Any live feeds on this??

Found it Live feed

Edited May 12, 201114 yr by daisycutter

As I wrote in the other thread on this, Redlegs argument seems bullet-proof to me. If he is named he cannot have concussion (unless Adelaide are silly enough to break the new direction), hence less force whatever the outcome of the rest of this baloney.

My only concern would be how forceful was the AFL's lay-off next week for concussion directive? Must rest, or should be rested?

Edited May 12, 201114 yr by sue

Adelaide have tabled a new medical report as new evidence stating that Dangerfield has trained well and suffers no lingering effects. Not sure it will change everything but surely a better start.

As I wrote in the other thread on this, Redlegs argument seems bullet-proof to me. If he is named he cannot have concussion (unless Adelaide are silly enough to break the new direction), hence less force whatever the outcome of the rest of this baloney.

My only concern would be how forceful was the AFL's lay-off next week for concussion directive? Must rest, or should be rested?

think you'll find its ultimately at doctors discretion (AFL "recommend" 1 week off)

It's interesting to note after watching the game again today. Dangerfield was shown sitting on the bench (7 minutes after leaving the ground), he looked fine.

I like this Gallbaly guy, has made some fair comments so fair!

I believe it does. The AFL decreed earlier this year that no player should be played the week after getting concussion.

Sorry Redleg, but you are not correct. The new concussion guidelines state that a concussed player is not to return to the ground on the day of the concussion.

What happens the following week is dependant upon the recovery. ie fully recovered - can play. Still symptomatic - can't play.

If Dangerfield is asymptomatic at rest and post-exercise, and his neuropsychological test has returned to baseline, he may play.

Regards....

Gone

Appeal dismissed!!!

FFS

Should be straight to the supreme court tomorrow for an injunction. Don't care if it is ultimately unsuccessful but we need to make a stand. The afl have always shafted us. I want its to fight it.

Sorry Redleg, but you are not correct. The new concussion guidelines state that a concussed player is not to return to the ground on the day of the concussion.

What happens the following week is dependant upon the recovery. ie fully recovered - can play. Still symptomatic - can't play.

If Dangerfield is asymptomatic at rest and post-exercise, and his neuropsychological test has returned to baseline, he may play.

Regards....

If that's what the concussion guidelines say, then I got that bit wrong.

Should be straight to the supreme court tomorrow for an injunction. Don't care if it is ultimately unsuccessful but we need to make a stand. The afl have always shafted us. I want its to fight it.

I don't agree that we should be taking it to court.

I'm going to vote "no".

I'm going to vote "no".

Agree. Time to get on with it and beat North.