarily flout local clothing customs, and some of them are very angry at the ongoing incessant slaughter of civilians by western militaries. But they are not preaching kill the infidel or subvert western states to sharia law. I have also met radicals who would happily have kidnapped me and I have had hate spewed at me by men who are muslim. I firmly believe in a secular Australia, with rule of law and a separation of powers as defined by the Westminster doctrine. In the same way we argue over the southern cross, is it a racist symbol (I say no) Islam is argued over. It would be helpful in a mature debate if we went after the real targets which are the extremist sects and called them by their names and not with the use of Islam as a generic one size fits all label. If we use this generic approach to labelling people, I honestly feel like I should refer to the gun nuts in the US that shoot up schools and kindergartens, blowing holes in innocent children and call them Christians, it has the same level of accuracy.

This is hogwash.  It's just a copy and paste.

Islam is Islam.  You either practice it or you don't.

You clearly have no clue about Islam.

Don't be offended, but you're wasting my time.

1 hour ago, ProDee said:

This is hogwash.  It's just a copy and paste.

Islam is Islam.  You either practice it or you don't.

You clearly have no clue about Islam.

Don't be offended, but you're wasting my time.

i am not offended, you are not credible on this subject, i get that you are scared.


7 hours ago, ProDee said:

This is hogwash.  It's just a copy and paste.

Islam is Islam.  You either practice it or you don't.

You clearly have no clue about Islam.

Don't be offended, but you're wasting my time.

Got it. Thanks Pro. I'll tell the guys at work when I get there. They'll be thrilled to hear that 

1) They're not real Muslims

2) Even if they are, it's not a religion, it's a cult 

 

Now, my question remains.

You say you are such an "expert" on the Muslim faith, and that there is a growing danger of radicalisation. 

What is your strategy for dealing with this problem in Australia? How do we ensure that our community continues to be a relatively harmonious one (which, by any criteria, it is)? How do we keep the communication lines open with the 2% of our compatriots who call themselves Muslim?     

Oh and by the way, I was disappointed with your saying you doubt that I've got dozens of Muslim friends and colleagues. 

 

You may live in a world where lying is the norm, but I don't. I work in international education in a major Victorian university. Hundreds of employees from a very culturally diverse backgrounds - lots of Muslims - we all get on fine. As a family we've got four or five good Muslim friends, and I do volunteer work with refugees. And also, as I said, I've had hundreds of Muslim students over the years, starting with Bosnians back in the mid-90s. 

  • Author
2 hours ago, Jara said:

Oh and by the way, I was disappointed with your saying you doubt that I've got dozens of Muslim friends and colleagues. 

 

You may live in a world where lying is the norm, but I don't. I work in international education in a major Victorian university. Hundreds of employees from a very culturally diverse backgrounds - lots of Muslims - we all get on fine. As a family we've got four or five good Muslim friends, and I do volunteer work with refugees. And also, as I said, I've had hundreds of Muslim students over the years, starting with Bosnians back in the mid-90s. 

I'm shocked that a rabid Lefty works at a University ?  Who'd have thought.

Thanks for fessing up that you have 4-5 Muslim friends and not dozens.  I suspect they're acquaintances and not "break bread and drink wine" type of friends.

As for a strategy to deal with the dangers of Islam within Australia ?  Firstly, don't import anymore.  Don't permit any new mosques to be built.  And monitor the activities of known radicals.  

Islam is completely incompatible with freedom and democracy.  ALL practising Muslims want to live under sharia.  If they don't want to live under sharia they're either ignorant of their own theocracy or pretend Muslims.

Are you familiar with sharia, Jara ?

 
11 hours ago, ProDee said:

This is hogwash.  It's just a copy and paste.

Islam is Islam.  You either practice it or you don't.

You clearly have no clue about Islam.

Don't be offended, but you're wasting my time.

Someone offers up first hand experience and you brush it off as "copy and paste"?  Should we do the same with your posts ProDee; copy and paste from the Xenophobic's Handbook?

1 minute ago, hardtack said:

Someone offers up first hand experience and you brush it off as "copy and paste"?  Should we do the same with your posts ProDee; copy and paste from the Xenophobic's Handbook?

More like the ftinge lunatic right....


  • Author
3 minutes ago, hardtack said:

Someone offers up first hand experience and you brush it off as "copy and paste"?  Should we do the same with your posts ProDee; copy and paste from the Xenophobic's Handbook?

It didn't address a single element of Islam.  It was totally irrelevant.

But, by all means, point out to me the aspects of Islam that were addressed ?

4 minutes ago, ProDee said:

It didn't address a single element of Islam.  It was totally irrelevant.

But, by all means, point out to me the aspects of Islam that were addressed ?

He addressed the fact that those practicing Islam in Islamic states are NOT all out to kill the infidels as you would have us believe.  It addressed the fact that they are open to people of non-Islamic faith or background and it acknowledged that there are fundamentalists who would like to do us harm.  It was, unlike what I've seen from you, a balanced view of Islam as practiced in the physical world of Islam. 

