markc

i read maybe 2 or 3 years all clubs had some deals like this bar 2 clubs... which was melbourne and north , now this could have changed since then

in 2030 I will be 62 .....

there is 78 players on third party deals , most are only 20 or 30 k but there seems to be a few Like Judd's but from what was said his is the most this was in the paper , i will find the link

my mistake then and i guess that's the power of the written word and I read your picture and vault together i apologize for this mate thought i better quickly post this as it was my mistake, i will further reply later when I get back as for enjoying footy , it would be much better if we could win a few more games but this will come and yes the club is always bigger than the individual i look forward to club being one again , the merger crap , the CW tanking crap and so on , we all need to move on we played by the rules simple as that

Fan, i was re reading some posts and did notice this , Fan if this is true that were sitting there in that room , wouldn't you be better served keeping quiet on this matter ? , are you after attention to be called for what was said ? it seems strange you have now started to post and this has come out ? from the outside I don't know if you had a problem with the club or board or even still do . If from what i read you did help out the club and believe you did , well done , I like a few have had a problem with the club or players in my stores ( my brighton store to be honest and I believe we meet there too ) and walked away , only 3 years ago CC came and saw me and got me back , i would always support the club but to be honest not as much as I once did over that period. But Now I am back . I am sure you saw that Pinball machine in the player lunch room . i dont want to know what you heard or sat in on. as far as i am concerned Melbourne played by the rules and did what they needed to do and I support that this witch hunt by CW is just pathetic , very little facts and real quotes , the Age has lost me forever mark

all this makes for a interesting afternoon of reading thanks I knew someone will kick it off again glad to see we all getting along

from what she has said in last few weeks thats like her giving us a kiss ! i was taliking to friend in usa and he lives in Brooklyn and we was discussing a email that he was sent from one of my competitors and i said how bad it was , he came back with. mark I am from Brooklyn, thats like a kiss , if he didnt say stuff like that he would be worried .

you have to love his smirk ...

i love the reply re game plan !! well worth watching it

In 1987, Sydney were fined the maximum of $60,000 and forfeited their first round pick in the National Draft after a VFL investigation found that they had exceeded the salary cap by $1.15 million during the season. In 1992, Sydney were fined $50,000 after it was found that they had failed to disclose payments made to former player Greg Williams during the 1990 season; Williams was suspended for six matches and fined the maximum of $25,000 for accepting the payments.[27] Hawthorn was fined $28,500 in 1992 for a minor breach in relation to benefit payments. Three clubs were fined for minor breaches in 1993: Melbourne ($13,450), Carlton ($9,750) and Footscray ($2,700).[28] In 1994, Carlton were fined $50,000 after it was found that they had exceeded the salary cap by $85,000 during the 1993 season.[29] In 1995, Sydney were fined $20,000 after key documents relating to player financial details and star full-forward Tony Lockett's contract details were lost in the post by club officials, forcing the club, who had won the last three wooden spoons, to scratch from the 1995 pre-season draft and play the season two players short.[30] The club officials responsible were fired by the Swans one week later. In 1996, Essendon were fined a record $638,250 ($250,000 in back tax and penalties, $112,000 for draft tampering and $276,250 for breaching the salary cap regulations), forfeited their first, second and third round picks in the National Draft and were excluded from the 1997 rookie and pre-season drafts after a joint Australian Tax Office and AFL investigation found that they had committed serious and systematic breaches of the salary cap regulations totalling $514,500 between 1991 and 1996.[31] Ten other clubs were fined in 1996 for minor breaches in a crackdown following the Sydney incident the year before: Fitzroy, St Kilda and North Melbourne ($30,000 each), Richmond ($20,000), and Brisbane, Collingwood, the Western Bulldogs, Fremantle, Hawthorn and the West Coast Eagles ($10,000 each). In 1997, Port Adelaide was fined $50,000 for late lodgement of documents relating to the contract and financial details of five players.[32] In 1998, the West Coast Eagles were fined $100,000 and forfeited their third round pick in the National Draft after it was found that they had exceeded the salary cap by a total of $165,000 during the 1997 and 1998 seasons. Geelong were fined $77,000 in 1998 and excluded from the 1999 pre-season draft after it was found that they had exceeded the salary cap by $154,000 during the 1997 season. Four other clubs were fined in 1998 for minor breaches after an AFL investigation: Collingwood ($47,500), Hawthorn ($45,000), Richmond ($21,000) and the Western Bulldogs ($5,300). Collingwood and Richmond were also excluded from the 1999 pre-season draft.[33] In 1999, Melbourne were fined $600,000 and forfeited their first, second and third round picks in the National Draft for two years after it was found that they had committed serious and systematic breaches of the salary cap regulations totalling $810,000 between 1995 and 1998. Fremantle were handed Melbourne's first round pick for the 1999 National Draft as compensation for losing ruckman Jeff White to Melbourne. Two other clubs were fined in 1999 for minor breaches: Carlton ($43,800) and Geelong ($20,000); Carlton were also excluded from the 2000 pre-season draft.[34] In 2000, Fremantle were fined $54,400 and excluded from the 2001 pre-season draft for a string of minor breaches. Fremantle's poor 2001 season (in which it won the wooden spoon) has been put down to this penalty. Four other clubs were fined in 2000 for minor breaches: North Melbourne ($35,000), Richmond ($10,000), Brisbane ($7,500), and Melbourne ($5,000).[35] In 2001, Carlton were fined $125,150, forfeited their second and third round picks in the 2001 National Draft and were excluded from the 2002 pre-season draft after it was found that they had failed to disclose payments totaling $239,900 to captain Craig Bradley and incorrectly lodged an additional services agreement document during the 1998 and 1999 seasons. Three other clubs were fined in 2001 for minor breaches: Richmond and North Melbourne ($20,000 each) and Melbourne ($5,000).[36] In 2002, Carlton were fined a record $987,500 and forfeited their priority picks in the National Draft, their first and second round picks in the National Draft for two years and were excluded from the 2003 pre-season draft after an AFL investigation found that they had committed serious and systematic breaches of the salary cap regulations totaling $1.37 million between 1998 and 2001; ruckman Matthew Allan was suspended for five matches and fined $10,000 for accepting undisclosed payments from club officials. Carlton struggled for seven years as it recovered both on and off the field from these significant penalties, finishing no higher than 11th in 2004 and winning their first-ever wooden spoons in 2002, 2005 and 2006. After the draft ban expired, Carlton received a multitude of priority and first round draft picks.[37] Fremantle were fined $80,000 in 2002 for late and incorrect lodgement of documents relating to the financial and contract details of four players. In 2003, Brisbane were fined $260,000 for late lodgement of documents relating to the contract and financial details of 26 players, and the Western Bulldogs were fined $30,000 for late lodgement of documents relating to the contract and financial details of three players after a crackdown in light of the Carlton scandal the year before. Essendon were fined $85,000 in 2003 but did not have any points deducted after it was found that they had exceeded the salary cap by $106,000 during the 2002 season.[38] In 2004, Melbourne were fined $30,000 for incorrect lodgement of documents relating to the contract and financial details of three players.[39] In 2005, St Kilda were fined $40,000 for a minor breach in regards to minor sponsor Xbox providing players with the game machines.[40] Brian Waldron, Matt Hanson and Cameron Vale, the club's CEO, CFO and Financial Officer at the time, are currently under investigation by ASIC, the Australian Tax Office, and the Victorian State Revenue Office in relation to the Melbourne Storm salary cap scandal in the NRL. In 2006, St Kilda were fined $40,000 for late lodgement of documents relating to the contract and financial details of four players.[41] Richmond was fined $10,000 in 2007 for late lodgement of a document relating to the contract and financial details of a player.[42] Two clubs were fined in 2008 for minor breaches: Adelaide ($20,000) and St Kilda ($10,000).[43] In 2011, Richmond were fined $10,000 but did not have any points deducted after it was found that they had exceeded the salary cap by $13,000 during the 2010 season.[44] In 2012, Collingwood were fined $20,000 for late lodgement of documents relating to the contract and financial details of two players.[45] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salary_cap

