Redleg

Yes, but as Jeremiah the Bullfrog always said, One is the loneliest number.

He should be 200 cms by draft night.

Port stronger and us much weaker with the changes. Will need a big effort.

Agree.

I thought we were discussing Chandler.

Whose place will he take in 23 to be a regular?

That's the whole point, he is not getting regular games and that is why he may decide to move on.

Yes you did. If he shows promise and is not getting a game, why wouldn't he look around? It's not just clubs that let players go, players also leave because they want better opportunities.

Buddy will be 36 next January.

i think you just answered your own question.

If they got the bloke they wanted, his salary would cause them to let go of players and Lobb has stated his partner wants to get back to the East Coast. Freo might not want Lobb to go, but if they get their man and hopefully not, they will need to make cap space.

Well there you go, I thought he was playing rock, paper, scissors with Max.

BTW have a look at the last posts on the Jacko thread.

Lucy, we are getting confused here about Lobb and Jacko. My original post was about Freo wanting Lobb to stay, who is contracted btw for next year, in connection to not getting Jacko. Whatwhatsaywhat was commenting on Lobb's good year this year and that the word is he's gone, even though he is contracted.

Or two.

Greg sadly passed away not long ago.

The fact that Freo are now wanting Lobb to stay, might be due to someone not coming to them.

Wouldn’t be dropping Toby for an Alice Springs game.

Tracc just said on 360 he wasn’t aware that ducking was prior opportunity and could be pinged for holding the ball. Don’t Coaches update players on new rules?

Last Injury report was 7-9 weeks, as of last saturday.

He is the one, but what chance?

RIP Noel, a hard man on the field, who gave his all for the Dees and was a true Dees Great. Condolences to family and friends.

And hopefully playing a home final.

I also enjoy winning. Are you saying that a player making space on the opposite wing or corridor, should be ignored on the kick out, in order to go the usual kick to the left and to a pack? I would love to know the stat of how often we have control of the ball, 70-80 metres out, on our kick outs. I personally think it is madness to not try and create quick ball movement, when it is available. It gives a better chance of scoring, with less defenders able to flood back. I think the current kick it to the pack on the left no matter what, is hurting us badly.

Not helpful that Tigers play Dockers at G in 2 weeks and have lost both rucks and Lynch. We need a top 2 finish to guarantee home final, unless all Vic teams in top 4. Of course we still need to make the top 4.