Jump to content

Featured Replies

19 hours ago, Neil Crompton said:

Either deranged and in need of a white jacket, or smarter than we give her credit for and has fooled us all.

I’m going with seriously deranged.

Me too. 

 
  • Author
21 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

IF ONLY Uncle Bitters was playing “hard to get.” At this point I’d settle for him playing “not so pathetically easy to get.”

Thank you for not imposing a ban. Highly magnanimous of you. 
Geez what does a gal hafta do to get a ban around here??? 🙄

I think we have to show some compassion for Uncle Bitters.

He has lost his two pet dogs.

His moat has dried up.

His butler quit and his maid is getting uppity.

His favourite wine cask is out of stock at the general store.

The Dees have not won a game for months.

That is a lot to deal with and I think he needs some kind words from all of us.

  • Author

What the hell is going on with my posts on this thread?

Occasionally when I post it says I need approval.

Edited by Redleg

 

Far out… people need to get out more. Offended by comments about a fictitious-person.

Edited by Ethan Tremblay
Edited out that horrible “m” word


3 hours ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

IF ONLY Uncle Bitters was playing “hard to get.” At this point I’d settle for him playing “not so pathetically easy to get.”

Thank you for not imposing a ban. Highly magnanimous of you. 
Geez what does a gal hafta do to get a ban around here??? 🙄

I had "What's a girl gotta do...?" typed in after Mr Leg's 12:48 PM yesterday but deleted it. Appropriation is so non-PC these days.

But, 'Great minds...' n all that!

On 12/29/2022 at 10:57 AM, WalkingCivilWar said:

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY 

 

THOMAS

BLOODY

SCULLY

Whoops. Seems I’ve breached the No T$ rule by accidentally mentioning Tom Scully. Whoops, did it again.

I apologise sincerely, Redleg.

Mete out my punishment and I shall accept it without ado.

I understand a ban from this thread is the standard form of punishment. The longer the better. So be it. 

This is the one from West Adelaide, isn’t it?

In which case no rules have been broken.

 

 
4 hours ago, Whispering_Jack said:

This is the one from West Adelaide, isn’t it?

In which case no rules have been broken.

 

Might be the NZ pro cyclist with EF?

On 3/22/2014 at 8:38 PM, Redleg said:

So I am depressed could not even turn to Redtube or World Movies or SBS late night movies.

Just looking back at old posts here to find how things have changed.

Would have loved to have had the chance to tell the poster that we will win the flag in 2021.. and more to follow. Just saying.....

Edited by David-Demon


  • Author
5 hours ago, David-Demon said:

Just looking back at old posts here to find how things have changed.

Would have loved to have had the chance to tell the poster that we will win the flag in 2021.. and more to follow. Just saying.....

Well you could post that we are going to win the 2023 flag. That might be nice.

15 hours ago, Whispering_Jack said:

This is the one from West Adelaide, isn’t it?

In which case no rules have been broken.

 

How do you know?

  • Author
5 hours ago, old dee said:

How do you know?

Yes OD, a rather interesting conundrum.

23 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Yes OD, a rather interesting conundrum.

the only solution to such technical loop-holes would be just to add the surname [censored] to the banned names list

i'm sure your contacts in the demonland hierarchy could do us that small favour

52 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

the only solution to such technical loop-holes would be just to add the surname [censored] to the banned names list

i'm sure your contacts in the demonland hierarchy could do us that small favour

Not confident of that DC. There have been times when he wanted to close us down. 


  • Author
1 hour ago, daisycutter said:

the only solution to such technical loop-holes would be just to add the surname [censored] to the banned names list

i'm sure your contacts in the demonland hierarchy could do us that small favour

A great idea DC.

I can see that you are more than just a good looking human being.

Notice how I satisfied the woke minority with my description of you.

  • Author

WJ can you please arrange to ban the surname of the unmentionable on this thread, or DL in general.

