Jump to content

Opposition Watch: Rd 1 vs Geelong

Featured Replies

53 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

Danger won't play. Spoke to snr Geelong person today. Said they would be mad to play him if there was the smallest chance he does it badly and misses 6.

Any news on Ablett or is he definitely playing?

 
10 hours ago, A F said:

Any news on Ablett or is he definitely playing?

He said Ablett would play

 

Ablett was always going to play unless he re-injured himself.

Lets be honest, if we had Ablett on our list and he had zero pre-season, we too would back him in. He has enough runs on the board to suggest that even on half a leg at FF he will still do a very good job, certainly better than whoever else would be up for replacing him (Geelong has very little depth.
I suspect/hope Nev takes him when he's forward of the centre, I think they're a good match up.

As for Danger, this is a long season and Geelong are certainly backing themselves in for a top 4 and a tilt at the flag, why else would you get Ablett back? So to risk their best player 2 weeks into a hammy injury, would be sheer madness. Their next game is Easter Monday against arch nemesis Hawthorn, so it gives Danger 4 generous weeks to get himself perfectly ripe.
I think they back themselves to win against us without him, and won't take the risk. 


2 minutes ago, brendan said:

I still can't work out how a player misses just 1 week with a grade 1 hamstring strain?

2 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

I still can't work out how a player misses just 1 week with a grade 1 hamstring strain?

Maybe bomber is back at the club 

 

17 minutes ago, brendan said:

How is Danger a near certain starter if he hasn't even trained yet?!?! That would suggest he's certain to miss

Thursdays teams can’t come quick enough but that probably won’t tell us much I guarantee danger gets named either way 

1 hour ago, brendan said:

Where does it say "Oliver likely to miss" ?  'Likely' being the operative word. 

1 hour ago, brendan said:

The club still expects him (Oliver) to play, but sources have indicated it is too early in the week to categorically lock him in.

Chinese whispers strike again...no likely there as far as I can see.

As I read it...

"Oliver not categorically locked in."

Just our rotten luck.

Danger and Ablett  play and we're without Viney and Clarry to do them both over.

 


5 minutes ago, rjay said:

The club still expects him (Oliver) to play, but sources have indicated it is too early in the week to categorically lock him in.

Chinese whispers strike again...no likely there as far as I can see.

As I read it...

"Oliver not categorically locked in."

Says in 1st line Oliver remains in some doubt, I think he will play I was just pointing out the guessing going on by media outlets they all have no idea what’s going on 

I reckon:

Oliver and Ablett will both play.

Tom Mac and Danger will both miss.

They will come up with sensationalist headlines until the teams are announced to get a few clicks, but I can't see Geelong being dumb enough to risk Dangerfield for just one match.


I won't believe it until he's announced to play 90 minutes before the game when the final team list is in.  

For the record, they're crazy to play him, especially with Ablett going in with no match practice as well.  I actually think it works in our favour to have them playing blokes who aren't 100%.

Maybe I'm just coming up with conspiracy theories today, but I wonder if Oliver's 'knee soreness' is our way of keep them guessing as well.

34 minutes ago, brendan said:

Says in 1st line Oliver remains in some doubt, I think he will play I was just pointing out the guessing going on by media outlets they all have no idea what’s going on 

How do you extrapolate "in some doubt" and turn that into "Oliver likely to miss" ?  Especially when it says in said article "the club still expects him to play".

You surely see the problem here.

 
8 minutes ago, ProDee said:

How do you extrapolate "in some doubt" and turn that into "Oliver likely to miss" ?  Especially when it says in said article "the club still expects him to play".

You surely see the problem here.

