daisycutter

it's ok to say 'bleeding', dp ... really

yeah, 5 min gets you nowhere really, unless you're herb elliot 😁

jfk also said - nicht fragen

and in the latest news from afl house ... the afl has announced that fartometers will be installed in all player interchange benches. any player caught farting will be fined by the mro for unsportsmanlike behaviour. repeat offenders or particularly smelly farters could be suspended or referred to the afl tribunal. the afl spokesman said this is further step in the afl's commitment to a safer and more inclusive workplace.

and i though you were an osterrichisch 😮 that's german for an ostrich icydk

mein gott! i can just see the headline in the hun german savaged by german

was funny, but

what happened to (ollie) henry? [censored] hopeless

for wcw's confusion think gfc

think he was just helpfully telling the dorks player his fly was undone

did you check narrm.demons demons.narrm narrm.mfc mfc.narrm melbourne.narrm etc?

yes, i especially wouldn't be asking henry either

more filth supporters means more dollars for us

send it a census form (appropriately worded for gender choices of course)

i never thought something could be more inconsistent than afl umpiring ...... ... and then along came christian and the mro it seems no-one knows the rules, but manipulating them is ok more chance playing russian roulette

ralph ... lol

tic ... tic ... 62,954

not only that. consider that christian makes his decision on his own in a virtual vacuum. no opportunity for cited player to offer explanations, etc and this is after 4 umpires didn't even award a free and it was out in the open for all to see. So the mro makes a decision on one person's input with no other opinions and if a suspension is awarded it becomes very difficult to overturn and we know the afl hence mro have an agenda which amounts to a continual changing of the interpretation of a rule mid season. the solution is to change or clarify the rules before a season starts. the term duty of care is not a rule because it is not clearly definable and loose enough to just re-interpret whenever the current agenda presents itself. if the afl is so concerned about litigation and optics it needs to do a better job on its rules and get proper fully professional umpires rather than part timers.

look like uncle, mombon and redleg ... lol

watch it again. he didn't swing him around. day swung around himself against the momentum to handball backwards. sparrow just pulled down as he was already off his feet probably all moot now as no sign of club going to tribunal

true, but surely 1 out of 4 had a decent view imo day caused the slinging by turning backwards against his and sparrows momentum

4 umpires who had a better view didn't think so can't see what sparrow did wrong

huh, day had both arms free sparrow tackled him from underneath and was already on the deck, where else was day going to land doesn't even look like a typical sling tackle and no double action days pace and momentum was why he hit the deck incidental football action ... sheez

appeal all the way to the un court of human rights if necessary dangerous tackles have now become chook lotto