Jump to content

Brett Lovett sacked as Sandringham Coach...

Featured Replies

Posted

Well it seems that Brett Lovett the former Melbourne Demons player has been sacked as Coach of the Sandringham Zebras in the VFL.

Here is a link to the article about it: http://www.theage.co...1009-1lft3.html

Perhaps he would be a good replacement for Garry Lyon as "Director of Football" .....?? However, I suppose it is up to Mark Neeld and the MFC board.

I would prefer for Garry Lyon to stay at the MFC in some capacity though.

Anyways, I would like to hear people's opinions on whether or not we should consider offering Brett Lovett a job back at the Demons?

Edited by Supreme_Demon

 

He could be considered to take over from Gary but I think the decision is a board one.

Neeld would have little say about who is being appointed to the board in fact I would be surprised if he had any.

I think Gary is sounding people out I thought I heard Gary might be putting the hard word on Gerard Healy.

We wait and see this is an important position which will take time and consideration.

Edited by Diablo Deemon

I think Gary is sounding people out I thought I heard Gary might be putting the hard word on Gerard Healy.

.

what the same Demon critical, original mercinary Gerard Healy?!

 

I think Gary is sounding people out I thought I heard Gary might be putting the hard word on Gerard Healy.

Diablo, someone is taking the pizz if they suggested one Gerard Healy :wacko: Sure it wasn't his brother?

Anyway, in the past the position was filled by a board member, so first you would have to get elected when a vacancy was available

Diablo, someone is taking the pizz if they suggested one Gerard Healy :wacko: Sure it wasn't his brother?

Anyway, in the past the position was filled by a board member, so first you would have to get elected when a vacancy was available

DC I don't think Andrew L's position was ever filled.

Maybe wrong but that is my memory of things from this years AGM.


DC I don't think Andrew L's position was ever filled.

Maybe wrong but that is my memory of things from this years AGM.

I think you might be right but would it still require a vote or could the board just appoint a replacement to AL without members voting

Anyway whoever gets the job also has to be prepared to take on board member responsibilities which is another issue

wow diddent see that coming

I think you might be right but would it still require a vote or could the board just appoint a replacement to AL without members voting

Anyway whoever gets the job also has to be prepared to take on board member responsibilities which is another issue

My understanding is they could appoint someone now and if there was no challenger at the next AGM the person is elected unopposed for a term.

 

Not sure if he was "dumped" or not. In the paper on Sunday it said the Aints wanted a FT coach and Brett was only prepared to stay PT. Maybe that's the nice way of saying you're not wanted?

Diablo, someone is taking the pizz if they suggested one Gerard Healy :wacko: Sure it wasn't his brother?

Anyway, in the past the position was filled by a board member, so first you would have to get elected when a vacancy was available

Might have been I vaguely recall Lyon mentioning On triple m he was looking for others to take over and mentioning Healy's name.

Edited by Diablo Deemon


It was Greg Healy not Gerard Healy.

I dont know what the MFC constitution specifically says but it is usual practice for any director appointed by the Board retire for re appointment at the next available AGM.

Unless Brett Lovett has anything special to provide MFC I am not sure I would be appointing him to any role in deference to the best available candidate. If its indeed him then appoint him. Otherwise we are becoming an Old Boys club. Prefer appointments on merit going forward not just because you played at MFC.

It was Greg Healy not Gerard Healy.

I dont know what the MFC constitution specifically says but it is usual practice for any director appointed by the Board retire for re appointment at the next available AGM.

Unless Brett Lovett has anything special to provide MFC I am not sure I would be appointing him to any role in deference to the best available candidate. If its indeed him then appoint him. Otherwise we are becoming an Old Boys club. Prefer appointments on merit going forward not just because you played at MFC.

The Football Director requires an 'old boy.'

Nepotism is sometimes required.

Board member. Ear to all at the club. Footy IQ required. Loyalty definitely needed.

An 'old boy' is what is required.

The Whole Old Boys Club thing is the biggest Myth in Football. So many clubshave so called "Old Boys" running the place with Key people who have played for the club intricate to the way its run and coached.

Carlton - kernahan / Ratten / Williams / Bradley all heavily involved in club workings for example. They atre their because they know the club and are good at what they do.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: St. Kilda

    It seems like only yesterday that these two sides faced off against each other in the centre of the continent. It was when Melbourne was experiencing a rare period of success with five wins from its previous six matches including victories over both of last year’s grand finalists.  Well, it wasn’t yesterday but it was early last month and it remains etched clearly in the memory. The Saints were going through a slump and the predicted outcome of their encounter at TIO Traeger Park was a virtual no-brainer. A Melbourne victory and another step closer to a possible rise into finals contention. Something that was unthinkable after opening the season with five straight defeats.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 5 replies
  • REPORT: Carlton

    I am now certain that the decline in fortunes of the Melbourne Football Club from a premiership power with the potential for more success to come in the future, started when the team ran out for their Round 9 match up against Carlton last year. After knocking over the Cats in a fierce contest the week before, the Demons looked uninterested at the start of play and gave the Blues a six goal start. They recovered to almost snatch victory but lost narrowly with a score of 11.10.76 to 12.5.77. Yesterday, they revisited the scene and provided their fans with a similar display of ineptitude early in the proceedings. Their attitude at the start was poor, given that the game was so winnable. Unsurprisingly, the resulting score was almost identical to that of last year and for the fourth time in succession, the club has lost a game against Carlton despite having more scoring opportunities. 

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 3 replies
  • CASEY: Carlton

    The Casey Demons smashed the Carlton Reserves off the park at Casey Fields on Sunday to retain a hold on an end of season wild card place. It was a comprehensive 108 point victory in which the home side was dominant and several of its players stood out but, in spite of the positivity of such a display, we need to place an asterisk over the outcome which saw a net 100 point advantage to the combined scores in the two contests between Demons and Blues over the weekend.

      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: St. Kilda

    The Demons come face to face with St. Kilda for the second time this season for their return clash at Marvel Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 310 replies
  • PODCAST: Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 22nd July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to Carlton at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 40 replies
  • VOTES: Carlton

    Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Kozzy Pickett & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 23 replies