It’s just the way I read it, people read things in different ways, again I was trying to point out that the media are just guessing, if people want to only pick up something I may or may not have read differently to them by 1 word well then I apologize clearly I have upset a few posters so for that I am sorry, I will edit my original post as to cause no more confusion 

2 minutes ago, brendan said:

It’s just the way I read it, people read things in different ways, again I was trying to point out that the media are just guessing, if people want to only pick up something I may or may not have read differently to them by 1 word well then I apologize clearly I have upset a few posters so for that I am sorry, I will edit my original post as to cause no more confusion 

No problem.  I just think people need to be careful how they interpret articles they're sharing.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Gold Coast

    The Gold Coast Suns find themselves outside of the top eight for the first time since Round 1 with pressure is mounting on the entire organisation. Their coach Damien Hardwick expressed his frustration at his team’s condition last week by making a middle-finger gesture on television that earned him a fine for his troubles. He showed his desperation by claiming that Fox should pick up the tab.  There’s little doubt the Suns have shown improvement in 2025, and their position on the ladder is influenced to some extent by having played fewer games than their rivals for a playoff role at the end of the season, courtesy of the disruption caused by Cyclone Alfred in March.  However, they are following the same trajectory that hindered the club in past years whenever they appeared to be nearing their potential. As a consequence, that Hardwick gesture should be considered as more than a mere behavioral lapse. It’s a distress signal that does not bode well for the Queenslanders. While the Suns are eager to remain in contention with the top eight, Melbourne faces its own crisis, which is similarly deep-seated but in a much different way. After recovering from a disappointing start to the season and nearing a return to respectability among its peer clubs, the Demons have experienced a decline in status, driven by the fact that while their form has been reasonable (see their performance against the ladder leader in the Kings Birthday match), their conversion in front of goal is poor enough to rank last in the competition. Furthermore, their opponents find them exceptionally easy to score against. As a result, they have effectively eliminated themselves from the finals race and are again positioned to finish in the bottom half of the ladder.

      • Haha
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 15

    As the Demons head into their Bye Round, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches being played. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons if we can manage to turn our season around? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Clap
    • 280 replies
  • REPORT: Port Adelaide

    Of course, it’s not the backline, you might argue and you would probably be right. It’s the boot studder (do they still have them?), the midfield, the recruiting staff, the forward line, the kicking coach, the Board, the interchange bench, the supporters, the folk at Casey, the head coach and the club psychologist  It’s all of them and all of us for having expectations that were sufficiently high to have believed three weeks ago that a restoration of the Melbourne team to a position where we might still be in contention for a finals berth when the time for the midseason bye arrived. Now let’s look at what happened over the period of time since Melbourne overwhelmed the Sydney Swans at the MCG in late May when it kicked 8.2 to 5.3 in the final quarter (and that was after scoring 3.8 to two straight goals in the second term). 

      • Like
    • 3 replies
  • CASEY: Essendon

    Casey’s unbeaten run was extended for at least another fortnight after the Demons overran a persistent Essendon line up by 29 points at ETU Stadium in Port Melbourne last night. After conceding the first goal of the evening, Casey went on a scoring spree from about ten minutes in, with five unanswered majors with its fleet of midsized runners headed by the much improved Paddy Cross who kicked two in quick succession and livewire Ricky Mentha who also kicked an early goal. Leading the charge was recruit of the year, Riley Bonner while Bailey Laurie continued his impressive vein of form. With Tom Campbell missing from the lineup, Will Verrall stepped up to the plate demonstrating his improvement under the veteran ruckman’s tutelage. The Demons were looking comfortable for much of the second quarter and held a 25-point lead until the Bombers struck back with two goals in the shadows of half time. On the other side of the main break their revival continued with first three goals of the half. Harry Sharp, who had been quiet scrambled in the Demons’ first score of the third term to bring the margin back to a single point at the 17 minute mark and the game became an arm-wrestle for the remainder of the quarter and into the final moments of the last.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Gold Coast

    The Demons have the Bye next week but then are on the road once again when they come up against the Gold Coast Suns on the Gold Coast in what could be a last ditch effort to salvage their season. Who comes in and who comes out?

      • Haha
    • 295 replies
  • PODCAST: Port Adelaide

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 16th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Power.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Sad
      • Thanks
    • 33 replies