Jump to content

Demon Dynasty

Members
  • Posts

    15,680
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by Demon Dynasty

  1. No there's enough quality defenders down there and Salo's experienced enough to handle some time higher up the ground. While i'm not saying you don't play him in his usual role for a fair chunk, we need to role the die a little here in order to kick a winning score and get him higher up the ground a fair bit. As long as it isn't Salo doing the kicking for goal that is! Clear instructions that he must pass it off when the options are there! Unless he's 25 meters out (or less) and not much angle to speak of.
  2. So a complete 180 from last week. Not asking for much Wod.... seems reasonable. At least from where i'm sitting! 😂
  3. Correct. Same as LJ. We were a man down much of the time from about Rnd 12 onwards and even worse when we hit finals. Goes some way towards explaining how our second half of the year was so shizen.
  4. Only via a dubious goal line review. In a general sense you are correct but on his day JJ is up there. The question is will he bring it for three quarters or more on the night! If he can only manage a quarter or two at his best then yes we might be in trouble. Another big watch for mine is Viney. His last three finals haven't been his greatest performances vs his usual VG or better H&As. We need Kozzy to play more mid field & stoppage minutes along with Tracc to play substantial time inside 50.
  5. Viney might shark the odd tap. Kozzy also but would need to ensure he's attending CBs when Max is resting. Kozzy should be playing significant minutes in there vs his usual average times anyway imho. We didn't play him through there enougb last week. He's finally learning the ropes there and becoming quite effective. Not sure why Goody didn't persevere with this. Might also help him shake off any tag and get involved early. Then drift goal side of the stoppages around ground. Be can also use his elite skills and pace / agility out of stoppage to hit up a few targets insside 50. An area of the game where we are usually pretty shizen. The Pies showed us up in this area (last kick inside 50) last week.
  6. Highly unlikely we ruck T-Mac at CBs. Joel Smith. T-Mac as the solitary tall forward although they might rest Max there on occasions.
  7. I don't listen any more but a very poor replacement of KB. But better at fence sitting which suits the AFL agenda of "wherever possible don't upset the apple cart, keep the status quo pls" Jumps on band wagons every other week and a huge Carlton fan boy which usually over rides any neutrality when assessing their performance etc.
  8. Absolutely... i thought the Chardonnay sipping set was supposed to be Adelaide (or us with the cheeseboards). He'll be up at the snow next...
  9. The AFL will never implement a sin-bin , red card style system as it would relinquish their ability to determine which players and clubs are to benefit from their preferred (internal) narrative of "let the stars (from select clubs that we wish to see at the top, wherever possible) play on" regardless of their indiscretions. If the AFL was serious about protecting the head and ensuring some form of fair "eye for an eye" on game day itself so that the offending team doesn't gain a significant advantage, it should introduce one. But it won't. And will use the theme of "our game is unique and "we don't want to become like soccer or rugby" as the nonsense reasoning for not doing so. Many of the fans and media also fall for this stupid mantra coming from the corrupt AFL circus masters and would rather see one team continue to have a ridiculous advantage on game day, even in a final, as we witnessed last Thurs. If Mayfart knows he has a good chance of being binned or red carded for the entire match were he to commit that act, there's no way he's lowering the shoulder. He's catching Gus on the way down, arms extended and both players would more than likely have played out the game. Gus would also not be considering his future in it, as we speak.
  10. Both have points but the cupboard is bare as BBP has hinted. Over to you floody
  11. Replaced as sub with either Woe or AMW. Smith is the option here but then someone would need to replace him in the 22.
  12. Finally someone in the media has the guts to call this for what it was. Well said. Unfortunately we lost a player (easily in our best 5 this season) for the entire match. He also misses this week and may never play again. But that's ok.. apparently it was 'just a football act, an accident and he flinched, what more could he have done!??" I hope the boys are channeling any anger and frustration into a huge opening quarter on Friday. It's a fine line between harnessing that and losing the plot but Goody def needs to tap into this starting this week. US AGAINST THEM! Smash the [censored] lot of em. GO THE MIGHTY DEMONS
