Jump to content

My 3 word player analysis v Essendon

Featured Replies

Posted

N.Jones - kept on coming

Grimes - more attacking game

Salem - cool under crisis

Watts - mostly important involvements

Dawes - always made contests

Viney - can't question application

Frawley - consistently provided target

Tyson - involvement lifted team

McKenzie - outstanding tagger's game

Dunn - perfect backman's performance

Kent - the X factor

Cross - application and bravery

Garland - the quiet achiever

Pedersen - lifted second half

Vince - classy when required

McDonald - career best performance

Riley - couldn't find tempo

Howe - continued attacking defence

Jamar - gradually controlled centre

Bail - a quiet game

M.Jones - effective when tagging

Jetta - safe and tough

 

was this the first half, or second half.

We were shizenhousen the first half.

N.Jones - kept on coming

Grimes - more attacking game

Salem - cool under crisis

Watts - mostly important involvements

Dawes - always made contests

Viney - can't question application

Frawley - consistently provided target

Tyson - involvement lifted team

McKenzie - outstanding tagger's game

Dunn - perfect backman's performance

Kent - the X factor

Cross - application and bravery

Garland - the quiet achiever

Pedersen - lifted second half

Vince - classy when required

McDonald - career best performance

Riley - couldn't find tempo

Howe - continued attacking defence

Jamar - gradually controlled centre

Bail - a quiet game

M.Jones - effective when tagging

Jetta - safe and tough

Pretty accurate but can't agree with McDonald. He's played better games in the last few weeks and was made to look better by Dunn at times.

His disposal was again pretty shaky.

 

Watts - Can't protect space

Watts - Can't use body

Watts - Glad we won

Cross - Stick to percentage (kicks)

Kent - I sold him (at half time)

Kent - I regretted it (at full time)

Grimes - Had a go

Jamar - Shocking first half

Jamar - Redeemed himself after

Roos - Worth every penny

M.Jones - Ran bloody hard

Jetta - puts body last (finally)

Dunn - All Australian Backman? (Gaspar got one)

Overly generous IMO. First half was unacceptable, last quarter and a half was excellent. Nifty Nev and Dunn the best for me. Without them it could have benn ten goals at half time.


Watts - Can't protect space

Watts - Can't use body

Watts - Glad we won

Cross - Stick to percentage (kicks)

Kent - I sold him (at half time)

Kent - I regretted it (at full time)

How about "Watts was good", as were lots of others.

Grimes - Had a go

Jamar - Shocking first half

Jamar - Redeemed himself after

Roos - Worth every penny

M.Jones - Ran bloody hard

Jetta - puts body last (finally)

Dunn - All Australian Backman? (Gaspar got one)

Watts - Can't protect space

Watts - Can't use body

Watts - Glad we won

Cross - Stick to percentage (kicks)

Kent - I sold him (at half time)

Kent - I regretted it (at full time)

How about "Watts was good", as were lots of others.

Grimes - Had a go

Jamar - Shocking first half

Jamar - Redeemed himself after

Roos - Worth every penny

M.Jones - Ran bloody hard

Jetta - puts body last (finally)

Dunn - All Australian Backman? (Gaspar got one)

[/quote

How about "Watts was good". He made a mistake at the end but so did lots of our players, it was a great game for us, get off his back!

Kent - I sold him (at half time)

Kent - I regretted it (at full time)

His kick to Frawley in the second quarter was one of the highlights of the game.

Not many players on Melbourne's list can kick the way he does.

I rated his game from the start.

 

ame="Jack Jack Tappy" post="942783" timestamp="1402835867"][/quote

How about "Watts was good". He made a mistake at the end but so did lots of our players, it was a great game for us, get off his back!

I love Watts. I want him to succeed. But he does not know how to use his body to protect space; even when he is in a position of advantage.

I'm not a Watts knocker pal. In fact I'm 97 positive; 3 negative for Watts. I'm objective and have an opinion; and if you don't like it, it aint my problem.

ame="Jack Jack Tappy" post="942783" timestamp="1402835867"][/quote

How about "Watts was good". He made a mistake at the end but so did lots of our players, it was a great game for us, get off his back!

Agree he was pretty good today and is far to harshly judged by many.

We won just enjoy it.


I love Watts. I want him to succeed. But he does not know how to use his body to protect space; even when he is in a position of advantage.

I'm not a Watts knocker pal. In fact I'm 97 positive; 3 negative for Watts. I'm objective and have an opinion; and if you don't like it, it aint my problem.

I think he usually protects the space pretty well, it's just the ball isn't often kicked well to him.

He is a genuinely good kick and knows it, which is good to see him getting confident.

Only mistake was that he lost his feet, that said he competed well in most marking contests.

I think he usually protects the space pretty well, it's just the ball isn't often kicked well to him.

He is a genuinely good kick and knows it, which is good to see him getting confident.

Only mistake was that he lost his feet, that said he competed well in most marking contests.

When you look at the replay, look at 2 contests.

