Jump to content

David Rodan

dazzledavey36
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

your right django ben warren looks pretty good and is on my list of players to be picked up

cant believe hes not getting a game at nth, he will be cheap and pacy

seems like only yesterday we were sooking about no pace , bad coach, bad draft choices and a multitude of

things that were wrong at the club, now weve had a win, its all good vibes being posted for once

thank Christ for the 8 point saturday

  • Quote
    •  

    your right django ben warren looks pretty good and is on my list of players to be picked up

    cant believe hes not getting a game at nth, he will be cheap and pacy

    seems like only yesterday we were sooking about no pace , bad coach, bad draft choices and a multitude of

    things that were wrong at the club, now weve had a win, its all good vibes being posted for once

    thank Christ for the 8 point saturday

    Warren got delisted last year jazza, it was a bit of a surprise as they were so keen to sign him up in 2009 and he was still doing quite well in the VFL 2011/2012. Had a leg break in 2011 I think.

    So far this season he's had 41 goals from 12 matches so he should be looked at by at least a couple of clubs.

    Faint praise.

    He's been better than that. Given us grunt and the ability to break away from the middle for several weeks now.

    Those perennial baggers of the Gillies-Pederson-Byrnes recruitment threads should make a note to strike off Rodan now before they embarrass themselves further.

    If his form holds I'd give him one more year.

    I don't think he has been adequate in more than two games (Hawthorn and WBD) and next year once we have a developing player vying for his spot, he'll probably be a waste of a spot on the list anyway.

  • Quote

    Does anyone have a clip of his goal? It was the only minute I wasn't watching.

  • Quote
    •  

    Does anyone have a clip of his goal? It was the only minute I wasn't watching.

    Enjoy!

  • Quote

    Disagree. Grimes in for Dunn, Viney in for Blease or Byrnes if we had those 2 available before the dogs game. Even if they played mainly midfield our midfield numbers are so low one of Magner or Rodan would be getting a game.

    Ideally I think 9 is the bare minimum for midfielders in your starting 22 (with 4 forwards, 6 defenders, 1 sub and 2 rucks). So that makes Jones, Sylvia, Viney, Grimes, Toumpas, M. Jones, Evans, Tagger (Mckenzie or Nicho) and one of Rodan/Magner only makes 9.

    No doubt with everyone available there would be genuine debate over the final spots of selection between a Rodan or Matt Jones or Evans or Toumpas or a forward like Blease or Kent but I think ideally you'd have what Geelong do which is players like Stokes and Christensen who are really midfielders but capable of dual roles. If in doubt I'd go with the extra mids as you noticed we ran out of midfield power in the last 15 minutes against the dogs.

    Grimes won't come in for Dunn (as much as I'd enjoy that). Dunn's being used in defence and Grimes has been used this year in the middle.

    I think Grimes and Viney will be pushing directly at Rodan's spot, as well as Byrnes, Nicholson and Blease (our more fringe midfielders).

  • Quote

    Does anyone have a clip of his goal? It was the only minute I wasn't watching.

    He did a good job Saturday - looked a lot "freer of spirit" than when I saw him last - Neeld vs Craig factor?

    And, an inspirational goal.

  • Quote

    Enjoy!

    Thanks so much. I did enjoy that!

  • Quote

    Good game but call me if he repeats against a good team at some point

  • Quote
    •  

    Good game but call me if he repeats against a good team at some point

    Did ok against Hawthorn.

    Byrnes and Rodan, and by extension Neeld, have been catapulted into the Realm of Reasons our List Is Terrible and it isn't fair at all.

    The draft, trades and FA allows a certain amount of potential or actual A or B grade players to come onto your list.

    Nat Draft top 50 picks, PSD top 3 picks, about 4 or 5 FAs, and a few trades can get those players.

    Once you get past that point you are looking at what you can do make your list better for that next year.

    We went older with the selections after that: Terlich, Matt Jones, Dawes, Rodan, Byrnes, Pedersen, Clisby and Gillies were targetted for that reason with the outlay being:

    ND Picks 20, 45, 70, 88, RD Pick 19, Martin and Gysberts.

    IMO:

    Dawes is worth the outlay of 20 and 45.

    Jones was worth Martin.

    Terlich was worth Pick 70.

    Rodan and Byrnes were worth the spot on the list ahead of whatever speculative player that was out there.

    Clisby was worth RD Pick 19.

    I don't know whether Pedersen was worth Gysberts - frankly neither look like making much of an impact on the AFL.

    Gillies was not worth the outlay of an early PSD pick (which is what we gave up when we signed him as a DFA).

    Our list is thin for mids because of decisions made in the past.

  • Quote

    Did ok against Hawthorn.

    Byrnes and Rodan, and by extension Neeld, have been catapulted into the Realm of Reasons our List Is Terrible and it isn't fair at all.

    The draft, trades and FA allows a certain amount of potential or actual A or B grade players to come onto your list.

    Nat Draft top 50 picks, PSD top 3 picks, about 4 or 5 FAs, and a few trades can get those players.

    Once you get past that point you are looking at what you can do make your list better for that next year.

    We went older with the selections after that: Terlich, Matt Jones, Dawes, Rodan, Byrnes, Pedersen, Clisby and Gillies were targetted for that reason with the outlay being:

    ND Picks 20, 45, 70, 88, RD Pick 19, Martin and Gysberts.

    IMO:

    Dawes is worth the outlay of 20 and 45.

    Jones was worth Martin.

    Terlich was worth Pick 70.

    Rodan and Byrnes were worth the spot on the list ahead of whatever speculative player that was out there.

    Clisby was worth RD Pick 19.

    I don't know whether Pedersen was worth Gysberts - frankly neither look like making much of an impact on the AFL.

    Gillies was not worth the outlay of an early PSD pick (which is what we gave up when we signed him as a DFA).

    Our list is thin for mids because of decisions made in the past.

    agree totally

  • Quote

    Enjoy!

    Loved that Rodan goal! (I am presently in New York and haven't seen any footy for five weeks)!

  • Quote

    • Archived

    This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • CASEY: Sydney

      The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • REPORT: St. Kilda

      Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
      This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

        • Haha
      • 4 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Collingwood

      After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Clap
        • Like
      • 198 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: St. Kilda

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

        • Sad
      • 47 replies
      Demonland

    • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

      After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

        • Clap
        • Like
      • 330 replies
      Demonland

    • VOTES: St. Kilda

      Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

        • Like
      • 31 replies
      Demonland
    View All