Jump to content

Featured Replies

19 hours ago, Neil Crompton said:

Either deranged and in need of a white jacket, or smarter than we give her credit for and has fooled us all.

I’m going with seriously deranged.

Me too. 

 
  • Author
21 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

IF ONLY Uncle Bitters was playing “hard to get.” At this point I’d settle for him playing “not so pathetically easy to get.”

Thank you for not imposing a ban. Highly magnanimous of you. 
Geez what does a gal hafta do to get a ban around here??? 🙄

I think we have to show some compassion for Uncle Bitters.

He has lost his two pet dogs.

His moat has dried up.

His butler quit and his maid is getting uppity.

His favourite wine cask is out of stock at the general store.

The Dees have not won a game for months.

That is a lot to deal with and I think he needs some kind words from all of us.

  • Author

What the hell is going on with my posts on this thread?

Occasionally when I post it says I need approval.

Edited by Redleg

 

Far out… people need to get out more. Offended by comments about a fictitious-person.

Edited by Ethan Tremblay
Edited out that horrible “m” word


3 hours ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

IF ONLY Uncle Bitters was playing “hard to get.” At this point I’d settle for him playing “not so pathetically easy to get.”

Thank you for not imposing a ban. Highly magnanimous of you. 
Geez what does a gal hafta do to get a ban around here??? 🙄

I had "What's a girl gotta do...?" typed in after Mr Leg's 12:48 PM yesterday but deleted it. Appropriation is so non-PC these days.

But, 'Great minds...' n all that!

On 12/29/2022 at 10:57 AM, WalkingCivilWar said:

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY

TOM SCULLY 

 

THOMAS

BLOODY

SCULLY

Whoops. Seems I’ve breached the No T$ rule by accidentally mentioning Tom Scully. Whoops, did it again.

I apologise sincerely, Redleg.

Mete out my punishment and I shall accept it without ado.

I understand a ban from this thread is the standard form of punishment. The longer the better. So be it. 

This is the one from West Adelaide, isn’t it?

In which case no rules have been broken.

 

 
4 hours ago, Whispering_Jack said:

This is the one from West Adelaide, isn’t it?

In which case no rules have been broken.

 

Might be the NZ pro cyclist with EF?

On 3/22/2014 at 8:38 PM, Redleg said:

So I am depressed could not even turn to Redtube or World Movies or SBS late night movies.

Just looking back at old posts here to find how things have changed.

Would have loved to have had the chance to tell the poster that we will win the flag in 2021.. and more to follow. Just saying.....

Edited by David-Demon


  • Author
5 hours ago, David-Demon said:

Just looking back at old posts here to find how things have changed.

Would have loved to have had the chance to tell the poster that we will win the flag in 2021.. and more to follow. Just saying.....

Well you could post that we are going to win the 2023 flag. That might be nice.

15 hours ago, Whispering_Jack said:

This is the one from West Adelaide, isn’t it?

In which case no rules have been broken.

 

How do you know?

  • Author
5 hours ago, old dee said:

How do you know?

Yes OD, a rather interesting conundrum.

23 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Yes OD, a rather interesting conundrum.

the only solution to such technical loop-holes would be just to add the surname [censored] to the banned names list

i'm sure your contacts in the demonland hierarchy could do us that small favour

52 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

the only solution to such technical loop-holes would be just to add the surname [censored] to the banned names list

i'm sure your contacts in the demonland hierarchy could do us that small favour

Not confident of that DC. There have been times when he wanted to close us down. 


  • Author
1 hour ago, daisycutter said:

the only solution to such technical loop-holes would be just to add the surname [censored] to the banned names list

i'm sure your contacts in the demonland hierarchy could do us that small favour

A great idea DC.

I can see that you are more than just a good looking human being.

Notice how I satisfied the woke minority with my description of you.

  • Author

WJ can you please arrange to ban the surname of the unmentionable on this thread, or DL in general.

11 minutes ago, Redleg said:

A great idea DC.

I can see that you are more than just a good looking human being.

