Jump to content

Featured Replies

sheesh guys, that's the last time i share an amusing little pic with you neanderthals

go and beat up stuie or moonie

i'm going out to kick an alpaca

The backside in question wasn't all that little ... :lol: At the risk of sounding like BBO, I didn't know there are alpacas in Burwood :)

 

Is that your proposal for new flag for NZ, DF? :blink:

Better then that.

The MFC new Flag.

The backside in question wasn't all that little ... :lol: At the risk of sounding like BBO, I didn't know there are alpacas in Burwood :)

of course there isn't, the foxes wouldn't allow it

that's why i said "i'm going out to kick an alpaca"

 
  • Author

At last a cultured soul among the barbarians. Tombay was something of a Tonto though generally useless.

He made Shintaro look good to the ladies.

PS. I have often tried to jump backwards up into a tree, but haven't perfected the art as yet. I am still working on it.

Edited by Redleg


He made Shintaro look good to the ladies.

PS. I have often tried to jump backwards up into a tree, but haven't perfected the art as yet. I am still working on it.

Well the ninjas could do it, so it must be possible. Keep practising RL.

  • Author

Well the ninjas could do it, so it must be possible. Keep practising RL.

Ow! Just missed again.

  • Author

I posted this on another thread but thought you might like to read it.

"I don't want to get bogged down with PP talk the same as many others but let me just say this:

It is a rule of the AFL that consistently poorly performing clubs can be given draft assistance. That rule doesn't disqualify a club because of previous drafting failures, obviously.

It was an AFL rule that we would have got a PP due to our results, which the AFL dropped to our detriment.

It was an AFL rule that created 2 new clubs and gave them all of the top end of the draft, at a time when we were crap and were trying to recover.

It was an AFL rule that allowed our number 1 pick to run off to GWS in the first 2 years of his drafting by us and funded by AFL money.

It is an AFL rule that has brought in FA, which is not doing what it was intended to do, but has seen us lose Sylvia, Moloney, Rivers and probably Frawley, more than any other club and at a time when we are on the bottom of the ladder.

It is also an AFL rule that allows the AFL to have a fixture not based on fairness, but revenue, which has compromised our financial position for years.

We follow the bloody rules, let the bloody AFL do the same."

 

I think the smoking gun might be when he testifies that he went in to the bathroom to get his tinea cream.

That could be the Achilles heel for the defence.

the defence have big problems biffo

like how do you de-feet an amputee?

i'm looking forward to the nextv oscar winning movie from frank darabont and stephen king - "The Sawn-Shank Redemption"

I posted this on another thread but thought you might like to read it.

"I don't want to get bogged down with PP talk the same as many others but let me just say this:

It is a rule of the AFL that consistently poorly performing clubs can be given draft assistance. That rule doesn't disqualify a club because of previous drafting failures, obviously.

It was an AFL rule that we would have got a PP due to our results, which the AFL dropped to our detriment.

It was an AFL rule that created 2 new clubs and gave them all of the top end of the draft, at a time when we were crap and were trying to recover.

It was an AFL rule that allowed our number 1 pick to run off to GWS in the first 2 years of his drafting by us and funded by AFL money.

It is an AFL rule that has brought in FA, which is not doing what it was intended to do, but has seen us lose Sylvia, Moloney, Rivers and probably Frawley, more than any other club and at a time when we are on the bottom of the ladder.

It is also an AFL rule that allows the AFL to have a fixture not based on fairness, but revenue, which has compromised our financial position for years.

We follow the bloody rules, let the bloody AFL do the same."

I am with you Conrad.


of course there isn't, the foxes wouldn't allow it

that's why i said "i'm going out to kick an alpaca"

Out to Romsey? Or a nearby alpaca-kicking centre? Or are there foxes in Romsey too? :blink:

He made Shintaro look good to the ladies.

PS. I have often tried to jump backwards up into a tree, but haven't perfected the art as yet. I am still working on it.

first catch a big tiger snake.

then put it at base of tree.

  • Author

first catch a big tiger snake.

then put it at base of tree.

Yowsah!

Out to Romsey? Or a nearby alpaca-kicking centre? Or are there foxes in Romsey too? :blink:

nearest alpaca-kicking-centre is wantirna

foxes in romsey? yes, but they have a very low life expectancy

  • Author

nearest alpaca-kicking-centre is wantirna

foxes in romsey? yes, but they have a very low life expectancy

Favourite of the locals is Fox Ragu.

Edited by Redleg


Favourite of the locals is Fox Ragu.

don't think they have any culinary skills redleg. probably just eat it raw

they do like the tails on their 4wd aerials though

Edited by daisycutter

  • Author

don't think they have any culinary skills redleg. probably just eat it raw

they do like the tails on their 4wd aerials though

Not to mention on the coonskin hats.

first catch a big tiger snake.

then put it at base of tree.

I have a great looking Tiger Snake living somewhere in my back yard if that helps.

Out to Romsey? Or a nearby alpaca-kicking centre? Or are there foxes in Romsey too? :blink:

You know what this type of talk does to the Professor?

But if you must say it just use a few banana related terms to confuse him.

the defence have big problems biffo

like how do you de-feet an amputee?

i'm looking forward to the nextv oscar winning movie from frank darabont and stephen king - "The Sawn-Shank Redemption"

Followed by the sequel,

"I can't Jump puddles"


Followed by the sequel,

"I can't Jump puddles"

and "Silence of the Limbs"

the prosecution is looking a bit weak

they claim oscar shot reema with a 9mm pistol

that's one seriously small pistol :o

and "Silence of the Limbs"

the prosecution is looking a bit weak

they claim oscar shot reema with a 9mm pistol

that's one seriously small pistol :o

Now you're really plumbing the bottom of the Reeva.

It would take an olympic feet for you to wring more laughs out of this one.

Now you're really plumbing the bottom of the Reeva.

It would take an olympic feet for you to wring more laughs out of this one.

oscar may not have worn the pants but he called the shots

you sound a little pistorius biffo

 

News Flash:

Ita expected to cross the coast Friday afternoon.

Suggest we all buy bananas tomorrow morning, price could triple by Monday.

oscar may not have worn the pants but he called the shots

you sound a little pistorius biffo

That's ridiculous ,there is no way he would have had itchy feet after a short relationship with a woman of her beauty.

Maybe their biggest issue was that he fired off a shot too quickly in the bedroom?

Edited by Biffen


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 42 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 286 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies