IRW
Members
-
Joined
Everything posted by IRW
-
-
It's difficult to understand why Hogan and that other guy went West then. Tip..they didn't want to play for the MFC. And then there's Grundy and likely Petty
-
Remind me how many games Petty played forward.. It's a speculation, not a solution. Smith won't be an answer and that's not bad luck. TMac and BBB..they have to suck it up and find alternatives...should have done it 2 seasons ago notwithstanding a few cameos that were never going to last
-
Yeah Dermie is mostly nonsense without completion. This one is correct.. the need for JVR to learn his position as well as the need for a big body; but how would you " sell" MFC to a big forward you wanted to lever out of another Club And what trade price would you ask if it meant Melbourne was going to be a serious threat to your Club?
-
Ground hog day..a perfect summary. Only one thing needs to change and it's name is Goodwin. All the reasonable observations the frustrations and theoretical possible fixes are really just blah blah blah. Still ,its a good movie if you like a complete lack of authority and hoping the dice will fall correctly every so often to keep you at the table
-
-
Mate if he played for Melbourne we would be saying something altogether different such as his regret for the accident, how he's devastated at what he has caused and that he accepts his aggression has to tempered in the future. In reality he may be genuinely remorseful..you don't know and neither do I . Put a sock in it and go for the AFL and their two faced self serving response to most everthing. Maynard should have got 3 weeks minimum ( however they work it out) and the rules clarified. I imagine MFC will get very little joy from the system and trust that Gus will be around the Club in some shape or form while he moves on with his new career. Ongoing best medical oversight is the least the AFL should provide
-
No problem with that truth. It wasn't what I responded to though
And that's the AFL's manipulation? Seriously?
Those two teams played well...the Blues when it mattered The Lions as well. Melbourne had injuries and underperformed in various ways Which bit was the AFL? I think you're confusing them with the commentariat...which is a little hard to do, although both are generally unappealing. ps Maynard ,although he'd be a useful addition to the Dee's, isn't good enough to count in your argument
The Pies are great viewing...unusually so. Carlton altogether just another team on the up who have guys who can actually mark the ball. Can you explain how the AFL are organising the teams to play the Grand Final please? Thankyou in advance
Defence ,running in a straight line is Tom's only chance..and he's probably depth down back anyway.
You are being very kind to the cheer squad of Australian Test Cricket "commentators "
You've got one objection to the post you are replying to. Hardly a comprehensive take down. I think Grundy might be " huge" at Sydney. Or not
As I recall the scorn on here for the Cats over last decade I assume yours is not a happy prognostication I suspect it may be correct though, but then I have always thought that being in the "conversation " year after year was a good thing for supporters,while "bookending" Flags was better than half a century droughts
And has been for two years. Why has he kept playing?
Yea he has power rather than speed
Is that like Kossi almost taking marks? It frustrates the demon hell out of me?
Has Tom been training " back " all the time? I've been away but know he didn't really test his abilities to turn/ manoeuvre prior to the horrible Finals game last season. Running straight out the the backline would seem be a a sensible option. Back to the future for Tom .He was good down there..a swap with Petty
Let's see that next pick then I admire you optimism btw
Another big bodied competitive beast..oh wait!
If it's to be it's up to me
