old dee

Sorry I did not explain that well. I meant that a lot of members will wait to see how 2016 unfolds in the first month before committing their money.

You mean we are not now? I have never been a fan Honestly could he be any worse than 10 we had in yesterday?

Who?

While you make some good points Deespicable "The positive is the Pies are down on confidence," Please remove that line, we said that about Essendrug and the Pies last time

He currently could not run past me 2016 before you see him again

But will we continue? Some dropped by the wayside yesterday I am sure. 2016 is going to be a "Show me the Money" year for a lot of members

I actually like my friends. If I had a North supporter friend they would get a laugh

I have no idea when the point arrives for players but there were a lot of members who reached it yesterday.

Plenty to choose from Django just take your pick

Dawes could not make the goal square from 50 then again he could not make it from 35 in the first quarter so I guess he got better as the game went on.

Comment of the day Gorgoroth

I was in agreement till you got to this line "I don't reckon the dogs, saints, and even port have better players," IMO yes they do. We keep trying to convince ourselves that the average ability of the list has risen significantly. IMO it is has risen marginally we are still cursed with the ineptitude of the decade up to the end of 2013.

Spot on dc love your dawes with lower case d appropriate

You can put the house on that one ADC

Spot on GM It is not the coaching panel. We still have a barrel of monkeys. We have far too many players who are not skilled enough to cut it at AFL level. Respectability is still some years off. Still a lot of trading years to go to fix the decade of being poorly run.

You mean there is a choice rjay?

He has not played one game this year were he justified his selection the next game. His in an expensive liability. If you keep doing the same things why do expect the result to change? We have seen three weeks on end against bottom sides where we have played exactly the same way with the same group of players. You do not need to be a rocket scientist to know that it is well and truly time for change. Out: Dawes, Tyson, Stretch, Harmes, and Vandenberg In: Mckenzie, Riley, Spencer or Jamar Fitzgerald Yes the ins are all NGE's but change is necessary to change the mind set

17 touches that equats to 10 fumbles 5 dropped marks 2 grubber kicks.Oh and you missed the biggest one 20 non events in the ruck where he failed to get to the contest Just pushed aside.

For about ten of them that time has passed.We know what we have a bottom three list. There is nowhere for them to hide they are exposed by their own efforts. I am on the edge anything less than five players dropped from Yesterdays teams will push me over. There is not another team in the competition that would play Dawes next week. Lets see.

I will be if he is not CB

Could he be possible worse than about ten of yesterdays team?

I truly don't think it is my fault Redleg. However I share your feeling. This might show how I feel. Yesterday as I was preparing to go to the game my four year old Granddaughter said to me " Pa why don't you stay home with me and play Barbies?" Next weekend I will darling Next weekend I will I promise.

Spot on wiseblood IMO the sides are fairly evenly match.Roo on one leg is as good as Dawes.

Not sure why you are all so down on Hird he is hardly done by but just you all wait the truth will be known. You non believers will look silly when all is revealed. W anker.

I would to see 10 for a whole game WJ.