Jump to content

Grimes and Lumumba - more opportunity?

Featured Replies

Posted

i always saw melksham as more a mid than a half-back flanker, but i know he's been earmarked as a half-back flanker.

 

with melksham having been earmarked for the half-back flank role, does this create a greater opportunity for either grimes or lumumba to cement their spot in that defensive 6?

 

grimes would be my preference as first cab off the rank for the role, as i'm not a huge fan of harry.

 
25 minutes ago, DemonAndrew said:

i always saw melksham as more a mid than a half-back flanker, but i know he's been earmarked as a half-back flanker.

I regard all Essendon Players as Half back Flankers!

Those two have got more than just Melksham to deal with.

H has an awful lot to do to redeem himself from last years performance.

Grimes I think has the potential to be in the team most weeks.

I think a more attacking gameplan will work wonders for many players.

 
1 hour ago, McQueen said:

Those two have got more than just Melksham to deal with.

H has an awful lot to do to redeem himself from last years performance.

Grimes I think has the potential to be in the team most weeks.

I think a more attacking gameplan will work wonders for many players.

I agree Steve they wont be looking sideways and backwards so much.

Grimes seemed to go backwards from the start of our defence at all costs and play to the boundaries coach remember him

Edited by old dee


Yeah my first thought was White might be able to take advantage of the opportunity. We're crying out for some skill and poise out of the backline. Alas, I reckon Grimes will be the likely chosen one.

LaBamba will be first cab off the rank ahead of White and Grimes.

Roos was all over him at last years trade period so will give him every opportunity to ensure the trade wasn't a bust.

 

Grimes was already in my best 22. Melksham on the fringe somewhere. Lumumba can spend the rest of his career at Casey for all I care. I would prefer to see White in the team before Lumumba gets another chance.

Grimes was dropped for the opening few rounds last year only coming in after injuries to others. He was dropped twice again during the year before succumbing to injury. Considering his disposal and decision making hasn't improved that much I think he's cooked. He's part of the reason we get bogged down in out backline. As we try to advance as a group we need flexibility, I would also try players like Stretch and ANB along with White off half back.

Essentially Grimes is the new Jordie, can't fault his application and the way he goes about it but his skills aren't up to it.  Playing off half back he needs to be damaging by foot and he's not, blame coaches for gameplan and culture but not his inability to kick the footy.  


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: North Melbourne

    Can you believe it? After a long period of years over which Melbourne has dominated in matches against North Melbourne, the Demons are looking down the barrel at two defeats at the hands of the Kangaroos in the same season. And if that eventuates, it will come hot on the heels of an identical result against the Gold Coast Suns. How have the might fallen? There is a slight difference in that North Melbourne are not yet in the same place as Gold Coast. Like Melbourne, they are currently situated in the lower half of the ladder and though they did achieve a significant upset when the teams met earlier in the season, their subsequent form has been equally unimpressive and inconsistent. 

    • 0 replies
  • REPORT: Adelaide

    The atmosphere at the Melbourne Football Club at the beginning of the season was aspirational following an injury-plagued year in 2024. Coach Simon Goodwin had lofty expectations with the return of key players, the anticipated improvement from a maturing group with a few years of experience under their belts, and some exceptional young talent also joining the ranks. All of that went by the wayside as the team failed to click into action early on. It rallied briefly with a new strategy but has fallen again with five more  consecutive defeats. 

    • 0 replies
  • CASEY: Coburg

    The Casey Demons returned to their home ground which was once a graveyard for opposing teams but they managed to gift the four points on offer to Coburg with yet another of their trademark displays of inaccuracy in front of goals and some undisciplined football that earned the displeasure of the umpires late in the game. The home team was welcomed by a small crowd at Casey Fields and looked right at home as it dominated the first three quarters and led for all bar the last five minutes of the game. In the end, they came away with nothing, despite winning everywhere but on the scoreboard and the free kick count.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Rd 18 vs North Melbourne

    After four weeks on the road the Demons make their long awaited return to the MCG next Sunday to play in a classic late season dead rubber against the North Melbourne Kangaroos. Who comes in and who comes out?

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 158 replies
  • POSTGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    The Demons were wasteful early before putting the foot down early in the 2nd quarter but they chased tail for the remainder of the match. They could not get their first use of the footy after half time and when they did poor skills, execution and decision making let them down.

      • Vomit
      • Sad
      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 246 replies
  • PODCAST: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 7th July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Crows.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 28 replies