Notice how I satisfied the woke minority with my description of you.

thanks, red. i have no problems being called a rooster or a [censored]

in fact when i was a kid it was common to call male friends  [censored]  (interchangeable with mate, cobber or digger for some)

wow even c.0.c.k (note the zero) got censored 

Edited by daisycutter

  • Author

Well it’s a new year and I think we have to fix up a major problem on here.

WCW and Uncle Bitters is just too volatile a romantic relationship to continue. It is just too distressing for the posters on here, being dragged into your various issues.

As self appointed Chairman ( Dictator), of the thread, I am decreeing that from now on, the two of you will be platonic best friends only and that should solve the problem.

It’s up to you two now, so enjoy your new best friend.

For the rest of you, I wish you all a happy, healthy and safe New Year and of course another Dees flag, the first of a trifecta of flags for us in the next 3 years.

Bah to you all - particularly lawyers !

As to WCW - good lord ! A demented termagant if ever I've seen one !

I wish myself a prosperous and ever more decadent 2023!


  • Author
10 minutes ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

Bah to you all - particularly lawyers !

As to WCW - good lord ! A demented termagant if ever I've seen one !

I wish myself a prosperous and ever more decadent 2023!

I always new this thread would be very educational.

Now I have learned the meaning of " termagant ".

5 minutes ago, Redleg said:

I always new this thread would be very educational.

Now I have learned the meaning of " termagant ".

Pleased to have enlightened you Red.

Surely you must agree my usage of that word  was elegant, accurate and appropriate to the context.

19 hours ago, Redleg said:

WJ can you please arrange to ban the surname of the unmentionable on this thread, or DL in general.

One last look then:

image.png.bf3511df253c459b7215936575a4eded.png

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    It's Game Day and the Demons are back on the road for their 3rd interstate game in 4 weeks as they face a fit and firing Crows at Adelaide Oval. With finals now out of our grasps what are you hoping from the Dees today?

    • 0 replies
  • WHAT’S NEXT? by The Oracle

    What’s next for a beleagured Melbourne Football Club down in form and confidence, facing  intense criticism and disapproval over some underwhelming recent performances and in the midst of a four game losing streak? Why, it’s Adelaide which boasts the best percentage in the AFL and has won six of its last seven games. The Crows are hot and not only that, the game is at the Adelaide Oval; yet another away fixture and the third in a row at a venue outside of Victoria. One of the problems the Demons have these days is that they rarely have the luxury of true home ground advantage, something they have enjoyed just once since mid April. 

    • 2 replies
  • REPORT: Gold Coast

    From the start, Melbourne’s performance against the Gold Coast Suns at Peoples First Stadium was nothing short of a massive botch up and it came down in the first instance to poor preparation. Rather than adequately preparing the team for battle against an opponent potentially on the skids after suffering three consecutive losses, the Demons looking anything but sharp and ready to play in the opening minutes of the game. By way of contrast, the Suns demonstrated a clear sense of purpose and will to win. From the very first bounce of the ball they were back to where they left off earlier in the season in Round Three when the teams met at the MCG. They ran rings around the Demons and finished the game off with a dominant six goal final term. This time, they produced another dominant quarter to start the game, restricting Melbourne to a solitary point to lead by six goals at the first break, by which time, the game was all but over.

    • 0 replies
  • CASEY: Gold Coast

    Coming off four consecutive victories and with a team filled with 17 AFL listed players, the Casey Demons took to their early morning encounter with the lowly Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium with the swagger of a team that thought a win was inevitable. They were smashing it for the first twenty minutes of the game after Tom Fullarton booted the first two goals but they then descended into an abyss of frustrating poor form and lackadaisical effort that saw the swagger and the early arrogance disappear by quarter time when their lead was overtaken by a more intense and committed opponent. The Suns continued to apply the pressure in the second quarter and got out to a three goal lead in mid term before the Demons fought back. A late goal to the home side before the half time bell saw them ten points up at the break and another surge in the third quarter saw them comfortably up with a 23 point lead at the final break.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    With their season all over bar the shouting the Demons head back on the road for the third week in a row as they return to Adelaide to take on the Crows. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 213 replies
  • POSTGAME: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    The Demons did not come to play from the opening bounce and let the Gold Coast kick the first 5 goals of the match. They then outscored the Suns for the next 3 quarters but it was too little too late and their season is now effectively over.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 231 replies