11 minutes ago, Redleg said:

A great idea DC.

I can see that you are more than just a good looking human being.

Notice how I satisfied the woke minority with my description of you.

thanks, red. i have no problems being called a rooster or a [censored]

in fact when i was a kid it was common to call male friends  [censored]  (interchangeable with mate, cobber or digger for some)

wow even c.0.c.k (note the zero) got censored 

Edited by daisycutter

  • Author

Well it’s a new year and I think we have to fix up a major problem on here.

WCW and Uncle Bitters is just too volatile a romantic relationship to continue. It is just too distressing for the posters on here, being dragged into your various issues.

As self appointed Chairman ( Dictator), of the thread, I am decreeing that from now on, the two of you will be platonic best friends only and that should solve the problem.

It’s up to you two now, so enjoy your new best friend.

For the rest of you, I wish you all a happy, healthy and safe New Year and of course another Dees flag, the first of a trifecta of flags for us in the next 3 years.

Bah to you all - particularly lawyers !

As to WCW - good lord ! A demented termagant if ever I've seen one !

I wish myself a prosperous and ever more decadent 2023!


  • Author
10 minutes ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

Bah to you all - particularly lawyers !

As to WCW - good lord ! A demented termagant if ever I've seen one !

I wish myself a prosperous and ever more decadent 2023!

I always new this thread would be very educational.

Now I have learned the meaning of " termagant ".

5 minutes ago, Redleg said:

I always new this thread would be very educational.

Now I have learned the meaning of " termagant ".

Pleased to have enlightened you Red.

Surely you must agree my usage of that word  was elegant, accurate and appropriate to the context.

19 hours ago, Redleg said:

WJ can you please arrange to ban the surname of the unmentionable on this thread, or DL in general.

One last look then:

image.png.bf3511df253c459b7215936575a4eded.png

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: St. Kilda

    It's Game Day and there are only 5 games to go. Can the Demons find some consistency and form as they stagger towards the finish line of another uninspiring season?

      • Like
    • 566 replies
  • PREVIEW: St. Kilda

    It seems like only yesterday that these two sides faced off against each other in the centre of the continent. It was when Melbourne was experiencing a rare period of success with five wins from its previous six matches including victories over both of last year’s grand finalists.  Well, it wasn’t yesterday but it was early last month and it remains etched clearly in the memory. The Saints were going through a slump and the predicted outcome of their encounter at TIO Traeger Park was a virtual no-brainer. A Melbourne victory and another step closer to a possible rise into finals contention. Something that was unthinkable after opening the season with five straight defeats.

    • 5 replies
  • REPORT: Carlton

    I am now certain that the decline in fortunes of the Melbourne Football Club from a premiership power with the potential for more success to come in the future, started when the team ran out for their Round 9 match up against Carlton last year. After knocking over the Cats in a fierce contest the week before, the Demons looked uninterested at the start of play and gave the Blues a six goal start. They recovered to almost snatch victory but lost narrowly with a score of 11.10.76 to 12.5.77. Yesterday, they revisited the scene and provided their fans with a similar display of ineptitude early in the proceedings. Their attitude at the start was poor, given that the game was so winnable. Unsurprisingly, the resulting score was almost identical to that of last year and for the fourth time in succession, the club has lost a game against Carlton despite having more scoring opportunities. 

    • 3 replies
  • CASEY: Carlton

    The Casey Demons smashed the Carlton Reserves off the park at Casey Fields on Sunday to retain a hold on an end of season wild card place. It was a comprehensive 108 point victory in which the home side was dominant and several of its players stood out but, in spite of the positivity of such a display, we need to place an asterisk over the outcome which saw a net 100 point advantage to the combined scores in the two contests between Demons and Blues over the weekend.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: St. Kilda

    The Demons come face to face with St. Kilda for the second time this season for their return clash at Marvel Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 310 replies
  • PODCAST: Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 22nd July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to Carlton at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 40 replies