As DD suggested, don't conveniently bundle them all into one little compartment to justify your xenophobic tendencies; recognise those who would like to do us harm for what they are... fundamentalists who do not represent all of Islam... just as Fundamentalist Christians do not represent all of Christianity.

11 hours ago, ProDee said:

This is hogwash.  It's just a copy and paste.

Islam is Islam.  You either practice it or you don't.

You clearly have no clue about Islam.

Don't be offended, but you're wasting my time.

And further to your response to DaisyDeeciple, I find it interesting in light of your first sentence in the opening of this thread:

"There needs to be a mature conversation not the shutting down of debate."

DD's post was probably the most mature and level headed response in this entire thread, yet what do you attempt to do with your response?

  • Author
1 minute ago, hardtack said:

He addressed the fact that those practicing Islam in Islamic states are NOT all out to kill the infidels as you would have us believe.  It addressed the fact that they are open to people of non-Islamic faith or background and it acknowledged that there are fundamentalists who would like to do us harm.  It was, unlike what I've seen from you, a balanced view of Islam as practiced in the physical world of Islam. 

As DD suggested, don't conveniently bundle them all into one little compartment to justify your xenophobic tendencies; recognise those who would like to do us harm for what they are... fundamentalists who do not represent all of Islam... just as Fundamentalist Christians do not represent all of Christianity.

This is disingenuous rubbish.

I've stated clearly, and often, that I have no issue with Muslims.  I have a massive issue with Islam.

Clearly and obviously, not all Muslims practice Islam as it's intended.  However, Islam is unambiguous.  There is no wriggle room.  NONE

I recommend you actually learn something about Islam rather than concentrate on the thoughts and actions of some Muslims.  They are COMPLETELY different issues.

Thankfully, many Muslims are Westernised.  Thankfully, many Muslims don't understand the Qur'an and their own religion.  Thankfully, many who know what's expected of them under Islam don't have the inclination to practice what's expected.  Thankfully, many recognise that Islam needs to be modernised.  Thankfully, more than half of Muslims around the world don't want to indoctrinate the rest of the world.

They're not the ones who concern me.

Like all lessons throughout history, it's not the silent peace loving citizens who present the dangers, but unfortunately, despite their goodwill they don't stop the dangers from happening.

Most Germans weren't blood thirst Nazis.  Most Japanese were peace loving.  And the list of examples goes on.  But atrocities still happened despite their goodwill because the fundamentalists controlled their societies.  We have a very small percentage of Muslims and a very very small percentage of fundamentalists.  I'd like to keep it that way.  Because, as the Muslim population grows so too does the danger to your boy and his future offspring.

13 minutes ago, ProDee said:

This is disingenuous rubbish.

I've stated clearly, and often, that I have no issue with Muslims.  I have a massive issue with Islam.

Clearly and obviously, not all Muslims practice Islam as it's intended.  However, Islam is unambiguous.  There is no wriggle room.  NONE

I recommend you actually learn something about Islam rather than concentrate on the thoughts and actions of some Muslims.  They are COMPLETELY different issues.

Thankfully, many Muslims are Westernised.  Thankfully, many Muslims don't understand the Qur'an and their own religion.  Thankfully, many who know what's expected of them under Islam don't have the inclination to practice what's expected.  Thankfully, many recognise that Islam needs to be modernised.  Thankfully, more than half of Muslims around the world don't want to indoctrinate the rest of the world.

They're not the ones who concern me.

Like all lessons throughout history, it's not the silent peace loving citizens who present the dangers, but unfortunately, despite their goodwill they don't stop the dangers from happening.

Most Germans weren't blood thirst Nazis.  Most Japanese were peace loving.  And the list of examples goes on.  But atrocities still happened despite their goodwill because the fundamentalists controlled their societies.  We have a very small percentage of Muslims and a very very small percentage of fundamentalists.  I'd like to keep it that way.  Because, as the Muslim population grows so too does the danger to your boy and his future offspring.

You seem to have nothing better to do except post racist porn which the moderators of this site allow you to do. Don't you have anything better to do? Let me guess: you're retired? A student? In gaol? A public servant with access to a computer?


37 minutes ago, ProDee said:

This is disingenuous rubbish.

I've stated clearly, and often, that I have no issue with Muslims.  I have a massive issue with Islam.

Clearly and obviously, not all Muslims practice Islam as it's intended.  However, Islam is unambiguous.  There is no wriggle room.  NONE

I recommend you actually learn something about Islam rather than concentrate on the thoughts and actions of some Muslims.  They are COMPLETELY different issues.

Thankfully, many Muslims are Westernised.  Thankfully, many Muslims don't understand the Qur'an and their own religion.  Thankfully, many who know what's expected of them under Islam don't have the inclination to practice what's expected.  Thankfully, many recognise that Islam needs to be modernised.  Thankfully, more than half of Muslims around the world don't want to indoctrinate the rest of the world.

