Jump to content

NAB Challenge Aftermath

Featured Replies

2 minutes ago, DemonDave said:

Port started with one short on their bench, as Wingard pulled out in the warmup, and then we lost Brayshaw in the first 10 seconds, so both teams effectively had 7 on the bench.

oh I take it back then, had they used rotations we would have been flogged

 
14 hours ago, P-man said:

Dwayne commentating GC v WC and has credited Melbourne's second half to the greater number of rotations. You knew he'd be referencing it at some point. Just can't help himself when it comes to the MFC. The only reason he didn't bring it up ten times during the game itself was that he wasn't aware of it. 

love your work P-man but i stopped reading at the first mention of Dwayne.

24 minutes ago, nutbean said:

any charge for a print at home ticket is absolutely a cash grab - nothing more.

you do realise though that administering tickets for an event is a business that requires work/staff/overheads right? It can't just be free. I do not work for such a company btw lol

 

 
5 minutes ago, Curry & Beer said:

you do realise though that administering tickets for an event is a business that requires work/staff/overheads right? It can't just be free. I do not work for such a company btw lol

 

So who pays for the Print Cartridge used and the wear and tear on my Printer when i print out a ticket i just bought??

 

34 minutes ago, nutbean said:

love your work P-man but i stopped reading at the first mention of Dwayne.

i stopped at "dw"


7 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

So who pays for the Print Cartridge used and the wear and tear on my Printer when i print out a ticket i just bought??

 

i presume the abc (ie us) :)

On 2/3/2016 at 1:23 PM, monoccular said:

Saying the jury is still out in Frost is IMO a bit premature.

The prosecution and the defense haven't even completed their cases.

The jury may be listening but hasn't retired to consider their verdict yet. 

He needs a lot more game time to see just where he is best suited, if at all.  IMO it would be great if he could become a tall forward, though Weed and / or Huelett may come into consideration sometime later in the season, depending of course on how the team progresses and if finals are on the cards.  

 

I don't think we'll start to see the best of him,  until he gets this season under his belt.

he personally has a lot of time up his sleeve to get right.

17 minutes ago, Curry & Beer said:

you do realise though that administering tickets for an event is a business that requires work/staff/overheads right? It can't just be free. I do not work for such a company btw lol

 

what a load of shlt.... you do realise it all part and parcel of the cost of business.   FMD  you d have us  paying for the ability to pay at the supermarket.

 

Something cost X..thats all .. you cant turn around and say  its X +  Y ...Y being the actual act of paying for it.

 

DO you go to Woolies  scan  your food.. see say  34.75 ...go to pay and see an additional cost for the ability to pay the 34.75 ?  No you dont. Its just a bloody scam by shlt businesses to gouge

 
Just now, beelzebub said:

  FMD  you d have us  paying for the ability to pay at the supermarket.

 

You think it doesn't?

 

43 minutes ago, nutbean said:

love your work P-man but i stopped reading at the first mention of Dwayne.

lets start calling him 'Downer',  ^_^


6 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

what a load of shlt.... you do realise it all part and parcel of the cost of business.   FMD  you d have us  paying for the ability to pay at the supermarket.

 

Something cost X..thats all .. you cant turn around and say  its X +  Y ...Y being the actual act of paying for it.

 

DO you go to Woolies  scan  your food.. see say  34.75 ...go to pay and see an additional cost for the ability to pay the 34.75 ?  No you dont. Its just a bloody scam by shlt businesses to gouge

Or airlines that quote a price then charge you a fee to use a credit card but they do not accept any other form of payment.

6 minutes ago, Baghdad Bob said:

You think it doesn't?

 

how so ? If I pay by ANY means...I still only pay the 34.75 

2 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

what a load of shlt.... you do realise it all part and parcel of the cost of business.   FMD  you d have us  paying for the ability to pay at the supermarket.

 

Something cost X..thats all .. you cant turn around and say  its X +  Y ...Y being the actual act of paying for it.

 

DO you go to Woolies  scan  your food.. see say  34.75 ...go to pay and see an additional cost for the ability to pay the 34.75 ?  No you dont. Its just a bloody scam by shlt businesses to gouge

entitled

the time of entitlement.  those wonderful  Hockeyism  Liberalist  words,  that are heart felt by business types.  But those same people also feel that all they're tax deductions,  for the wifes car costs,  the kids private education,  &  entertainment, interstate/overseas travel expenses,  and all those lunches, etc etc are all tax writedowns. 

