Grimes Times

Another option would be the Giants who look like they may end up with 10, 13 & 15. 26 and Pruess for 13 values Pruess at 37

Me three. While Smith was perfect as he was free and could fill a hole for 2-3 years while somebody else developed. Phillips cost draft picks and would be excess once Macrea?? is ready.

The Dogs dont want picks this year (early picks anyway) so I cant see them do it for future first, IMO they are more likely to do a similar deal for this years first.

Dunkley has just formally requested a trade which if the dog do a trade with ess they will get another 1 maybe 2 first round picks which would mean I think they would be even more happy to except the above trade.

14 and Pruess for 10 Frost + Pruess + Hannan = 10

26 and 31 for 14 (WB) even throw in Hannan or pick 53/68 Take Macrea at 14

Hunt 10.2 ANB 7.0 Spargo 8.1 Tmac 7.1 Hannann 7.3 Weed 19.8 Melk 15.8 Fritz 22.24 Fritch wasn't his only forward he worked with. SNAP

https://www.afl.com.au/news/523051/rebuilding-roos-set-to-poach-bulldogs-defender Looks like North have recruited a WB rookie as he has been on the rookie list for 2 years and if you reject any offer from the WB to either go on the rookie list for a third year or onto the main list you become a delisted free agent and are able to sign with the club of your choice. Anyway looking thru clubs rookie list a couple of names popped up. Thoughts. Brody Mihocek Sydney Stack Tom Atkins All have been rookies for at least 2 years so either have to agree to stay on rookie list for a 3rd or be upgraded to main list. Or can reject there clubs offers and become a DFA.

Higgins??

......and in the same time has burnt first rounders picks on the likes of Lachlan Fogarty (pick 22),N.Cockatoo (10) , D.Lang (16) , J.Thurlow (16) B.Smelts (15) and Mitch Brown.(15)

Why would North pay some of his contract when he is out of contract. That sort of deal only happens when you trade a player in contract. Ie if we traded Tmac

Wells is a bit of a myth. Got it right and had unbelievable drafting in 1999 and 2001 but after that just average hits and misses like everyone else.

Hes off to Hawthorne

Corr to North 2nd road pick compo to GWS GWS compo pick to Melb - Pruess to GWS Compo pick to North - Brown to Mleb

2 years ago we beat this team in a final with all bar the highlighted players playing in the GF. They have been replaced with Dahlaus, Rohan, Miers, Simpson and Stanley. We have the foundations, sure we need to alter a few things, have a bit of luck, players to prove but things can change quickly.

I guess I needed to add the sarcasm emoji going by the reply's.

Tigers will now pounce Big claim. Spill the beans.

did anyone else notice Oliver laughing every time Viney got Brownlow votes. Definitely something not right there. Also Viney wasn't siting with Max or Clarry.

I think he kicks perfectly straight 95% of the time they just go in the wrong direction. His kicks dont vary left, right or hook. It might be just a simple alignment problem.

slightly off topic but can Geelongs tall slow back 6 contain Brisbane small forwards??

Though similar. I read that they where not happy with the possibility of Viney using them to get a better deal. Thought it wouldn't put it past them to show some interest to make us pay.

and 199cm Jackson gets the third

so the price would be Philips for Tmac while smith is still free

Dogs need points for there NGA player. Offer them 23 + 39 (pruess) + 62 for 12 and Hannan. Turn 23 plus 2 non best 22 players into 12 and gives dogs extra points. Its overs but dogs not going to deal 12 unless the points are in there favour.

big difference is one comes free and the other would cost a 2nd round pick