Jump to content

The Myles Sewell Thread

Featured Replies

Posted

http://www.theroosters.com.au/component/option,com_club/id,50/view,member/

Would love to pick up this guy, and in a weak draft am hoping we pick him up with pick 52, reckon we should be able to get him there.

We need some midfield depth and players with some grunt and Myles brings this in spades. Can also play a run with role. Anyone else think he's worth a punt and if we'll go for him? Either in the national draft or rookie draft?

 

not for me, we already have enough of his type, slightly built, not great skills

 

not for me, we already have enough of his type, slightly built, not great skills

Just for my benefit [censored], what has made you have this opinion? I'm not being a smart ass, but do you watch a lot of the Roosters games in person? I can't see how a bloke that wins club and league B7F's, gets BOG in a grand final (I think!), has made the past 3 or so VFL Team of the Year, can have not great skills. Surely there must be something there for him to continually perform?

I'm all for Sewell. As a full time footballer, I'd expect him to add 3-5kg of muscle, bringing him up to 83-85kg.

I agree with the thoughts that we, like other clubs, have had many opportunities to draft him in the past, and the fact his brother plays at Hawthorn and they haven't picked him up probably isn't a great reference, but wasn't Michael Barlow in the same boat (without the brother playing at Hawthorn)?

I'd be keen to snap him up with our 3rd pick. We have a good history with kids picked in the 50's. In a weak draft, the risk is very minimal, and it might be a great way to target his brother at the end of 2012.

He's been the featured roughie in about the last three drafts now, clearly every club has had a good look at him over this time and passed for whatever reason. What would make a club change their opinion on him now?

Pass.


He's been the featured roughie in about the last three drafts now, clearly every club has had a good look at him over this time and passed for whatever reason. What would make a club change their opinion on him now?

Pass.

It's the same question that Geelong asked when they picked up Pods, and Freo asked when they picked up Barlow. Now they are sitting back laughing at all the idiots that let them go!

I, and the OP, aren't talking about using a first rounder on him, but surely at a 3rd or 4th round pick, there'd have to be worse out there?

Just for my benefit [censored], what has made you have this opinion? I'm not being a smart ass, but do you watch a lot of the Roosters games in person? I can't see how a bloke that wins club and league B7F's, gets BOG in a grand final (I think!), has made the past 3 or so VFL Team of the Year, can have not great skills. Surely there must be something there for him to continually perform?

I'm all for Sewell. As a full time footballer, I'd expect him to add 3-5kg of muscle, bringing him up to 83-85kg.

I agree with the thoughts that we, like other clubs, have had many opportunities to draft him in the past, and the fact his brother plays at Hawthorn and they haven't picked him up probably isn't a great reference, but wasn't Michael Barlow in the same boat (without the brother playing at Hawthorn)?

I'd be keen to snap him up with our 3rd pick. We have a good history with kids picked in the 50's. In a weak draft, the risk is very minimal, and it might be a great way to target his brother at the end of 2012.

You were similarly upset when i said he might be slow, have average skills and lack upside....he gets the ball though thats for sure, works hard ect but lacks the real polish imo

I have heard from a number of people who have worked closely with Myles since he played juniors that these are reasons why he has never been drafted, and what will continue to stop him. in a weak draft this may give him an opportunity but every club has had 3-4 years to do so, why now?

What do you think Myles can add to and AFL list?

It's the same question that Geelong asked when they picked up Pods, and Freo asked when they picked up Barlow. Now they are sitting back laughing at all the idiots that let them go!

I, and the OP, aren't talking about using a first rounder on him, but surely at a 3rd or 4th round pick, there'd have to be worse out there?

And for every success with getting VFL players there is just as many failures. Pods was not talked up before three drafts, he excelled at kicking goals in the VFL in Sauntners shadow, and then joined Geelong as a fitness coach and got a leg in that way, A team travelling as well as Geelong were at the time can afford to take a risk drafting a mature age smokey.