 

entitlement,,,,,, what entitlement ????????

9 minutes ago, ManDee said:

Or airlines that quote a price then charge you a fee to use a credit card but they do not accept any other form of payment.

This was supposedly to be outlawed...  ...... still waiting  :rolleyes:

9 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

how so ? If I pay by ANY means...I still only pay the 34.75 

You pay for the check out person, you pay because the credit card provider charge the supermarket.

It's built in. 


Just now, Baghdad Bob said:

You pay for the check out person, you pay because the credit card provider charge the supermarket.

It's built in. 

well done....That WAS my point... its a cost of business. But its not an addendum to the invoice at time of paying is it.

40 minutes ago, Curry & Beer said:

you do realise though that administering tickets for an event is a business that requires work/staff/overheads right? It can't just be free. I do not work for such a company btw lol

 

Not sure if this went any further but Choice were up in arms about it last year and the ACCC were looking into it.

http://www.smh.com.au/national/ticketek-accused-of-price-gouging-on-afl-finals-fees-20150918-gjq1rm.html

http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2014/10/accc-cracks-down-on-drip-pricing-by-ticketmaster-and-ticketek/

39 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

what a load of shlt.... you do realise it all part and parcel of the cost of business.   FMD  you d have us  paying for the ability to pay at the supermarket.

 

Something cost X..thats all .. you cant turn around and say  its X +  Y ...Y being the actual act of paying for it.

 

DO you go to Woolies  scan  your food.. see say  34.75 ...go to pay and see an additional cost for the ability to pay the 34.75 ?  No you dont. Its just a bloody scam by shlt businesses to gouge

maxresdefault.jpg

obviously we need competition. where is the "uber" of ticketing

someday it will happen and ticketek, ticketmaster will be caught with their pants around their ankles

1 hour ago, Curry & Beer said:

you do realise though that administering tickets for an event is a business that requires work/staff/overheads right? It can't just be free. I do not work for such a company btw lol

 

There are two charges - a processing or booking fee which i have no problem and then you have a delivery fees - you can pay for tickets to be delivered by standard mail, registered mail or you can print the tickets at home.

Many times they do not charge for print at home option -

Tickets/Items

AU $201.76

Handling Charge

AU $5.95

Delivery via: eTicket

No Charge

 

Other times you get charged - as i said - cash grab and as BB said - thieves 


5 minutes ago, nutbean said:

There are two charges - a processing or booking fee which i have no problem and then you have a delivery fees - you can pay for tickets to be delivered by standard mail, registered mail or you can print the tickets at home.

Many times they do not charge for print at home option -

Tickets/Items

AU $201.76

Handling Charge

AU $5.95

Delivery via: eTicket

No Charge

 

Other times you get charged - as i said - cash grab and as BB said - thieves 

Doesn't worry me Nut.  I'd much rather have the convenience of booking and printing at home than having to line up in a queue and get it that way.

What the hell is a "Handling Charge" anyway?  It's a fee they charge to stay profitable and it's an amount they can charge for providing a service someone wants. Same with the Delivery fee really.  I suppose they have to pay for the hardware and software that provides it.  I hope they stay profitable, I like the convenience.

We all have a choice.  Always surprises me how people can get so worked up over such minor things.  Life is too short isn't it?

I have several billers that charge me for them sending me a bill.

The gas Co......Charge me 2.50 for them to send me the bill.

I refuse to pay by direct debit.

If they want to charge me for the gas I use, fair enough.....But I shouldn't be charged for them sending me the bill.

 

37 minutes ago, Bossdog said:

I have several billers that charge me for them sending me a bill.

The gas Co......Charge me 2.50 for them to send me the bill.

I refuse to pay by direct debit.

If they want to charge me for the gas I use, fair enough.....But I shouldn't be charged for them sending me the bill.

 

I like overpaying the bill by a small amount or even an estimate of the next bill, many organisations will send multiple letters saying do not overpay. Then I keep doing it, drives them nuts, in the old days I would get interest paid to me on my credit card at their going rate. (18% if I recall correctly) Best return ever from a bank. They have since fixed this, damn.

 
1 hour ago, Baghdad Bob said:

Doesn't worry me Nut.  I'd much rather have the convenience of booking and printing at home than having to line up in a queue and get it that way.

