praha

Oh! Setting the recorder for that one!

Air Jurrah would be great.

My sig is a joke. I made a thread with that exact quote about 3 years ago. Then he got traded and my face was/is red.

I think the current logo is great.

Did I miss the Joel MacDonald press conference?

Your inclusion of Garland in your list is an abomination.

As much as I love the guy, I want him to stay fit and play a full season before judging him based on a few great games.

I turned off after Dunstall asked Scully, "What are your plans with the money?" What kind of question is that?

Who?

Who?

We're not taking Ball with pick 11. Stop discussing it, stop thinking about it, stop debating it.

Well, we kind of already knew that. If he is available at 11, and all of the players we hoped to select up until 18 have been picked, we'll take Ball. If there are still some quality kids left at 11, we'll wait till 18. If Ball is available then, he is ours.

As much as I love my footy, I can't imagine anyone not wanting the World Cup here. I think people underestimate how much of an event it is. It's a million times bigger than the Olympics and to get it would be a massive boost for the country, Melbourne and sport in general. If for every 120 years of footy we get 1 World Cup, then hell yeah!

If he's available at 18, take him. If he's not, screw him.

That's a joke right?

I think Port would be a great bet at $10. Richmond and Freo couldn't possibly have ANOTHER year down the bottom, could they?

lol @ whoever voted 1

We have won the spoon two years in a row. We've lost several veteran players, including our most damaging forward (up until 2008). How exactly is it a disgrace that we are favourite? I'd say it was a pretty much given that we'd be favourite.

I love Rex. Will be listening to MMM from now on.

Doesn't matter how "deep" a draft is, the quality of player at the pick 34 mark is pretty much the same quality as in previous years.

So in other words, Newton and Meeson will never play another game for the MFC.

Yeah, but if you just accommodate the player, you're threatening the integrity of the league and therefore the game as a whole.

Free agency can't be introduced for another 20 years, unless you want a Premier League-style league, where the same 4 teams are always at the top. The illogical Players Assocation is so one-minded it's not even funny. Yeah, it acts in the best interest of the players, but isn't the position of the competition ultimately just as important as the integrity of the players within that league? How does introducing free agency, and essentially creating a one-sided competition, help maintain an even competition and therefore an even playing field, the very thing the players association is asking and constantly fighting for? Let's be honest - who would want to play for Melbourne when Collingwood can offer them just as much money, but more exposure and better facilities (as of right now?) As well as a bigger brand and more media exposure?

Love the demon logo.

We're changing our name to the Brock Mclean's.