daisycutter

still deliberating on close. 32 minutes now.

did ralph ever play footy?

Tribunal. Close case has been in deliberation on verdict for 10min. Rooey up soon. you can follow on here

everyone has gone nana and behaving like nuts

this thread is getting too high-brow intellectual for me ... need a rest

we're about 4 weeks ahead of last year

more good news 61,260

?? Phantom was frew publishing

it's 4 cases now, uncle. extra one from sunday's games

had you figured for a caspar the friendly ghost fan, and uncle bitters an archie, betty and veronica fan

how sad nobody remembered the delectable tex bar 😥

still a bit unusual led for the entire game, straight kicking at it could have been a bigger win 7 players got votes and only 2 for us. bit odd, but we move on, maybe goody sending a message

whatever happened to the Tex bar and it's sibling the Mint Tex bar ah the memories. Fish and chips in newspaper followed by a Tex bar

i'm not making it such a big deal actually just saying that we have been poorly treated by the mrp/mro over the journey yet we make less fuss than our contemporaries and rarely appeal. there's a perception that we just roll over too easily

wasn't worth 2 weeks ... no malice involved ... harsh treatment a star player from big club wouldn't have got

not against the idea, but i'd like a heck of lot more detail on what a republic would look like and what constitutional changes would be made there are some very, very ordinary republics around the world

hmmmm .... disappearing umpires .... that's a great suggestion

for one, chandler was worth an appeal

maybe he should have ds, but hell it was a very difficult ball drop to judge

the comments on ralph's twit go to show ralph is a twit [censored] edit: [one letter different that twit] 🤣

don't understand this point, can you clarify, more details? otherwise, i don't mind the idea .... but i doubt it would even be considered.

suggestion was a little tongue in cheek 😆 but not totally

agree mro should only cite incidents/players in that current short time then (except for simple fine cases) give the cited player (club) 24 hours to provide info the mro has not seen so for cases involving game suspension the mro use a 2 stage process. only after that could a tribunal appeal be used there seems a lot of consensus in the broad public that the mro system is broken (again!)

i'm aware of the background still silly to entrust to one person. smacks of him being the trusted monkey to do the afl's crazy engineering