Barlow only had one outstanding year in the VFL that caught scouts eyes, before then he was a good solid up and coming VFL player, he was then snapped up straight away. Sewells best year of footy was two years ago now.

 

Definitely worth a go, and I'm stumped as to why we haven't made a play for him in the last couple of seasons. Proven player at VFL level and deserves a go higher.

There's a case for loading our Rookie list with Valenti, Sewell and any other 'top-line VFL' players we can get, especially inside mids. Get the ball into the developing forwards at Casey, give the developing ruckmen something fun to work with, and give some breathing space to the developing backmen.

Meanwhile, in an injury pinch, whichever of them shows strongest form can step up and at least provide a competent and enthusiastic mature body in the middle. We don't have a lot of depth in that respect.

And the Casey people would love us, which is nice.


Just for my benefit [censored], what has made you have this opinion? I'm not being a smart ass, but do you watch a lot of the Roosters games in person? I can't see how a bloke that wins club and league B7F's, gets BOG in a grand final (I think!), has made the past 3 or so VFL Team of the Year, can have not great skills. Surely there must be something there for him to continually perform?

I'm all for Sewell. As a full time footballer, I'd expect him to add 3-5kg of muscle, bringing him up to 83-85kg.

I agree with the thoughts that we, like other clubs, have had many opportunities to draft him in the past, and the fact his brother plays at Hawthorn and they haven't picked him up probably isn't a great reference, but wasn't Michael Barlow in the same boat (without the brother playing at Hawthorn)?

I'd be keen to snap him up with our 3rd pick. We have a good history with kids picked in the 50's. In a weak draft, the risk is very minimal, and it might be a great way to target his brother at the end of 2012.

one of my major concerns with drafting Sewell is we have enough of his type. What we need is skillful, pacey outside midfielders, not ball winning grunt mids.

Its more about team needs and balance, than anything else

worth a punt with a late pick for sure....has been rated for about 4 years now....we picked up Robbie Campbell last year as a punt and nobody minded that he didn't play...so let's give Miles a crack with a late pick.

Agree, worst case scenario is he we get him to Casey.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: St. Kilda

    It seems like only yesterday that these two sides faced off against each other in the centre of the continent. It was when Melbourne was experiencing a rare period of success with five wins from its previous six matches including victories over both of last year’s grand finalists.  Well, it wasn’t yesterday but it was early last month and it remains etched clearly in the memory. The Saints were going through a slump and the predicted outcome of their encounter at TIO Traeger Park was a virtual no-brainer. A Melbourne victory and another step closer to a possible rise into finals contention. Something that was unthinkable after opening the season with five straight defeats.

    • 5 replies
  • REPORT: Carlton

    I am now certain that the decline in fortunes of the Melbourne Football Club from a premiership power with the potential for more success to come in the future, started when the team ran out for their Round 9 match up against Carlton last year. After knocking over the Cats in a fierce contest the week before, the Demons looked uninterested at the start of play and gave the Blues a six goal start. They recovered to almost snatch victory but lost narrowly with a score of 11.10.76 to 12.5.77. Yesterday, they revisited the scene and provided their fans with a similar display of ineptitude early in the proceedings. Their attitude at the start was poor, given that the game was so winnable. Unsurprisingly, the resulting score was almost identical to that of last year and for the fourth time in succession, the club has lost a game against Carlton despite having more scoring opportunities. 

    • 3 replies
  • CASEY: Carlton

    The Casey Demons smashed the Carlton Reserves off the park at Casey Fields on Sunday to retain a hold on an end of season wild card place. It was a comprehensive 108 point victory in which the home side was dominant and several of its players stood out but, in spite of the positivity of such a display, we need to place an asterisk over the outcome which saw a net 100 point advantage to the combined scores in the two contests between Demons and Blues over the weekend.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: St. Kilda

    The Demons come face to face with St. Kilda for the second time this season for their return clash at Marvel Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 310 replies
  • PODCAST: Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 22nd July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to Carlton at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 40 replies
  • VOTES: Carlton

    Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Kozzy Pickett & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

    • 23 replies