They're not the ones who concern me.

Like all lessons throughout history, it's not the silent peace loving citizens who present the dangers, but unfortunately, despite their goodwill they don't stop the dangers from happening.

Most Germans weren't blood thirst Nazis.  Most Japanese were peace loving.  And the list of examples goes on.  But atrocities still happened despite their goodwill because the fundamentalists controlled their societies.  We have a very small percentage of Muslims and a very very small percentage of fundamentalists.  I'd like to keep it that way.  Because, as the Muslim population grows so too does the danger to your boy and his future offspring.

And again I quote ProDee: "There needs to be a mature conversation not the shutting down of debate."

Way to start a "mature conversation"... and as for that last sentence... refer to the first line of your quoted post.

1 hour ago, ProDee said:

I'm shocked that a rabid Lefty works at a University ?  Who'd have thought.

Thanks for fessing up that you have 4-5 Muslim friends and not dozens.  I suspect they're acquaintances and not "break bread and drink wine" type of friends.

As for a strategy to deal with the dangers of Islam within Australia ?  Firstly, don't import anymore.  Don't permit any new mosques to be built.  And monitor the activities of known radicals.  

Islam is completely incompatible with freedom and democracy.  ALL practising Muslims want to live under sharia.  If they don't want to live under sharia they're either ignorant of their own theocracy or pretend Muslims.

Are you familiar with sharia, Jara ?

Pro - you appear to be functionally literate - would you be a good boy and pop back and check what I actually said before you accuse me of "fessing up" - I said I've had dozens of "friends and colleagues" - which is true. Just because you have a problem with cross-cultural communication, don't assume that others do.

 

As for your "strategy" for ensuring smooth relations between Muslims and the wider community: risible.

 

You boast about being some kind of "expert".

 

What a joke. You're an expert at nothing other than sitting in a dark and lonely room dragging hate-speech in off the net and dumping it on the only website liberal enough to give you an outlet: a football supporters' site (to be fair, you do seem pretty knowledgeable about footy). 

 

If you really want to be an "expert" at something, I'd suggest you look up the Dunning-Kruger effect: you could be a poster-boy for it.

 

 

1 hour ago, dieter said:

You seem to have nothing better to do except post racist porn which the moderators of this site allow you to do. 

This is your final warning. Criticise the moderators / administrators again and you're out of here. 

I'll re-post what Andy wrote in the other thread. 

The General Boards are not moderated like the footy ones. That is mods aren't always available to read these threads. Enter at your own risk and do not bring your fights here over to the footy boards.

I'm very close to banning politics talk here as I don't need the hassle of having to moderate between two sides who are never going to convince each other that their side is right.

  • Author
43 minutes ago, hardtack said:

And again I quote ProDee: "There needs to be a mature conversation not the shutting down of debate."

Way to start a "mature conversation"... and as for that last sentence... refer to the first line of your quoted post.

How you don't think there's a correlation of more danger to society with an increased Islamic population is extraordinary. 

I must be imagining those security checks at the MCG.

As the Muslim population increases as a percentage of Australia's overall population there's greater risk to society.

Do you even do Europe ?


17 minutes ago, ProDee said:

How you don't think there's a correlation of more danger to society with an increased Islamic population is extraordinary. 

I must be imagining those security checks at the MCG.

As the Muslim population increases as a percentage of Australia's overall population there's greater risk to society.

Do you even do Europe ?

It’s obvious isn’t it. 

I don’t understand why it’s so hard for people to comprehend. 

Three killed in Belgium yesterday - the gunmen had recently converted to guess what religion..? 

Edited by Ethan Tremblay

I don't understand why we have to have this type of thread on a footy forum site. As far as I am concerned this is no place for religious or political topics. There are plenty of sites on the internet to discuss these matters if your so inclined.

I realise that i don't have to open the thread but you can't help but see it when looking at the various threads and it annoys the crap out of me.

11 minutes ago, drysdale demon said:

I don't understand why we have to have this type of thread on a footy forum site. As far as I am concerned this is no place for religious or political topics. There are plenty of sites on the internet to discuss these matters if your so inclined.

I realise that i don't have to open the thread but you can't help but see it when looking at the various threads and it annoys the crap out of me.

Sounds like something a leftie would say... 

(Joking) 

 
  • Author
28 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Sounds like something a leftie would say... 

(Joking) 

Triggered !!!

2 hours ago, Grapeviney said:

This is your final warning. Criticise the moderators / administrators again and you're out of here. 

I'll re-post what Andy wrote in the other thread. 

 

99% of the reason another MFC forum was closed down was due to threads like these. I'm not religious so they don't offend me. But I cant see the need for them on an AFL site. 


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 181 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Angry
      • Like
    • 47 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Like
    • 329 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Like
    • 31 replies