Jump to content

Jamar and Miller Signed to Dees

Featured Replies

Posted

Herald Sun just reported that Miller and Jamar have both signed 1 year deals with the MFC.

 

How does Miller do it? Really, just how does he do it.

 
  • Author

I'm with you Deestroy All....

The guy simply cannot play and if he is worth anything right now may be worth zilch by this time next year.

1 Year? Anything to do with GC17?

My first thought exactly. They've got a year to become mainstays of the team or become mainstays of the news GC side.


1 year is very odd!

I understand the Gold Cost scenario on our behalf, but why would a player agree to a 1 year deal?

Unless of course Miller has his heart set on going back to QLD.

Jamar on a 1 year extension is weird.

HAPPY WITH THIS

Both have to perform next yr

could have almost signed miller for 2 then flogged him to GC next yr

 

Leaves Miller placed to be our out of contract offering to GC next year should that need arise.

If he has a blinder of a season, we might regret it. More likely, we will like it.


Jamar has only looked like a decent footballer this year, I've been his biggest critic, but this year he has really shown something.

1 year sounds good to me, keep playing like this, prove it's no fluke, and get a better contract at the end of it / or/ improve his market value even more.

If he goes back to being Donuts, then we aren't locked into anything.

1 Year? Anything to do with GC17?

he'll definitely be our uncontracted player that ends up at gold coast (if they want him)...knowing our luck, he'll show something next year

or ricky petterd. both qland boys

Miller 1 year is a good result for us and for Miller. Glad he is staying too, despite his abilities.

Jamar 1 year, seems strange to me.

WTF???

I hope they know what they're doing here. If we sign Miller and then keep Newton as well....surely not.

First post today, a pleasant surprise - awesome new site skin!!


WTF???

I hope they know what they're doing here. If we sign Miller and then keep Newton as well....surely not.

First post today, a pleasant surprise - awesome new site skin!!

Newton is contracted for another year, which is exactly why a 1 year deal for Miller is a very smart move.

Don't need to be locked into longer-term contracts with borderline best 22 players.

Miller has a role to play off the field, and maybe on it as well, depending on injuries and the development of Watts in 2010. We lose nothing by giving him 1 year, as he would have netted us nothing in trade week.

Interesting they are both one year contracts, that smells of Miller to GC17 to me.

We were stuffed next year if we did not resign Jamar, surprised he did not get at least a 2 year deal

How does Miller do it? Really, just how does he do it.

1 Year? Anything to do with GC17?

EVERYTHING to do with GC. Miller has to put himself in line for the best money he can get. The trouble is, just because they CAN take him doesn't mean they WILL.

The Jamar one is of more concern. Only one has to sacrifice themselves to GC. Jamar on one year perhaps is just agreed upon so that he knows next year's trade period (which could be EQUALLY as busy) will see his name floated again.

interesting .. Had heard Russian was to sign for 2 , wonder how and why he agrred t one at Melbourne when he could have easily got 2-3 at Port ? Strange days indeed :lol:


Newton is contracted for another year, which is exactly why a 1 year deal for Miller is a very smart move.

Don't need to be locked into longer-term contracts with borderline best 22 players.

Miller has a role to play off the field, and maybe on it as well, depending on injuries and the development of Watts in 2010. We lose nothing by giving him 1 year, as he would have netted us nothing in trade week.

right on the money with that one Jaded

LOL @ 1 year extensions.

1 year is very odd!

I understand the Gold Cost scenario on our behalf, but why would a player agree to a 1 year deal?

Unless of course Miller has his heart set on going back to QLD.

Jamar on a 1 year extension is weird.

My thoughts. However, all player managers were on notice by GC to have their players leave their options open for next year, I think it's a good move on both sides. It could indicate the Dees topping up with a pick from GC next year.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tab...30/default.aspx

1 year is odd. Jamar should have got 2. Maybe he wants to keep his GC options open.

Both player & club.

Leaves Miller placed to be our out of contract offering to GC next year should that need arise.

If he has a blinder of a season, we might regret it. More likely, we will like it.

If he has a blinder, maybe the latter.

Miller 1 year is a good result for us and for Miller. Glad he is staying too, despite his abilities.

Jamar 1 year, seems strange to me.

Agree on both counts.

interesting .. Had heard Russian was to sign for 2 , wonder how and why he agrred t one at Melbourne when he could have easily got 2-3 at Port ? Strange days indeed

 

Good result for Melbourne. Also good for Jamar, he should back himself to have a good season next year to get a better contract or to be picked up by GC17.

don't complain! means we're not locked down next year. Wonder what we'll be saying/seeing in a years time...


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREGAME: St. Kilda

    The Demons come face to face with St. Kilda for the second time this season for their return clash at Marvel Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 82 replies
  • PODCAST: Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 22nd July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to Carlton at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 19 replies
  • VOTES: Carlton

    Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Kozzy Pickett & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Like
    • 21 replies
  • POSTGAME: Carlton

    A near full strength Demons were outplayed all night against a Blues outfit that was under the pump and missing at least 9 or 10 of the best players. Time for some hard decisions to be made across the board.

      • Like
    • 289 replies
  • GAMEDAY: Carlton

    It's Game Day and Clarry's 200th game and for anyone who hates Carlton as much as I do this is our Grand Final. Go Dees.

    • 669 replies
  • PREVIEW: Carlton

    Good evening, Demon fans and welcome back to the Demonland Podcast ... it’s time to discuss this week’s game against the Blues. Will the Demons celebrate Clayton Oliver’s 200th game with a victory? We have a number of callers waiting on line … Leopold Bloom: Carlton and Melbourne are both out of finals contention with six wins and eleven losses, and are undoubtedly the two most underwhelming and disappointing teams of 2025. Both had high expectations at the start of participating and advancing deep into the finals, but instead, they have consistently underperformed and disappointed themselves and their supporters throughout the year. However, I am inclined to give the Demons the benefit of the doubt, as they have made some progress in addressing their issues after a disastrous start. In contrast, the Blues are struggling across the board and do not appear to be making any notable improvements. They are regressing, and a significant loss is looming on Saturday night. Max Gawn in the ruck will be huge and the Demon midfield have a point to prove after lowering their colours in so many close calls.

    • 0 replies