monoccular

Deja vu all over again.

If one really thinks more about it in an evolutionary way, maggots metamorphosise into blowflies, which have compound eyes, so possibly not quite so far fetched as first appears. On the Hawkins issue, I can’t remember which case but the MRO and or tribunals have very clearly said, if you pin the arms and the head hits the ground you are guilty. I guess they will do a Donut Dan on this one - “don’t remember”

Inside or outside?

The MRO is not a lottery, which is an exercise in random numbers. The MRO has very predictable numbers and were it sold as a lottery would quickly go broke.

He may love the outcome but only if he is told to. So predictable that a Geelong star will be freed. Dangerfield was, as has a recently used term, a footy action, whereas Hawkins was undue force. Certainly far far worse than Viney.

Some like it, some love it, but I cannot see the sense as it so much (more even than usual) depends on umpires interpretation and diligence, and the penalty can be absurd. Hate to say it but looks innocent (that said, ANB would get 3-4) Any footage of the Hawkins one?

Both will get off under the “Innocent Cat veteran” rule.

Don’t we all know that?

Hasn’t been told yet whether to look at it or not.

I don’t recall that there are degrees of tenuousness. Most importantly, did ch 7 make a judgement? If not Christian won’t even look at it.

Trealor seems to have learned the art of the Bulldog throw.

Only watched Q4 - is it too much a mixed metaphor to say frost seems on fire?

Maybe the cheque bounced?

Haven’t watched. Is he giving Frosty a rest?

FFS. Sick of this. win the next 5 games = flag. Stuff the others.

Tends to happen when one finishes top 4. (Fortunately for us given our record v 14-17th).

Some raw stats are just so misleading

But it is counterintuitive nonetheless Geriatric Geelong will find it harder than most - maybe Scott 😮will use it to try to “justify” a home final at KP. As I said after they beat us, when we were off the boil, they have been gifted an enormous talent base, and continue to do so through one sided selective academy zoning.

Regardless of outcome and who gets it - this statue on the mark rule is just so absolutely counterintuitive. I know some like it but a 50 penalty for running backwards or a step sideways is just such an overkill.

🙄.

thought you meant the move to the boardroom with his resignation letter.

Just turned on. Nice 6 meter kick mark to give Tigers first shot at goal Q2

Trouble is that they would replace one half brain dead apparatchik with another of similar “quality”. One who also takes orders from the commentariat and from AFL HQ despite the “independent” title.

Stephen May says high, too

You mean sees what he is told to see - by the commentariat and without doubt AFL HQ.