What the hell is a "Handling Charge" anyway?  It's a fee they charge to stay profitable and it's an amount they can charge for providing a service someone wants. Same with the Delivery fee really.  I suppose they have to pay for the hardware and software that provides it.  I hope they stay profitable, I like the convenience.

We all have a choice.  Always surprises me how people can get so worked up over such minor things.  Life is too short isn't it?

Handling charge was their booking fee in this instance.And yes... I love the convenience of printing at home too. Whilst I won't lose any sleep over it, I do think it is a giant rip to be charged $3.50 to send me tickets electronically ( note that they already send an invoice/confirmation by email free of charge).

 

anything that requires human labour/use of utilities/physical rented space/raw materials/hardware/equipment  obviously has a cost to produce. Just emailing us a ticket requires some of those things and it therefore has to be covered.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Gold Coast

    The Gold Coast Suns find themselves outside of the top eight for the first time since Round 1 with pressure is mounting on the entire organisation. Their coach Damien Hardwick expressed his frustration at his team’s condition last week by making a middle-finger gesture on television that earned him a fine for his troubles. He showed his desperation by claiming that Fox should pick up the tab.  There’s little doubt the Suns have shown improvement in 2025, and their position on the ladder is influenced to some extent by having played fewer games than their rivals for a playoff role at the end of the season, courtesy of the disruption caused by Cyclone Alfred in March.  However, they are following the same trajectory that hindered the club in past years whenever they appeared to be nearing their potential. As a consequence, that Hardwick gesture should be considered as more than a mere behavioral lapse. It’s a distress signal that does not bode well for the Queenslanders. While the Suns are eager to remain in contention with the top eight, Melbourne faces its own crisis, which is similarly deep-seated but in a much different way. After recovering from a disappointing start to the season and nearing a return to respectability among its peer clubs, the Demons have experienced a decline in status, driven by the fact that while their form has been reasonable (see their performance against the ladder leader in the Kings Birthday match), their conversion in front of goal is poor enough to rank last in the competition. Furthermore, their opponents find them exceptionally easy to score against. As a result, they have effectively eliminated themselves from the finals race and are again positioned to finish in the bottom half of the ladder.

    • 3 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 15

    As the Demons head into their Bye Round, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches being played. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons if we can manage to turn our season around? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

    • 276 replies
  • REPORT: Port Adelaide

    Of course, it’s not the backline, you might argue and you would probably be right. It’s the boot studder (do they still have them?), the midfield, the recruiting staff, the forward line, the kicking coach, the Board, the interchange bench, the supporters, the folk at Casey, the head coach and the club psychologist  It’s all of them and all of us for having expectations that were sufficiently high to have believed three weeks ago that a restoration of the Melbourne team to a position where we might still be in contention for a finals berth when the time for the midseason bye arrived. Now let’s look at what happened over the period of time since Melbourne overwhelmed the Sydney Swans at the MCG in late May when it kicked 8.2 to 5.3 in the final quarter (and that was after scoring 3.8 to two straight goals in the second term). 

    • 3 replies
  • CASEY: Essendon

    Casey’s unbeaten run was extended for at least another fortnight after the Demons overran a persistent Essendon line up by 29 points at ETU Stadium in Port Melbourne last night. After conceding the first goal of the evening, Casey went on a scoring spree from about ten minutes in, with five unanswered majors with its fleet of midsized runners headed by the much improved Paddy Cross who kicked two in quick succession and livewire Ricky Mentha who also kicked an early goal. Leading the charge was recruit of the year, Riley Bonner while Bailey Laurie continued his impressive vein of form. With Tom Campbell missing from the lineup, Will Verrall stepped up to the plate demonstrating his improvement under the veteran ruckman’s tutelage. The Demons were looking comfortable for much of the second quarter and held a 25-point lead until the Bombers struck back with two goals in the shadows of half time. On the other side of the main break their revival continued with first three goals of the half. Harry Sharp, who had been quiet scrambled in the Demons’ first score of the third term to bring the margin back to a single point at the 17 minute mark and the game became an arm-wrestle for the remainder of the quarter and into the final moments of the last.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Gold Coast

    The Demons have the Bye next week but then are on the road once again when they come up against the Gold Coast Suns on the Gold Coast in what could be a last ditch effort to salvage their season. Who comes in and who comes out?

      • Like
    • 262 replies
  • PODCAST: Port Adelaide

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 16th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Power.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 33 replies