-
Posts
14,646 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
18
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by jnrmac
-
It doesn't matter how many times you say it its not right I believe..... Under the old system of individual state laws, almost anyone or any organisation or company could bring an action for defamation. However, under the Uniform Defamation Law, corporations with 10 or more employees cannot sue. However, be warned that individuals or groups of individuals employed by or associated with that corporation - such as company directors, CEOs or managers - can still sue if they are identified by the publication. Not-for-profit organisations can still sue for defamation, no matter how many employees or members they have. We qualify under the last line....
-
MFC can because its a non-profit organisation. I would give it a 1% chance at best. Don's response was very short, pointed and guarded. No time for crowing Let's get the bog picture sorted first then go after the muck-rakers.. I assume the club now knows from the 800-1000 page report who the turncoats are from our organisation?? They might be in a spot of bother too...
-
Just released. About time. Good stuff.
-
They won't be selling any product to anyone on Demonland or Demonology..........
-
Caro jumped on this story early and is not letting it go. She has no real news, no evidence but keeps peddling the same crap. She wants to be able to shout out "I told you so" if we get toasted. On the available evidence (that seems to be freely leaking from within the AFL) there is no evidence of any wrongdoing. Only some evidence of misguided comments. Back to the smoking gun. if there any emails or specific meetings to engineer tanking that they have evidence of then we are toast. I very much doubt this exists. And without it they can't really do much. One issue is that all parties seem to have appointed separate legal advisors. This will likely result in 3 separate legal opinions about what to do or say to the AFL. CS, CC and DB and the Club might all have differing views on any strategy making a negotiated settlement much harder. Of course if one party rolls and fesses up that might make things more difficult. I remember a few years ago Ken Jarret from Elders fessing up about some offshore transaction and doing 6mnths jail. Scanlon, Elliott and others fought and won despite the Jarret confession. We must fight all the way because an adverse result affects us in every way. Sponsorship, gaming licences, recruitment, ridicule, penalties etc etc Fight fight fight
-
Bombers scandal: charged, <redacted> and <infracted>
jnrmac replied to Jonesbag's topic in Melbourne Demons
Jason CLare has just taken over from ROxon. He wanted a big media event to announce his own arrival and he has got one. -
Oh you must have read the 800 pages as well and all the references to CC's joke. you have just contradicted yourself If they had any real evideNce you would have heard about it by now. Fumbling?? NOt playing Watts? really? Is that all you've got??
-
I want to know if, after 7 months and 2300 newspaper articles and 78 threads comprising 11,234 posts, we have agreed on a definition of tanking yet????
-
life ban for that joke?? You are kidding. There is no hard evidence of telling the players to lose. FFS even Caro says we didn't tell the players to lose..and she would know !!!
-
While he argued Adelaide was harshly dealt with over Tippet. FFS what a moron.
-
Or misogyny too... they changed that for Juliar....
-
Bombers scandal: charged, <redacted> and <infracted>
jnrmac replied to Jonesbag's topic in Melbourne Demons
It would be kind of like saying (not exactly of course) you can't use a nasal spray to stop your nose running because it has a banned stimulant in it but me as a coach is free to use it. Many peptides are not illegal and if a coach is using them so what? I think the media are trying to infer skullduggery just like they did with the "Vault" and Dean Bailey not smiling etc -
Bombers scandal: charged, <redacted> and <infracted>
jnrmac replied to Jonesbag's topic in Melbourne Demons
err what about the quantities. They didn't spend $30k on regular vitamin b and c. The inference is pretty straightforward. -
Bombers scandal: charged, <redacted> and <infracted>
jnrmac replied to Jonesbag's topic in Melbourne Demons
typical of the hysterical reporting though, The coaches used WADA banned drugs (that were entirely legal for everyone except sports participants) They love a beat up..... -
WELCOME TO THE MELBOURNE FOOTBALL CLUB - BILLY STRETCH
jnrmac replied to e25's topic in Melbourne Demons
It's his fault already that Watts is no good..... -
And in uniform......
-
Bombers scandal: charged, <redacted> and <infracted>
jnrmac replied to Jonesbag's topic in Melbourne Demons
One $30k invoice would buy a lot of Swiss vitamin C tablets........ -
Bombers scandal: charged, <redacted> and <infracted>
jnrmac replied to Jonesbag's topic in Melbourne Demons
Total games played for Essendon 0 tee hee..... -
What? No live streaming today?? You guys need to lift your game.....
-
Bombers scandal: charged, <redacted> and <infracted>
jnrmac replied to Jonesbag's topic in Melbourne Demons
Buh-brrrrrrr he was there all last year.... -
Rumours are flying........
-
Bombers scandal: charged, <redacted> and <infracted>
jnrmac replied to Jonesbag's topic in Melbourne Demons
Essendon NAB Cup Team Rd 1 B ? ? ? HB ? ? ? C ? Goddard ? HF ? ? ? F ? ? ? Foll ? ? ? Int ? ? ? ? -
Bombers scandal: charged, <redacted> and <infracted>
jnrmac replied to Jonesbag's topic in Melbourne Demons
You cant just swan in here and say things like that. -
Bombers scandal: charged, <redacted> and <infracted>
jnrmac replied to Jonesbag's topic in Melbourne Demons
I think you can throw that theory in the Dust -bin.