Jump to content

monoccular

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by monoccular

  1. Yet another unpenalised throw.
  2. Desperately needed that one Tom. Now for another one or two, please
  3. Amon threw out of a tackle - holding the man !!
  4. FFS Oliver pulled off the ball - ignored - Port goal. playing 22 vs 25, again
  5. May pushed in face - not high! FFS
  6. Must think it is the Easter round - crucifying us.
  7. Yes, Max is .... but we seem to get a lot more clearances when LJ is rucking. I must say I was a bit surprised to see him getting a few crumbing goals - always seemed to me to be a mark / free and set shot sort of forward. Good luck to him - and the final scoreline (in our favour) from that night would be more than handy. Port looked (only saw the BB highlights) to be very dispirited. (Where were the two teams on the ladder at that time?)
  8. Surely not irrelevant - goals still need to be kicked. Unlike soccer we don't have nil all draws.
  9. A repeat, (even if only 50%), would be great.
  10. Brayshaw??? Didn't you watch the last couple of games???
  11. One problem of course is that the VFL is so dysfunctional, (even before COVID lockdowns), that one cannot rely on playing any given week, and with ridiculous number of teams in the competition, getting a decent contest is quite uncertain.
  12. For what it is worth, wasn’t MarkWilliams quoted as saying he is not interested in a head coaching gig again?
  13. I have raised the question several times over the last 20 years, do we have a sports psychologist? If not, why not? Totally agree - but we need to make a genuine bold statement Thursday night, and right from the first bounce. Cannot afford yet another sleepy start. Yet all the mainstream media bleat on and in about is the baby bombers.
  14. I too thought that Hibbing has been out of sorts but looking at replays he has done a great job despite Green’s goals. PS. Just saying, Weed was in those teams too. Association does not equate to causation. We can only try to beat the team that we face. (Remember that the [censored] cats didn’t have Dangerfield and Cameron when we beat them.)
  15. One important aspect that doesn’t get discussed much is that GW$ have been gifted an enormously talented list - both of their supporters should be very [censored] off that they are not perpetual premiers. Little consolation I know, but with any semblance of any forward structure and connection we should have accounted for them easily.
  16. "Oh, but don't forget to swoon over the baby Bombers"!! ?
  17. Seriously - WTF WCE??
  18. Actually closer to 6 decades than 4.
  19. Someone in another thread suggested JSmith, which would be a backwards leap - Weed would depend on what he does and how he does it tonight. Anyine know if the opposition are any good?
  20. Except that BB and JM’s biggest weaknesses are ….. lack of forward pressure. Why the hell when, what, 35-40 meters out on a slight angle does Tommy do the banana and not a drop punt? As bad as Jackson’s dribble last week and far more costly. Starting to think pretender not contender. ?
  21. Can’t kick goals - can’t win. Get back to basics MFC.
  22. About 6-8 throws (both teams) in the last few minutes. Not the rule of the week (or the night)??
  23. But Geelong are getting an absolute armchair ride from the umpires. (14-9 for what it is worth). And I have lost count on how many throws and not HTB the Cats get away with. Cats also go head down into an opponent -> high contact.
  24. I would only want Essendon to win to widen the gap between Cats and us, and the top 4, but as others have said a very dubious triple 50 meter penalty after the siren giving the Cats a one point win (or maybe a draw) would be schadenfreude. I am absolutely certain that the independent and unbiased MRO will offer him a $1 fine, or totally ignore it.
  25. Looked pretty ordinary ... and Lynch looked about to burst into tears.