Everything posted by Bitter but optimistic
- GAMEDAY: Rd 12 vs Carlton
- GAMEDAY: Rd 12 vs Carlton
- GAMEDAY: Rd 12 vs Carlton
- GAMEDAY: Rd 12 vs Carlton
- GAMEDAY: Rd 12 vs Carlton
- GAMEDAY: Rd 12 vs Carlton
- GAMEDAY: Rd 12 vs Carlton
- GAMEDAY: Rd 12 vs Carlton
- GAMEDAY: Rd 12 vs Carlton
- GAMEDAY: Rd 12 vs Carlton
- GAMEDAY: Rd 12 vs Carlton
- GAMEDAY: Rd 12 vs Carlton
- GAMEDAY: Rd 12 vs Carlton
- GAMEDAY: Rd 12 vs Carlton
- GAMEDAY: Rd 12 vs Carlton
-
GAMEDAY: Rd 12 vs Carlton
I thought last week was a certain win but we kicked ourselves to a loss. This week I reckon Tommo back will add much improved structure down back. I just hope we can find some structure at the other end. I have a feeling we'll kick away in the second half after a close start.. Sadly though, a well earned attack of gout will confine me to The Manor. I'll be an armchair expert tonight
- PREGAME: Rd 12 vs Carlton
-
Hawks racism allegations (merged thread)
I know you're beyond cliches dc .....but .... "You couldn't script this stuff "
-
Hawks racism allegations (merged thread)
And now Dill has suggested that Hawthorn could be given a wack !!!!! FMD !!! What a beautiful system!
- PREGAME: Rd 12 vs Carlton
-
The List
I have often wondered about this Luci. Is it likely that many/most of those "guests" are in fact D'landers who have not logged in or simply wish to read anonymously?
-
MRP & MRO Fiasco
Ignoring the universal dislike of Zorko, again I am left confused by the decision. I was watching 360 last night and it was reported that both the oppo player involved , Peddlar, and his Club's medicos reported no contact to the eye. I have no idea of Zorko's intent but a hand coming into contact anywhere on the face, in that type of situation would , on most occasions, be incidental.
-
What They Are Saying At Princes Park
Welcome back Luci and, as usual, great work!
-
Hawks racism allegations (merged thread)
I have read @BoBo 's take above, and agree with his emphasis on the importance of finding 1. I have quoted it below "No adverse findings have been made in the Independent Investigation against any of the individuals against whom allegations have been made (“Individual Respondents”)." However, I would like a lawyerly interpretation of just what this statement means in relation to, particularly, Clarkson and Fagan. Does " No adverse findings" mean that there is no evidence of wrongdoing? Is it an exoneration? Or is it to be interpreted as BoBo suggests, that we really aren't any wiser so let's just ..... err move on ? Over to our in house KC - calling @Redleg.
- PREGAME: Rd 12 vs Carlton