good luck and well done , its one of the hardest things to do and its my shout for the coffee , so you name the place and yes I like re pro bono LOL

I am no lawyer but i would be going the AFL for his fee , if charges are not proven

sounds like she has been reading demonland ....

no worries I am no way qualified to say it isnt was just curious thanks mark

good to see we are looking at taking anything that COULD happen further , even it is is to court about time those balls dropped !

not to question this but with both hogan and martin taken out already the rest must be good you would think these 2 would have to be both top 5 picks next year for what we and GC gave up

It seems funny that CW on spoke of the Crows in her exclusive but the herald sun had both about Crows facing the AFL on monday and Melbourne , maybe she not getting told everything anymore ??

Melbourne escapes penalties ahead of next week's draft, but AFL comes down heavily on Crows This was from the Herald Sun so did CW miss something re Crows? Most of the article is about Crows and just the start is re Melbourne.

how about we worry about it IF it happens and to me thats a BLOODY big IF we have Viney they cant change that , he is signed sealed and delivered to us this cannot be changed no matter what pick we use at this stage its 27

i thought I read somewhere it was like a million of his wages was promotional which the afl was paying so GWS paying very little

Dean Bailey tells the AFL he didn't order players to lose http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/dean-bailey-tells-the-afl-he-didnt-order-players-to-lose/story-e6freck3-1226511021945 And right down the bottom: Melbourne faces "severe" penalties if found guilty, but will likely have seven days to reply to any AFL findings. That means Melbourne has a good chance of retaining its No.4 selection and the No.27 pick it needs to secure father-son selection Jack Viney in the November 22 national draft because the investigation will be ongoing.

I agree here he has always been good for a chat and a joke ., never been a problem for him to stop and talk.

will we see this when the show comes back , wonder what Garry will say .....

thankyou for the laugh well done

she is getting the reaction she wants here , I would g/tee she is reading here and for fixing mistakes as she done in previous articles the tide seemed to turn with MFC responding and she didnt like what we said. so she came out with her latest rubbish , well thats my read on it