Jump to content

Dr. Gonzo

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dr. Gonzo

  1. Feral scum from a feral wasteland
  2. Was one of our best last week.
  3. The free to May that wasn't when Hawkins tackled him to the ground and then Hawkins snaps a goal at the next stoppage. People are making out like it was a diabolical performance. It wasn't. We were a bit off and it showed from the first bounce. May was off all game. We tried to work our way back into it but couldn't get our noses in front and they had the answers when it counted. You could tell this meant a lot to them after r23 and the Prelim last year and they really set up around the contests to stifle us and worked our talls under the ball so they couldn't take contested marks. Well played and coached by them but I'm not giving up on the season on that performance. Plenty on here prepared to jump off at the first hurdle, get a grip!
  4. Exactly. When you get smashed around the contest the forwards have no hope. This was on the midfielders not the forwards. Not too concerned though.
  5. Kicking to Maxys end in the last 🤞
  6. And out on the fulls
  7. We could pinch it but have to up our game around the contest. Been very sloppy all game, our touch seems a little off.
  8. Stanley? Was rumoured earlier in the week.
  9. There was a Deebrief podcast today with Stafford, he said the players love getting up for the "prize fights". Been buzzing for the past two days waiting for this one, lets [censored] go!
  10. Because the AFL makes up the rules as they go (plus they have the ability to waive the rules if they deem fit). The AFL brought in the rule to stop teams mortgaging their future but Jackson is only in his 3rd season so giving up pick 2 or 3 for him when he was a pick 3 three years ago will be signed off easily. They did a similar thing with the Hawks or Cats a few years back, signed off on them trading out a pick when they hadn't used enough in the 4 year period.
  11. Not necessarily, we've been pretty good at identifying teams needing points for FS/academy selections and trading up the draft order by bundling picks. I know they've changed the rules on this recently but if we package picks 36 (at this stage) & 41 we may be able to move up. Plus we don't know whether we'll get any compo if Gus decides to leave or a trade in a 2nd round pick if someone asks for a trade (say Hunt?)
  12. Or we could just give them our 1st rounder back and they include their 2nd rounder - basically will be a downgrade of 2-5 picks
  13. Exactly - it's not just working with Max, it's working with Tracca, Oliver, Viney, Harmes, Sparrow, Jordon, Langdon, Brayshaw(?) - Freo have a very good midfield too but Fyfe and Mundy won't be around forever either.
  14. Hes also missed 3 games (Essendon, Port and GWS) so you'd think he'd have at least another 4 or 5 goals from those 3 games. He's averaging 1.7 goals a game. Ideally he'd be up around 2.5 goals a game but he's had to play a lone hand for the last 5 or 6 weeks since TMac went down. He can play better but I don't see him being dropped.
  15. That's not his only job, but it's a key part of his role and something Weideman has struggled to do. If we had someone better at playing that role they would be in, but we don't. Besides Brown has kicked 5 goals in the last 3 games and really should've had two more. Would be nice if he was averaging 2 a game but it's not like he's been unsighted.
  16. Ben Brown has been OK the last 3 games I think. Much better than his previous run of games. It's difficult being the only key forward defenders have to worry about and it would be great if he can clunk a couple of extra marks per game but as long as he's not getting outmarked and is bringing the footy to ground then he's playing his role.
  17. You might have to fork out for an extra 2187 memberships to get us over the line WCW 🤣
  18. Ending the game with 5 AA's on the bench just rubbed salt into the wound. Like an NBA side resting their starters once the game is won.
  19. Well they certainly [censored] themselves 💩😆
  20. Sucks being Geelong, they get a tummy bug every September!
  21. I love it, especially because even the waterboy is laughing at him!
  22. And just for good measure
  23. ENJOY!!
  24. I agree with everything you've said other than the 22 round season coming into effect in 1925. It actually only came into effect in 1970 up until then we had an 18 round (20 rounds in 1968-69) season so there was no evenness in the fixture. The thing is in the AFL the fixture doesn't have to be a true home and away - the H&A season is only there to seed the clubs for finals, we don't award the premiership to the leader at the end of H&A like the EPL. It would be nice to see some evenness around how many times teams host each other over a period of time though. The other thing is that all the arguments you've made about us going to Geelong could just as easily be made by clubs like WCE, Port, GC, Freo etc against us for having to play in the NT. They could very well say "why do we always play Melbourne in the NT, they should rotate it so Collingwood, Richmond etc have to play the Demons there too". Obviously that will never happen though.
  25. I don't think so