  13. Ins: Tomo, Turner, JJ, Spargo Outs: Salem (omitted), JVR (susp), Gus (conc) & Chandler (omitted) Tomo comes in for Salem to cover their resting ruck. Allows Lever to play in his preferred role. May to Curnow no brainer. Hibbo to stay in playing a defensive role on Owies. Turner for JVR JJ for Gus. Hard tag on Crippa. Don't care if he only gets 5 possies. Keep Crippa to 16 or so and a goal (max) and we should win. Spargo for Chandler Sub: AMW or Woe
  14. I feel your expectations are not in line with reality Super. This comp and those that lead it has shown itself to be completely compromised for decades now. Absolutely nothing has changed on the inside in terms of its leadershiip style / culture, the influencers from club land (those now participating and other ex offcio power brokers) and no doubt others who have a say in the outcomes and pull some strings. For as long as you follow this comp and support a team that doesn't sit within the AFL's circle of influence you have to expect more of the same biased outcomes, iniquities and corrupt decisions such as we witnessed last night. It is not a fair nor equitable competition and probably never will be.
  15. Yes but i doubt they will as all clubs have their head in the trough. Nothing will change unless the club's stand up and shout. Which they won't. They all just fall in to line behind the Circus master. Same with most of the media morons. They know who butters their bread.
  16. Some ppl are easily fooled. So Azz you're saying that as Gus ran off the square and came towards the 50 (with no one immediately ahead of him at that point until he was about to launch), Gus should've anticipated that, as he landed his first step on the same foot he kicked the ball with, his landing step should've been a half meter over to the left to send his body in that direction pre-empting and missing the now lowered shoulder of Mayfart? (where hands were originally in a raised position to spoil). Oh dear. Might wanna take a bex and go have a lie down son. Quite possibly the 2nd worst post of the year (behind a couple from that rollo bloke threatening to bash ppl which would be No.1 x two or three).
  17. Red it wouldn't have mattered what Mayfart said... The circus act was already in play as soon as the siren went. He was always getting off. It was just a matter of how and then coming up with the script / screenplay.
  18. I'm the last person to know if he has a case or not but as a pub test i would think he'd have a fabulous case of negligence and derelict in duty from here. The AFL have effectively condoned a form of head high impact & resulting concussion using 'a footy act' and 'no other choice but to protect oneself' as their argument.
  19. Never trusted anything coming from them going back to the VFL days Macca. The corruption set in fron the late 60s / early 70s when the VFL renegged on the country zoning rotations after some of the clubs, who originally agreed to the idea, went back on their word. I've been saying for decades, including on here, that it's just one giant circus lead by a few masters that pull all the strings. Some of those masters are either in cahoots with the big clubs or were at them at some point and are now pushing the barrow either via their connections within the AFL or are imbedded within. Our decades in the wilderness ensured that we missed the boat in terms of getting our fair share of representation / influence into the halls. The rats have long been in command now and we are well and truly still on the outside looking in. A bit part actor if you will. I'm not sure becoming a big club, in terms of an increased following, will automatically change this much in the short term until or unless we get some ex club officials/players imbedded into or influencing the day to day there. That could be decades away yet.
  20. Yes that is also true but would depend on the club/player in question. Regardless no one knows who will be favoured and who wouldn’t so again, the act is now legal in the eyes of the AFL.
  21. 100%. Bar Viney the response was shizen. There's no other enforcers unfortunately
  22. No it has to include the jump Kev assuming oppo player is in the act of / or has already completed the kick (just). The AFL has now comfirmed that provided you are 'making an attempt' to smother, you are entitled to protect yourself by tucking up on the way down and leading with either shoulder. This is now acceptable and how you protect yourself from an oncoming likely collision. The consequence of doing so is now a moot point that no player needs to concern themselves with. Just throw the arms in the air then tuck straight afterwards and shoulder away. Every kicker is now fair game.
  23. As long as they jump in the air first feigning a smother / spoil Kev.... then yes
  24. Not in a corrupt AFL it doesn't Jaded. It's a circus that's very massaged and controlled towards producing preferred outcomes and results as we are about to witness (again... Crippa brownlow, Barry Hall...Premiership!)
×
×
  • Create New...