beelzebub

To be thruthful i think Collingwood have been very very clever i this. They have a solution and it hardly dilutes the brand. Am I jealous...you better believe I am lol

Just a quick perusal at fixture teams I think we can more than take it up to, alphabetically Carlton(1) Collingwood (2) Essendon (1), Giants (2) , St Kilda (2) WCE (1) and Doggies (2) teams a fair crack at Adelaide (1) , Gold Coast (1) Richmond (1) , Port (1) and Lions (1) There are 16 games there that aren't impossible indeed quite a few very gettable Can't understand why anyone doesn't think at least half of those might not be wins for the Dees given we now have 'some' firepower where there was very little and our midfield wont be any worse, indeed ought to be in the realms of 25% to 33% better ( efficiency ) Pluses : Backline more defined and bolstered. More attack and run off the hbl Midfield better stocked and more experienced. Forwards.... now have real potency Minuses. Not only team to change and potentially improve Last year we lost games that arguably were ours to win. I just dont see that repeating in 2015. Not just hope , but we will be more evolved, experienced and confident as a list. Games that may provide , seemingly , the greatest upsets are against North, Port, and Geelong Will be a very interesting year Not pessimistic at all

One might say they didnt design them at all !!

yep....they finally arrived at a reasonable solution took 'em long enough...but better late than never. Pretty well brings us to the end of the line on this subject I'd have thought.

thanks....very interesting

A day anyone who had ventured into that hostile territory will always remember fondly...even if the heart got a real work out !!

need to get out more Red !! just saying

thats not wine me thinks !!

Its interesting when you're self confessed absorbed watcher of all this how the narrative seems to wax and wane throughout the whole sordid affair. Hird...I take full responsibility >>>>>>>> actually hes taken none EFC... We welcome and will assist any investigation >>>>> we'll fight you on the beaches we'll fight you in the streets ...and especially in court EFC...We dont know what they took or were injected with ( as if ) >>>>>> whatever it was was safe This lot could get senior jobs at the Orwellian Ministry of Truth But Dank is truly the master of double speak on the fly. Apparently when in a Football World he refers to Thymosin...he means the "good "one ...or according to him Thymomodulin But when you look on his website any and all references to Thymosin are acually to Thymosin Beta 4 (Tß4) Then we have the all important pic of the real stuff...via Wallis..of whatever it is and to think you can just go get this stuff off the shelves.....well sorta...not here granted...but why involve a compounding chemist if all you're after is >>>

Doesnt sound that dissimilar to the Dukan diet

rookie or #53 ??

Depends what the actual insurance to date was for I would imagine. I only used medical malpractice as as an example, wasnt suggesting this was such a case. Just suggesting with insurers they'll write up a risk assessment for anything and charge accordingly. Ive no idea what policy the EFC are pulling down on to date , but they've got one , because it's paying up.

works for me

insurance in reality is nothing more than wagering ( both sides )

lets not be too revisionist...he was crap to begin with...last 2-3 years he's realsed he CAN play footy and does

Not quite. medical Mal practice is there for just the basic f-ups !! accidental or negligent... doesnt matter thats why its there I confess Im not au fait with the possible nature of professional insurances that EFC have but I wouldnt think it matters good bad or indifferent..Its an insurance

Not yet is doesnt. Far from out of the woods yet. They havent ( nor anyone else likely ) seen the likes of the lawsuits coming their way. It wont all be covered by insurance either

Nor do I ... and I dont see clashes in half the supposed instances that apparently require us to alter from our beloved Red and Blue

isnt that what mal practice insurance is all about though...just saying

referencing shorts and colours. The notion of a clash strip is to LESSEN the confusion ( apparently ) So if youre wearing the white or red strip its to be the 'lighter' team. You dont then introduce DARK shorts ..its negating

Wouldn't fret too much about the Hulk...has almost an 'old' head on those young shoulders . Knows where to be, how to work his mass , has good footy brain.

Honestly cant see the confusion when playing the suns.... if we wear dark shorts and they wear white....whats the problem ?

actually they dont its about intent as much as anything

Not sure how close to the mark this is..but is a thought. Weve been aligned with the notion of taking Lever for a while , but in my estimation it was with the pick garnered as change in a Tyson like deal, had that happened. I think weve always looked to grab Brayshaw and thought about Lever a tad later. In a sense the only question becomes...If Saints grab Petracca do we still follow the original script ? Its quite fascinating even if it wasnt our own club.