Redleg

It was the Super Summer Sports Show.

Sorry you have lost me, what does that mean? What was the name of the radio segment you are suggesting?

For once Bob, I hope your feeling is right and mine is wrong.

Good to see friendships continuing.

While I support Taylor, I have this gnawing feeling, that Pickett could be another Dion Johnstone, while Kemp becomes a Fyfe/Cripps/Dangerfield type. If Kemp is what he is described as I would take him and look for a small forward with our last pick. A strong, tall, quick mid, is far more value imo, than a small forward and harder to come by.

Not sure if you are agreeing with me or disagreeing. I was pointing out to the poster that we can and have picked players who won’t play straight away.

If it is true we are taking Pickett at 10, we won’t be doing any swap with Port for 12-18 as they could also want him. In another example of how badly compromised the draft is, Freo will take Henry, a better player than Pickett, at a much later pick, while we will have to use 10 to get Pickett.

Never had one.

What will we talk about after the draft.

Only if we want him more than Jackson or anybody else.

You mean like taking Jesse Hogan at pick 2 who couldn’t play for a year and no that was before his back surgery injury.

Singapore to Brisbane, Darwin on Monday.

Yes I have. That is my second mix up today. I guess I shouldn’t be drinking so much on the cruise I am on.

Hope that puts to bed the rumour that Bennell and May don’t get on.

Very possible.

I can’t believe I mixed that up. The late great Greg “nightlife “ Korn was a star of the show.

He owned a bit of SEN so not broke.

I gave Finey his first break on radio, on a Sports Show I did with WJ and former Demon Trevor Korn and the Lawyer Steven Peak is a mate and partner in a racehorse with me. I had to push the dump button and erase several swear words from Finey. He did know his sport however.

I think you are now leading the most pessimistic poster on DL award. Have not seen one positive optimistic post yet.

So my suggestion yesterday that we might really want Green and we can get him, if GWS don’t match, could still happen.

I blame the MFC for poor construction.

That would have to mean our target is not Jackson or Green unless we got an understanding from GWS that they would not take Jackson at 3. I think we would want another pick in teens plus 4 given what it means to GWS.

Geelong apparently want McAsey a key defender and need to move up a bit to ensure getting him.

Whatever happens on draft night, there is no doubt the AFL have added a new layer of intrigue to the draft, with pick swapping and matching. They have succeeded in keeping football front and centre of media sports coverage, not to mention launching fan sites into turbo charged overdrive.

Let me throw a cat amongst the pigeons, hypothetically speaking. What if our real target is Green, with Jackson as our next choice. We let it be known that we want Jackson. GWS trade up to be able to get Green and another top 5 player, believing we will take Jackson. If GWS also rate Jackson above Green and we nominate Green they get one or the other but not the second player, if they match a Green bid. This could have given us the chance to get Green if he is our target. Could this be the case, or am I just looking for intrigue?