One where he went laterally towards the MCC members.

The other in the last with 3 minutes to go, down the Southern Stand toward Punt Road.

He's gotta learn to use his body to protect space. He allows the defender to get too close to the pill when he has not right to….IMO.

far too lenient on Garland

thought it was of his worst games for while

far too lenient on Garland

thought it was of his worst games for while

He was worse last week.

I tend to agree that Watts needs to learn to use his body better. On a couple of occasions I felt he could've either stuck his mitts out for the overhead grab instead of using one hand to bring it to ground (which he does a bit), or on another he was in a great position to work his man under the ball but couldn't.

Having said that, he is one of our most important players. He has a seriously valuable disposal and set shot, he is also working extremely hard at the moment picking up possessions all over the ground.

As he continues to mature he will learn to use his strength and his size, and will begin to find to ball more often (another 5/6 possessions on a consistent basis would seriously lift the team performance).


I tend to agree that Watts needs to learn to use his body better. On a couple of occasions I felt he could've either stuck his mitts out for the overhead grab instead of using one hand to bring it to ground (which he does a bit), or on another he was in a great position to work his man under the ball but couldn't.

Having said that, he is one of our most important players. He has a seriously valuable disposal and set shot, he is also working extremely hard at the moment picking up possessions all over the ground.

As he continues to mature he will learn to use his strength and his size, and will begin to find to ball more often (another 5/6 possessions on a consistent basis would seriously lift the team performance).

He plays like a basketballer. At times this can be advantageous - ie. that intercept goal at then end was classic basketball play. At times he will be criticised and he has some weaknesses as accurately pointed out here but overall he gives us a bit of class and x-factor. That is not a bad thing. He will probably get better at those things that frustrate but it's worth focusing on the positives. It's what a good coach (Roos) does, but what supporters, for the most part, are unable to do. An Essendon supporter nearby was doing the usual uneducated Watts bashing yesterday and we gave it to him while Watts (with perfect timing) nailed that shot in the 2nd quarter. The guy shut up.

this isn't related, but doesmnt deserve a thread title.

How long til smart replay has the melb game?

I think he usually protects the space pretty well, it's just the ball isn't often kicked well to him.

He is a genuinely good kick and knows it, which is good to see him getting confident.

Only mistake was that he lost his feet, that said he competed well in most marking contests.

Yes good to see him taking responsibility in asking for the ball after a mark by Cross just outside the 50 late in the second quarter and slotted it from 60 meters out. It was a critical goal and gave us some momentum going into the second half. I think he could take the game on like that much more than he has been. I think George Stone has been a tremendously positive influence on him in that regard. I still think over the next 5 years he will join the AFL elite and be a much more influential player than NicNac

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Port Adelaide

    With both sides precariously positioned ahead of the run home to the finals, only one team involved in Sunday’s clash at the Adelaide Oval between the Power and the Demons will remain a contender when it’s over.  On current form, that one team has to be Melbourne which narrowly missed out on defeating the competition’s power house Collingwood on King's Birthday and also recently overpowered both 2024 Grand Finalists. Conversely, Port Adelaide snapped out of a four-game losing streak with a win against the Giants in Canberra. Although they will be rejuvenated following that victory, their performances during that run of losses were sub par and resulted in some embarrassing blow out defeats.

    • 1 reply
  • NON-MFC: Round 14

    Round 14 is upon us and there's plenty at stake across the rest of the competition. As Melbourne heads to Adelaide, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches of the Round. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons’ finals tilt? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Like
    • 189 replies
  • REPORT: Collingwood

    The media focus on the fiery interaction between Max Gawn and Steven May at the end of the game was unfortunate because it took away the gloss from Melbourne’s performance in winning almost everywhere but on the scoreboard in its Kings Birthday clash with Collingwood at the MCG. It was a real battle reminiscent of the good old days when the rivalry between the two clubs was at its height and a fitting contest to celebrate the 2025 Australian of the Year, Neale Daniher and his superb work to bring the campaign to raise funds for motor neurone disease awareness to the forefront. Notwithstanding the fact that the Magpies snatched a one point victory from his old club, Daniher would be proud of the fact that his Demons fought tooth and nail to win the keenly contested game in front of 77,761 fans.

    • 1 reply
  • PREGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons are set to embark on a four-week road trip that takes them across the country, with two games in Adelaide and a clash on the Gold Coast, broken up by a mid-season bye. Next up is a meeting with the inconsistent Port Adelaide at Adelaide Oval. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 181 replies
  • PODCAST: Collingwood

    I have something on tomorrow night so Podcast will be Wednesday night. The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Wednesday, 11th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees heartbreaking 1 point loss to the Magpies on King's Birthday Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 37 replies
  • POSTGAME: Collingwood

    Despite effectively playing against four extra opponents, the Dees controlled much of the match. However, their inaccuracy in front of goal and inability to convert dominance in clearances and inside 50s ultimately cost them dearly, falling to a heartbreaking one-point loss on King’s Birthday.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 533 replies