tonatopia

I am happy with result. It shows good character by the majority of demonlanders that want to create a united front. Really, it would give him a boost if he ever decided to read the thread. I want him to succeed, I just don't think he will. I think this game against gc at home, will be the biggest game in neelds life, so far. We are playing a team of players that are Cooks vintage. Even tho this survey shows unanimous support, everybody here should be concerned if we lose at the g against 2year old gc. If I was neeld, tanking would be the last thing on my mind.

More excuses.

You carnt really argue with that.

Why not have viney as head recruiter? What does he lack for?

Give him enough rope. Still, let's see how we go against gc. They are still amatures. If we font beat them, we are in trouble. Especially with the blind faith around here. Really, this club is more like a cult.

I'm not into psychological evaluations or beep test bunnies. Even an amature like me picked darling over cook. Dosnt take scientific analysis, just a good eye and a taste for dominance. I think viney has got that qualities to mold a team in his character.

I think he is perfect. No more skinny sorties. I think his credentials make him over qualified. He is exactly what we need as head recruiter to be the hardest team to play against. If we are with neeld, then let's take it to the enth degree.

My my, sacking a guy after 1 year withou even having a chance to prove his ability as senior recruiter. Stinks of hypocrisy rr. Your a joke.

Good move. The Viney family has the inside info. Perfect appointment.

The masses have spoken. I will shut up about it. I hope the majority is correct, and we can achieve success. However, I think a 3 year 'faith contract' is a bit rich. Time to re-assess midway thru 2013. Go Dees.

Lets see what happens against GC.

Keep it open.

It's a long season. Let's see against gc at home.

What if we can replace him with Roos or malthouse? Would our club be better off?

Whether we win the vote now or in 2014. Neeld ain't our man. It just takes time for some to wake up. 'slap'!

Before you vote, please read the thread, 'total faith in the neeld way'. Healthy debate about the subject.

Bang!

Cheers hardnut Cheers Thai Cheers hazy Cheers Cali I think we got our point across. Stubborn little fcukers.

Jab, jab, jab, bang! Knockout!

Bb, boy you waffle.

I don't even reckon he is a good bloke, let alone his coaching.

1. Turn the number 1 clearance duo in jamar and moloney into spuds 2. Ruin trengove 3. Have no faith in our list 4. Implement a stale game plan 5. Squirm when he is under pressure 6. Turn a quick team into slow 7. Refuse to use the corridor at all 8. Refuse to be flexible in game style 9. kill natural player instinct 10. Get smashed by every other team 11. Be the easiest team to play against 12. Turn us into a laughing stock 13. Ruin tapscott 14. Refuse to play Gysberts 15. Only have mild support for Jurrah 16. Persist with seller when we have plenty of tall backs 17. Consider drafting cloke 18. Only win 1 game against a pathetic bombers 19. Divide the club and supporters 20. Being relatively pleased with our progress 21. Using kpi's to justify the teams development 22. Start games pathetically 23. Not being able to inspire the club 24. Not being able to communicate with the media in a satisfactory manner 25. Blaming the list and not himself 26. destroying our attacking flair 27. Turn us into robots 28. Destroy our basic skills 29. Arouse no confidence whatsoever 30. Has no emotional intelligence 31. Keeping Brian royal 32. Recruiting plodders, couch, seller, magner 33. Not even being competitive 34. Reactionary positional changes 35. General lack of player development 36. Negative attitude towards football I can keep going on about all the players he has made look second rate bar about 6. Rr really only mentioned 2 positives, sacking prendergast and recruiting Clark. We will probably lose against gc and he will be a goner.

1. Turn the number 1 clearance duo in jamar and moloney into spuds 2. Ruin trengove 3. Have no faith in our list 4. Implement a stale game plan 5. Squirm when he is under pressure 6. Turn a quick team into slow 7. Refuse to use the corridor at all 8. Refuse to be flexible in game style 9. kill natural player instinct 10. Get smashed by every other team 11. Be the easiest team to play against 12. Turn us into a laughing stock 13. Ruin tapscott 14. Refuse to play Gysberts 15. Only have mild support for Jurrah 16. Persist with seller when we have plenty of tall backs 17. Consider drafting cloke 18. Only win 1 game against a pathetic bombers 19. Divide the club and supporters 20. Being relatively pleased with our progress 21. Using kpi's to justify the teams development 22. Start games pathetically 23. Not being able to inspire the club 24. Not being able to communicate with the media in a satisfactory manner 25. Blaming the list and not himself 26. destroying our attacking flair 27. Turn us into robots 28. Destroy our basic skills 29. Arouse no confidence whatsoever 30. Has no emotional intelligence 31. Keeping Brian royal 32. Recruiting plodders, couch, seller, magner 33. Not even being competitive 34. Reactionary positional changes 35. General lack of player development 36. Negative attitude towards football I can keep going on about all the players he has made look second rate bar about 6. Rr really only mentioned 2 positives, sacking prendergast and recruiting Clark. We will probably lose against gc and he will be a goner.

Actually, I would give Club champions or Captains the respect to retire when THEY see fit. It dosnt mean we have to play them in the seniors or pay them above award wages, but I think if they want to be involved in the playing group, they should be allowed. And, whats wrong with having a MFC idealogy set in stone at the MCG. You fellas really have a chip on your shoulder. Maybe I hit a raw nerve.

Whats wrong with you RR & RF? They are suggestions.