Diamond_Jim

A Geelong player had a kick on the run from around twenty. Looked to be sailing through the middle and barely scored a point. Although Casey didn't score they probably had more inside fifties than Geelong had in the first quarter. Jkh in everything as you would expect in agame like this. Casey players tapping and punching the ball which is good play in these conditions

Terrible game Ruined by the wind

Strong mark and goal to kielty

Hardly out of our fifty but no score

Scrappy game. Absolute gale blowing to the end the dees are kicking to

Maybe but if we don't know what Josh Wagner delivers there is something wrong. In simple terms he is a level 30 player...outside the 22 but handy backup for a back half shortage. Good thing is that he is not injury prone which seems to be a big issue with our 25-35 range

Some very big games this weekend for shaping the 4 and the eight. Absolute #^&* that ours isn't one of them. I see they are talking of Caleb Daniels as possible AA so there is hope for Spartacus yet.

At the start of the season we would have earmarked this game as an 8 pointer to determine if we made top 4 if not top 2. What can one say

If correct probably means Stretch gets another year with Maynard departing.

With Geelong 7th on the ladder and Casey ninth this is the classic 8 point game. One game and percentage separate the two teams. Geelong only have three players on the injured list so they will be fielding a strong team. No Preuss who has been dominating at this level makes it a tough ask but the weather is 17 degrees with strong northerlies suggesting a relatively pleasant day out.

Oliver is this season becoming another example of an MFC stuff up. Before you argue take a moment and think about it. Oliver and Gawn are the kind you build teams around and we have......

your words

I found this website on the Wandering Wagners... sounds like we need their help Our goal is to help as many people as we can, whether it's big or small, so tell us what we can do! If you are struggling with anything in your life, just send us an email and ask for help. Sometimes it's hard to speak out to your friends and family about the problems that you are having, but maybe we can help? https://wanderingwagners.com/about-us/

Are you ready to join the dark side.. come across to the thread that will probably outgrow the Watts and Hogan have to go /stay discussions Agree... Lewis has no place in this team.. (respect his ability by the way)

"The AFL's TV ratings have fallen considerably, with a 12.8 per cent decline to the end of their regular season. Cumulative season audience figures for the two codes highlight the NRL's dominance. The NRL's cumulative audience this season was 94.3 million, compared to the AFL's live audience of 89.2m." From the SMH of September 10 2018 PS.. don't forget that the NRL figures include three State of Origin Games which are massive television events. PPS.. the comparison is made pre finals so perhaps AFL caught up

starting to look like that... has the feel of Dunn and Garland.. pity

my guess is Dunkley, Baker, Corey Wagner and Tim Smith PS just noticed Salem named in the forward pocket

16 a side at VFL level for the next 2 years plus (SANFL and WFL) 6-6-6 for last quarter only... it is actually reducing scoring unless risks are taken which teams will not take in the forst three quarters. Reduction of interchange numbers by itself will just change the length of the rest periods. It may have a slight impact upon player fatigue but it's not that simple. Probably needs to be reduction of the number on the bench. Hate the sub rule but you could have one sub for umpire (third party) confirmed injuries. On the complete flip side..a lot of these comments are coming from ground attendees and at game commentators. On TV it has always been difficult to capture the quick run on play. May need to rethink the TV coverage angles if it really worked.

Demonland... I think Casey play the Cats not the Dogs...

so based on Weideman being in the rehab group at training I assume he is no goer for this weekend. Tim Smith to return for another round of musical deckchairs perhaps.

Of course as Super Mercado says it's not that we just don't score it is that we let the ball out so easily. Every club knows how to beat the Goodwin game plan. Some are better at executing than others but just stack the backline and then the quick release in a manner that breaks the zone. Take a step back and think why we play well against Hawthorn. They don't play quick release and our mids etc have time to get back. When they did play quick release in the H&A match in 2018 they slaughtered us. Hell .. how many times have the saints beat us and they just sacked their coach. It's really starting to become a bit of a joke issue.

the 50m penalties were brought in because Hawthorn decided in a finals series during the late 80's that it was better to give away the 15 metre penalty than to allow the opposition to play on. The problem with removing the protected areas is that players will deliberately run through a particular area to increase the zone strength. These days they even use the umpire as part of the zone (remember the runners). I suppose I am saying that the coaches will always bend the rules to the max.

Interchange reduction at AFL level plus at VFL level reduction in player numbers on field by two players per team. Trial for two years. One could even trial the reduced player numbers on alternate weeks to get a better sample. It's not rocket science. (VFA used to play with 16 players on ground at once.)

say it again please

Great point have always thought that the 55-60 metre set shot guy who can also play back would be a very damaging player